Strikers debate. With a Suarez vs Tores poll. :/

B0dunrin wrote:The best way of comparing players is probably individual accolades.

Dean wrote:

kyro7 wrote:

Dean wrote:

kyro7 wrote:In my opinion if you put Henry and Dalglish on the same pitch in their primes, Henry would come out looking a better player, but for his time Dalglish was amazing, I think Henry was better though.. still both class.

How can you possibly say that though, you haven't even seen Kenny Dalglish play for fucks sake. I hate that. If you put them on the same pitch Henry would look better. Complete bollocks, you're only saying that because you've seen Henry but never had the Luxury of seeing Dalglish play.

So go on then, give me an in depth analysis of why Henry is better than Dalglish. Thanks.

Can't be arsed mate, it's just my feeling.. I wouldn't say it's laughable if someone said Dalglish is better.. they're both amazing I just think Henry was complete.

Exactly, you can't be assed, because you've got no evidence or argument to back up what you think. Pretty stupid really. But if that's how you judge players then well, that's your problem.

Dan wrote:

The-Reporter wrote:

Dan wrote:

Dean wrote:

kyro7 wrote:In my opinion if you put Henry and Dalglish on the same pitch in their primes, Henry would come out looking a better player, but for his time Dalglish was amazing, I think Henry was better though.. still both class.

How can you possibly say that though, you haven't even seen Kenny Dalglish play for fucks sake. I hate that. If you put them on the same pitch Henry would look better. Complete bollocks, you're only saying that because you've seen Henry but never had the Luxury of seeing Dalglish play.

So go on then, give me an in depth analysis of why Henry is better than Dalglish. Thanks.

Face it Deano, Dalglish was crap.

I mean, firstly, we never saw him play and are having to rely on the words of those who have. And, it turns out they were lying and Dalglish wasn't actually that good.

Forget his 102 Scottish caps, his 501 Liverpool games, his 6 league titles (when it was harder to win), his 4 league cups, his three European cups, an FA Cup, a Super Cup and 5 Charity Shields during his time in England. It actually turns out that he wasn't that good. He wasn't central to Liverpool, he wasn't the clubs best player.

All those who says he is is either too young to have seen him, or lying to the ones that were too young to have seen him.

Gary Neville won loads does that make him better than Gerrard?

Was Gary Neville central to that success? No.

Was Dalglish? Yes.

B0dunrin wrote:The best way of comparing players is probably individual accolades.

kyro7 wrote:

Dean wrote:

kyro7 wrote:

Dean wrote:

kyro7 wrote:In my opinion if you put Henry and Dalglish on the same pitch in their primes, Henry would come out looking a better player, but for his time Dalglish was amazing, I think Henry was better though.. still both class.

How can you possibly say that though, you haven't even seen Kenny Dalglish play for fucks sake. I hate that. If you put them on the same pitch Henry would look better. Complete bollocks, you're only saying that because you've seen Henry but never had the Luxury of seeing Dalglish play.

So go on then, give me an in depth analysis of why Henry is better than Dalglish. Thanks.

Can't be arsed mate, it's just my feeling.. I wouldn't say it's laughable if someone said Dalglish is better.. they're both amazing I just think Henry was complete.

Exactly, you can't be assed, because you've got no evidence or argument to back up what you think. Pretty stupid really. But if that's how you judge players then well, that's your problem.

No, I can't be arsed because I can't be fucking arsed.. I didn't say what I said was 100 percent fact so I don't need evidence, I just think Henry > Dalglish, what's your fucking problem?

EdinsonCavani wrote:If he put as much effort into his posts as he does with his daily post count then we would be getting 10,000 word essays

kyro7 wrote:

EdinsonCavani wrote:If he put as much effort into his posts as he does with his daily post count then we would be getting 10,000 word essays

Firstly, I'm not having a bad day.

Secondly, yes my post count is high.. but for a while now my posts per day have been going down, and I don't come on this shit hole as often as I used to, because it's a waste of time.

kyro7 wrote:

Dean wrote:

kyro7 wrote:

Dean wrote:

kyro7 wrote:In my opinion if you put Henry and Dalglish on the same pitch in their primes, Henry would come out looking a better player, but for his time Dalglish was amazing, I think Henry was better though.. still both class.

How can you possibly say that though, you haven't even seen Kenny Dalglish play for fucks sake. I hate that. If you put them on the same pitch Henry would look better. Complete bollocks, you're only saying that because you've seen Henry but never had the Luxury of seeing Dalglish play.

So go on then, give me an in depth analysis of why Henry is better than Dalglish. Thanks.

Can't be arsed mate, it's just my feeling.. I wouldn't say it's laughable if someone said Dalglish is better.. they're both amazing I just think Henry was complete.

Exactly, you can't be assed, because you've got no evidence or argument to back up what you think. Pretty stupid really. But if that's how you judge players then well, that's your problem.

