Strikers debate. With a Suarez vs Tores poll. :/

The-Reporter wrote:

Dan wrote:

kyro7 wrote:

Dan wrote:Henry better than Dalglish?.

Why is it a laughing matter?

Was a reply to whoever said 'u mad' when it was first brought up.



Still, Henry was one of the greatest players of his generation, Dalglish was one of the best players ever.

Dan lets face it, you've never seen Daglish play and obviously didn't watch Henry either. You're talking shit.

If you watch loads of the things Daglish did, Henry could did everyone of them. If you asked Daglish to take on 4 Galactico's and smash one past Casillas out of nothing, he couldn't.

Did you watch Dalglish often then?

Dean wrote:The Reporter: " Dalglish couldn't do half the things Henry done ".

Take your fucking goggles off.

Could he do what Henry did in that video i posted? I watch a video of him and a better comparison would be Bergkamp. Henry is another level.

Dan wrote:

The-Reporter wrote:

Dan wrote:

kyro7 wrote:

Dan wrote:Henry better than Dalglish?.

Why is it a laughing matter?

Was a reply to whoever said 'u mad' when it was first brought up.



Still, Henry was one of the greatest players of his generation, Dalglish was one of the best players ever.

Dan lets face it, you've never seen Daglish play and obviously didn't watch Henry either. You're talking shit.

If you watch loads of the things Daglish did, Henry could did everyone of them. If you asked Daglish to take on 4 Galactico's and smash one past Casillas out of nothing, he couldn't.

Did you watch Dalglish often then?

I've watched all the best things he's done as an individual and it doesn't touch Henry.

The-Reporter wrote:

Dean wrote:The Reporter: " Dalglish couldn't do half the things Henry done ".

Take your fucking goggles off.

Could he do what Henry did in that video i posted? I watch a video of him and a better comparison would be Bergkamp. Henry is another level.

Henry on another level to Dalglish?

The-Reporter wrote:

Dan wrote:

The-Reporter wrote:

Dan wrote:

kyro7 wrote:Why is it a laughing matter?

Was a reply to whoever said 'u mad' when it was first brought up.



Still, Henry was one of the greatest players of his generation, Dalglish was one of the best players ever.

Dan lets face it, you've never seen Daglish play and obviously didn't watch Henry either. You're talking shit.

If you watch loads of the things Daglish did, Henry could did everyone of them. If you asked Daglish to take on 4 Galactico's and smash one past Casillas out of nothing, he couldn't.

Did you watch Dalglish often then?

I've watched all the best things he's done as an individual and it doesn't touch Henry.

Ahem.

'Dan lets face it, you've never seen Daglish play and obviously didn't watch Henry either. You're talking shit.'


So, I can't make a judgement because I wasn't alive when Dalglish played, yet you haven't seen him play, yet you can make one?

Every player is different. Dalglish and Henry were both phenomenal players. Leave it at that.

Dan wrote:

The-Reporter wrote:

Dan wrote:

The-Reporter wrote:

Dan wrote:

Was a reply to whoever said 'u mad' when it was first brought up.



Still, Henry was one of the greatest players of his generation, Dalglish was one of the best players ever.

Dan lets face it, you've never seen Daglish play and obviously didn't watch Henry either. You're talking shit.

If you watch loads of the things Daglish did, Henry could did everyone of them. If you asked Daglish to take on 4 Galactico's and smash one past Casillas out of nothing, he couldn't.

Did you watch Dalglish often then?

I've watched all the best things he's done as an individual and it doesn't touch Henry.

Ahem.

'Dan lets face it, you've never seen Daglish play and obviously didn't watch Henry either. You're talking shit.'


So, I can't make a judgement because I wasn't alive when Dalglish played, yet you haven't seen him play, yet you can make one?

I don't need to see him play because i've seen all the best things he ever did, compared to what Henry did it doesn't compare. You said he is one of the greatest players ever and you haven't seen him play once. Its ridiculous.

And how Bergkamp isn't on that top ten strikers list is beyond me.

The-Reporter wrote:

Dan wrote:

The-Reporter wrote:

Dan wrote:

The-Reporter wrote:
Dan lets face it, you've never seen Daglish play and obviously didn't watch Henry either. You're talking shit.

If you watch loads of the things Daglish did, Henry could did everyone of them. If you asked Daglish to take on 4 Galactico's and smash one past Casillas out of nothing, he couldn't.

Did you watch Dalglish often then?

I've watched all the best things he's done as an individual and it doesn't touch Henry.

Ahem.

'Dan lets face it, you've never seen Daglish play and obviously didn't watch Henry either. You're talking shit.'


So, I can't make a judgement because I wasn't alive when Dalglish played, yet you haven't seen him play, yet you can make one?

