New York moves to become 6th state to legalize gay marriage

ahlycotc wrote:

Sean wrote:Thats different, they stuck by their Religion because of their salvation, because they believed it was the be all and end all of life. What exactly do Gay people earn?

The enjoyment of gay sex.

ahlycotc wrote:

Sean wrote:Thats different, they stuck by their Religion because of their salvation, because they believed it was the be all and end all of life. What exactly do Gay people earn?

The enjoyment of gay sex.

Forest wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:

Sean wrote:Thats different, they stuck by their Religion because of their salvation, because they believed it was the be all and end all of life. What exactly do Gay people earn?

The enjoyment of gay sex.

What a stupid answer


Do straight people only earn the enjoyment of straight sex then?

SBSP wrote:

Forest wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:

Sean wrote:Thats different, they stuck by their Religion because of their salvation, because they believed it was the be all and end all of life. What exactly do Gay people earn?

The enjoyment of gay sex.

What a stupid answer


Do straight people only earn the enjoyment of straight sex then?

No, they make babies.

Dan wrote:

SBSP wrote:

Forest wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:

Sean wrote:Thats different, they stuck by their Religion because of their salvation, because they believed it was the be all and end all of life. What exactly do Gay people earn?

The enjoyment of gay sex.

What a stupid answer


Do straight people only earn the enjoyment of straight sex then?

No, they make babies.

Gay people can make babies.

SBSP wrote:

Dan wrote:

SBSP wrote:

Forest wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:

The enjoyment of gay sex.

What a stupid answer


Do straight people only earn the enjoyment of straight sex then?

No, they make babies.

Gay people can make babies.

Through gay sex?

ahlycotc wrote:So nobody has answered me yet. If homosexual preference is natural, where is the gene that decides it?

Forest wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:

Sean wrote:Thats different, they stuck by their Religion because of their salvation, because they believed it was the be all and end all of life. What exactly do Gay people earn?

The enjoyment of gay sex.

What a stupid answer


Do straight people only earn the enjoyment of straight sex then?

ahlycotc wrote:

Forest wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:

Sean wrote:Thats different, they stuck by their Religion because of their salvation, because they believed it was the be all and end all of life. What exactly do Gay people earn?

The enjoyment of gay sex.

What a stupid answer


Do straight people only earn the enjoyment of straight sex then?

He said gay people don't earn anything. So I named something they earn.

Dan wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:So nobody has answered me yet. If homosexual preference is natural, where is the gene that decides it?

Not everything natural is to do with genetics.

Sean wrote:
Overpopulation is a massive problem in the world, thus it could be said that Gay people are saving the planet from further depletion of resources.

ahlycotc wrote:

Dan wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:

Dan wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:

No it's not a mental disorder. If it was a mental disorder, I can't blame gay people then. Humans are naturally straight. But the environment they live in might influence them to prefer the same sex over another.

No, they aren't. There is evidence of homosexuality in the Stone Age. Millions of years before Religion appeared on the scene.

If homosexuality is so immoral, how come many species on animal partake in it?

There is also evidence of murder in the Stone Age. Just because something happened, doesn't mean it's natural. There are many animal species that eat their sexual partner after sex. Does it make it OK for humans to eat their partner after sex? There are many animal species that eat their young as well.

I'm not arguing morality, I'm arguing whether something is natural. You stated that homosexuality isn't natural. Why? Because the bible states so. However, homosexual behaviour was around long before the bible.

How does the fact that homosexual activity occurring before the Bible prove that homosexual activity is natural? Like I said, just because something happened, doesn't mean it's natural. Murder happened, is it natural?

NZG wrote:

Sean wrote:Gay people arnt gonna lead to the end of the popualtion, theres anough straight people in the world to continue the human race, too many in fact.

I'm not saying they are going to end the population.


My point is that our point in life is to continue our species. Gay people don't help that so in a biological sense they are against our species because they aren't helping.

Just because you aren't helping someone, doesn't mean you are against them. That's Bush mentality there. Sorry, but I had to say that.

Dan wrote:

Are straight couples that don't attempt to have children just as bad then?

ahlycotc wrote:

Dan wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:So nobody has answered me yet. If homosexual preference is natural, where is the gene that decides it?

Not everything natural is to do with genetics.