No, I can't be arsed because I can't be fucking arsed.. I didn't say what I said was 100 percent fact so I don't need evidence, I just think Henry > Dalglish, what's your fucking problem?

kyro7 wrote:

EdinsonCavani wrote:If he put as much effort into his posts as he does with his daily post count then we would be getting 10,000 word essays

Firstly, I'm not having a bad day.

Secondly, yes my post count is high.. but for a while now my posts per day have been going down, and I don't come on this shit hole as often as I used to, because it's a waste of time.

JMB_94 wrote:

kyro7 wrote:

EdinsonCavani wrote:If he put as much effort into his posts as he does with his daily post count then we would be getting 10,000 word essays

Firstly, I'm not having a bad day.

Secondly, yes my post count is high.. but for a while now my posts per day have been going down, and I don't come on this shit hole as often as I used to, because it's a waste of time.

Well if its that much of a waste of time then i think you have way to much time to kill.

kyro7 wrote:

JMB_94 wrote:

kyro7 wrote:

EdinsonCavani wrote:If he put as much effort into his posts as he does with his daily post count then we would be getting 10,000 word essays

Firstly, I'm not having a bad day.

Secondly, yes my post count is high.. but for a while now my posts per day have been going down, and I don't come on this shit hole as often as I used to, because it's a waste of time.

Well if its that much of a waste of time then i think you have way to much time to kill.

How about you go and fuck yourself?

You always seem to creep out of a corner and have your little comment, so just fuck off.

I clearly said recently I haven't been posting as much because I think it's a waste of time.. which isn't talking about when my postcount was shooting up you stupid fucking prick.

SBSP wrote:

B0dunrin wrote:The best way of comparing players is probably individual accolades.

So Emile Heskey is obviously better than Torres then.

kyro7 wrote:

EdinsonCavani wrote:If he put as much effort into his posts as he does with his daily post count then we would be getting 10,000 word essays

Firstly, I'm not having a bad day.

Secondly, yes my post count is high.. but for a while now my posts per day have been going down, and I don't come on this shit hole as often as I used to, because it's a waste of time.

SBSP wrote:Henrik Larsson > All.

B0dunrin wrote:

SBSP wrote:

B0dunrin wrote:The best way of comparing players is probably individual accolades.

So Emile Heskey is obviously better than Torres then.

There are obviously exceptions
There's no infallible way of comparing footballers.

Dean wrote:

kyro7 wrote:

EdinsonCavani wrote:If he put as much effort into his posts as he does with his daily post count then we would be getting 10,000 word essays

Firstly, I'm not having a bad day.

Secondly, yes my post count is high.. but for a while now my posts per day have been going down, and I don't come on this shit hole as often as I used to, because it's a waste of time.

So ironic you call this place a shit hole and a waste of time and yet you're a poster talking complete nonsense and chatting out your ass.

And also the forum is improving not getting worse. Maybe people just don't bother with you any more because you talk crap.

Mal wrote:

SBSP wrote:Henrik Larsson > All.

Pele >> all. Best goal/game ratio ever.

Dan wrote:

Mal wrote:

SBSP wrote:Henrik Larsson > All.

Pele >> all. Best goal/game ratio ever.

That was Brazil though. Never did it in the EPL.

kyro7 wrote:

JMB_94 wrote:

kyro7 wrote:

EdinsonCavani wrote:If he put as much effort into his posts as he does with his daily post count then we would be getting 10,000 word essays

Firstly, I'm not having a bad day.

Secondly, yes my post count is high.. but for a while now my posts per day have been going down, and I don't come on this shit hole as often as I used to, because it's a waste of time.

Well if its that much of a waste of time then i think you have way to much time to kill.

How about you go and fuck yourself?

You always seem to creep out of a corner and have your little comment, so just fuck off.

I clearly said recently I haven't been posting as much because I think it's a waste of time.. which isn't talking about when my postcount was shooting up you stupid fucking prick.

Mal wrote:

Dan wrote:

Mal wrote:

SBSP wrote:Henrik Larsson > All.

Pele >> all. Best goal/game ratio ever.

That was Brazil though. Never did it in the EPL.

Doesn't matter. 737 goals in 669 appearances is phenomenal anywhere. 77 goals in 92 appearances for Brazil too.

B0dunrin wrote:Wait, has Heskey won a PFA award or something before?(just asking because I said Individual accolades).

JMB_94 wrote:Sorry, im just reading this debate, which i was finding quite interesting, and then you start slagging off this forum and how its a waste of time. Bit rich comnig from someone who has 20,000 posts.

Anyway, im sorry if you're as offended as you are coming across as right now.

Mal wrote:

Dan wrote:

Mal wrote:

SBSP wrote:Henrik Larsson > All.

Pele >> all. Best goal/game ratio ever.

That was Brazil though. Never did it in the EPL.

Doesn't matter. 737 goals in 669 appearances is phenomenal anywhere. 77 goals in 92 appearances for Brazil too.