I don't need to see him play because i've seen all the best things he ever did, compared to what Henry did it doesn't compare. You said he is one of the greatest players ever and you haven't seen him play once. Its ridiculous.

I haven't seen Pele or Maradona play either...

Dean wrote:

The-Reporter wrote:

Dean wrote:The Reporter: " Dalglish couldn't do half the things Henry done ".

Take your fucking goggles off.

Could he do what Henry did in that video i posted? I watch a video of him and a better comparison would be Bergkamp. Henry is another level.

Henry on another level to Dalglish?

Now that is laughable.

Mal wrote:Every player is different. Dalglish and Henry were both phenomenal players. Leave it at that.

Exactly.

A bit of common fucking sense.

Dan wrote:

The-Reporter wrote:

Dan wrote:

The-Reporter wrote:

Dan wrote:

Did you watch Dalglish often then?

I've watched all the best things he's done as an individual and it doesn't touch Henry.

Ahem.

'Dan lets face it, you've never seen Daglish play and obviously didn't watch Henry either. You're talking shit.'


So, I can't make a judgement because I wasn't alive when Dalglish played, yet you haven't seen him play, yet you can make one?

I don't need to see him play because i've seen all the best things he ever did, compared to what Henry did it doesn't compare. You said he is one of the greatest players ever and you haven't seen him play once. Its ridiculous.

I haven't seen Pele or Maradona play either...

I guess you would say they are the best ever too... just because somebody else told you they were.

You're a sheep.

The-Reporter wrote:

Dan wrote:

The-Reporter wrote:

Dan wrote:

The-Reporter wrote:
I've watched all the best things he's done as an individual and it doesn't touch Henry.

Ahem.

'Dan lets face it, you've never seen Daglish play and obviously didn't watch Henry either. You're talking shit.'


So, I can't make a judgement because I wasn't alive when Dalglish played, yet you haven't seen him play, yet you can make one?

I don't need to see him play because i've seen all the best things he ever did, compared to what Henry did it doesn't compare. You said he is one of the greatest players ever and you haven't seen him play once. Its ridiculous.

I haven't seen Pele or Maradona play either...

I guess you would say they are the best ever too... just because somebody else told you they were.

You're a sheep.

In my opinion if you put Henry and Dalglish on the same pitch in their primes, Henry would come out looking a better player, but for his time Dalglish was amazing, I think Henry was better though.. still both class.

kyro7 wrote:In my opinion if you put Henry and Dalglish on the same pitch in their primes, Henry would come out looking a better player, but for his time Dalglish was amazing, I think Henry was better though.. still both class.

How can you possibly say that though, you haven't even seen Kenny Dalglish play for fucks sake. I hate that. If you put them on the same pitch Henry would look better. Complete bollocks, you're only saying that because you've seen Henry but never had the Luxury of seeing Dalglish play.

So go on then, give me an in depth analysis of why Henry is better than Dalglish. Thanks.

Dean wrote:

kyro7 wrote:In my opinion if you put Henry and Dalglish on the same pitch in their primes, Henry would come out looking a better player, but for his time Dalglish was amazing, I think Henry was better though.. still both class.

How can you possibly say that though, you haven't even seen Kenny Dalglish play for fucks sake. I hate that. If you put them on the same pitch Henry would look better. Complete bollocks, you're only saying that because you've seen Henry but never had the Luxury of seeing Dalglish play.

So go on then, give me an in depth analysis of why Henry is better than Dalglish. Thanks.

Can't be arsed mate, it's just my feeling.. I wouldn't say it's laughable if someone said Dalglish is better.. they're both amazing I just think Henry was complete.

Dennis Bergkamp > all.


/discussion

Djimi Traore has won more European Cups than all London clubs

/discussion

Dean wrote:

kyro7 wrote:In my opinion if you put Henry and Dalglish on the same pitch in their primes, Henry would come out looking a better player, but for his time Dalglish was amazing, I think Henry was better though.. still both class.

How can you possibly say that though, you haven't even seen Kenny Dalglish play for fucks sake. I hate that. If you put them on the same pitch Henry would look better. Complete bollocks, you're only saying that because you've seen Henry but never had the Luxury of seeing Dalglish play.

So go on then, give me an in depth analysis of why Henry is better than Dalglish. Thanks.

Because Henry would pick up a ball and do something absolutely insane in an instant all by himself. Like the volley goal V United. Like his crazy goal against Madrid away. Like his 45 goals against Liverpool...

You don't have to see Daglish play because you can watch all the greatest things he did.. and then you think about what Henry did and compare.

Dean wrote:

kyro7 wrote:In my opinion if you put Henry and Dalglish on the same pitch in their primes, Henry would come out looking a better player, but for his time Dalglish was amazing, I think Henry was better though.. still both class.