Then how what decides homosexual preference?

ahlycotc wrote:

Dan wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:So nobody has answered me yet. If homosexual preference is natural, where is the gene that decides it?

Not everything natural is to do with genetics.

Then what decides homosexual preference?

Dan wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:

Dan wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:So nobody has answered me yet. If homosexual preference is natural, where is the gene that decides it?

Not everything natural is to do with genetics.

Then how what decides homosexual preference?

Who knows. There has been extensive research into it and no clear results. It isn't a choice, but you aren't born gay.


Maybe it's part of 'Gods plan'. He works in 'mysterious ways after all'.

NZG wrote:

Dan wrote:

Are straight couples that don't attempt to have children just as bad then?

Didn't really elaborate but straight couples who don't want children aren't helping the continuation of our species as well.

NZG wrote:

Dan wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:

Dan wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:So nobody has answered me yet. If homosexual preference is natural, where is the gene that decides it?

Not everything natural is to do with genetics.

Then how what decides homosexual preference?

Who knows. There has been extensive research into it and no clear results. It isn't a choice, but you aren't born gay.


Maybe it's part of 'Gods plan'. He works in 'mysterious ways after all'.

No clear results but you can say it isn't a choice.

NZG wrote:

Sean wrote:
Overpopulation is a massive problem in the world, thus it could be said that Gay people are saving the planet from further depletion of resources.

But a person who is born attracted to the same sex which won't lead to the continuation of our species is not helping, A baby doesn't know that there is overpopulation.

ahlycotc wrote:

Dan wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:

Dan wrote:

No, they aren't. There is evidence of homosexuality in the Stone Age. Millions of years before Religion appeared on the scene.

If homosexuality is so immoral, how come many species on animal partake in it?

There is also evidence of murder in the Stone Age. Just because something happened, doesn't mean it's natural. There are many animal species that eat their sexual partner after sex. Does it make it OK for humans to eat their partner after sex? There are many animal species that eat their young as well.

I'm not arguing morality, I'm arguing whether something is natural. You stated that homosexuality isn't natural. Why? Because the bible states so. However, homosexual behaviour was around long before the bible.

How does the fact that homosexual activity occurring before the Bible prove that homosexual activity is natural? Like I said, just because something happened, doesn't mean it's natural. Murder happened, is it natural?

NZG wrote:

Sean wrote:Gay people arnt gonna lead to the end of the popualtion, theres anough straight people in the world to continue the human race, too many in fact.

I'm not saying they are going to end the population.


My point is that our point in life is to continue our species. Gay people don't help that so in a biological sense they are against our species because they aren't helping.

Just because you aren't helping someone, doesn't mean you are against them. That's Bush mentality there. Sorry, but I had to say that.

Okay not against but they aren't helping our species.

Dan wrote:

Are straight couples that don't attempt to have children just as bad then?

Didn't really elaborate but straight couples who don't want children aren't helping the continuation of our species as well.

Dan wrote:

NZG wrote:

Dan wrote:

Are straight couples that don't attempt to have children just as bad then?

Didn't really elaborate but straight couples who don't want children aren't helping the continuation of our species as well.

I am elaborating.

You didn't answer my question. Are straight couples that choose not to have children just as bad as gay people?

NZG wrote:

Dan wrote:

NZG wrote:

Dan wrote:

Are straight couples that don't attempt to have children just as bad then?

Didn't really elaborate but straight couples who don't want children aren't helping the continuation of our species as well.

I am elaborating.

You didn't answer my question. Are straight couples that choose not to have children just as bad as gay people?

define just as bad?

Sean wrote:I swear , you people really make me question my faith.

NZG wrote:Okay i'm going to post this again.


I don't believe being gay is a choice, It is a environmental thing.

NZG wrote:Okay i'm going to post this again.


I don't believe being gay is a choice, It is a environmental thing.

Dan wrote:

NZG wrote:

Dan wrote:

NZG wrote:

Dan wrote:

Are straight couples that don't attempt to have children just as bad then?

Didn't really elaborate but straight couples who don't want children aren't helping the continuation of our species as well.

I am elaborating.

You didn't answer my question. Are straight couples that choose not to have children just as bad as gay people?

define just as bad?

Do they deserve the same words said about them as gay people have in this thread?