How can you possibly say that though, you haven't even seen Kenny Dalglish play for fucks sake. I hate that. If you put them on the same pitch Henry would look better. Complete bollocks, you're only saying that because you've seen Henry but never had the Luxury of seeing Dalglish play.

So go on then, give me an in depth analysis of why Henry is better than Dalglish. Thanks.

Face it Deano, Dalglish was crap.

I mean, firstly, we never saw him play and are having to rely on the words of those who have. And, it turns out they were lying and Dalglish wasn't actually that good.

Forget his 102 Scottish caps, his 501 Liverpool games, his 6 league titles (when it was harder to win), his 4 league cups, his three European cups, an FA Cup, a Super Cup and 5 Charity Shields during his time in England. It actually turns out that he wasn't that good. He wasn't central to Liverpool, he wasn't the clubs best player.

All those who says he is is either too young to have seen him, or lying to the ones that were too young to have seen him.

kyro7 wrote:

Dean wrote:

kyro7 wrote:In my opinion if you put Henry and Dalglish on the same pitch in their primes, Henry would come out looking a better player, but for his time Dalglish was amazing, I think Henry was better though.. still both class.

How can you possibly say that though, you haven't even seen Kenny Dalglish play for fucks sake. I hate that. If you put them on the same pitch Henry would look better. Complete bollocks, you're only saying that because you've seen Henry but never had the Luxury of seeing Dalglish play.

So go on then, give me an in depth analysis of why Henry is better than Dalglish. Thanks.

Can't be arsed mate, it's just my feeling.. I wouldn't say it's laughable if someone said Dalglish is better.. they're both amazing I just think Henry was complete.

Exactly, you can't be assed, because you've got no evidence or argument to back up what you think. Pretty stupid really. But if that's how you judge players then well, that's your problem.

Charlie George > Kenny Daglish

LFCJordan wrote:Djimi Traore has won more European Cups than all London clubs

/discussion

How many trophies you've won doesn't make you a better player though.

Scored goals out of nowhere.

Annoys me that Dalglish never gets mentioned in peoples 'greatest ever players' and stuff like that. He's left out a lot.

The best way of comparing players is probably individual accolades.

Dan wrote:

Dean wrote:

kyro7 wrote:In my opinion if you put Henry and Dalglish on the same pitch in their primes, Henry would come out looking a better player, but for his time Dalglish was amazing, I think Henry was better though.. still both class.

How can you possibly say that though, you haven't even seen Kenny Dalglish play for fucks sake. I hate that. If you put them on the same pitch Henry would look better. Complete bollocks, you're only saying that because you've seen Henry but never had the Luxury of seeing Dalglish play.

So go on then, give me an in depth analysis of why Henry is better than Dalglish. Thanks.

Face it Deano, Dalglish was crap.

I mean, firstly, we never saw him play and are having to rely on the words of those who have. And, it turns out they were lying and Dalglish wasn't actually that good.

Forget his 102 Scottish caps, his 501 Liverpool games, his 6 league titles (when it was harder to win), his 4 league cups, his three European cups, an FA Cup, a Super Cup and 5 Charity Shields during his time in England. It actually turns out that he wasn't that good. He wasn't central to Liverpool, he wasn't the clubs best player.

All those who says he is is either too young to have seen him, or lying to the ones that were too young to have seen him.

Gary Neville won loads does that make him better than Gerrard?

Jord wrote:Annoys me that Dalglish never gets mentioned in peoples 'greatest ever players' and stuff like that. He's left out a lot.

Hes only mentioned among liverpool fans really tbh

The-Reporter wrote:

Dan wrote:

Dean wrote:

kyro7 wrote:In my opinion if you put Henry and Dalglish on the same pitch in their primes, Henry would come out looking a better player, but for his time Dalglish was amazing, I think Henry was better though.. still both class.

How can you possibly say that though, you haven't even seen Kenny Dalglish play for fucks sake. I hate that. If you put them on the same pitch Henry would look better. Complete bollocks, you're only saying that because you've seen Henry but never had the Luxury of seeing Dalglish play.

So go on then, give me an in depth analysis of why Henry is better than Dalglish. Thanks.

Face it Deano, Dalglish was crap.

I mean, firstly, we never saw him play and are having to rely on the words of those who have. And, it turns out they were lying and Dalglish wasn't actually that good.

Forget his 102 Scottish caps, his 501 Liverpool games, his 6 league titles (when it was harder to win), his 4 league cups, his three European cups, an FA Cup, a Super Cup and 5 Charity Shields during his time in England. It actually turns out that he wasn't that good. He wasn't central to Liverpool, he wasn't the clubs best player.

All those who says he is is either too young to have seen him, or lying to the ones that were too young to have seen him.

Gary Neville won loads does that make him better than Gerrard?

Was Gary Neville central to that success? No.

Was Dalglish? Yes.

I should rename this thread.