Alex Ferguson charged by the FA for improper conduct

I find it funny how after the Wigan game Mike Phelan said you can't dispute a referees decision

And then Fergie goes mad the next game

kyro7 wrote:

Santa Cruz wrote:My dad "Like his son Sir Alex is a grade a knob"

OH MY FUCKING GOD HAS YOUR DAD CONSIDERED STAND UP?

FUCKING AMAZING STUFF.

He speaks the truth.

Danny wrote:

Dan wrote:Martinez didn't go on a massive rant about the referee though. That's why Fergie has been charged. Otherwise, managers wouldn't be able to comment about a referee without getting a ban.


It's quite simple. Stop this 'It's only because you don't like us' shite you're peddling all over the place.

Martinez still basically said the referee was bias. That's acceptable now?

He criticised the ref, however, he didn't go on a rant. Fergie did. Had Fergie said the same as Martinez, he wouldn't have been banned. So it's irrelevant.

Sean wrote:I find it funny how after the Wigan game Mike Phelan said you can't dispute a referees decision

And then Fergie goes mad the next game

Mike Phelan and Sir Alex Ferguson are two different people.

Sean wrote:I find it funny how after the Wigan game Mike Phelan said you can't dispute a referees decision

And then Fergie goes mad the next game

inb4 someones says 'but phelan said it not Fergie '

even though Phelan said 'we'..

Dan wrote:

Danny wrote:

Dan wrote:Martinez didn't go on a massive rant about the referee though. That's why Fergie has been charged. Otherwise, managers wouldn't be able to comment about a referee without getting a ban.


It's quite simple. Stop this 'It's only because you don't like us' shite you're peddling all over the place.

Martinez still basically said the referee was bias. That's acceptable now?

He criticised the ref, however, he didn't go on a rant. Fergie did. Had Fergie said the same as Martinez, he wouldn't have been banned. So it's irrelevant.

They've both moaned about the referee, pretty much questioning their integrities. I couldn't give a fuck if Fergie went on a "rant".

If United send Phelan to do post match interviews then he speaks for the club

Careful, if there's anymore criticism of Fergie in here, Fergie might ban you..

luke. wrote:

Sean wrote:I find it funny how after the Wigan game Mike Phelan said you can't dispute a referees decision

And then Fergie goes mad the next game

inb4 someones says 'but phelan said it not Fergie '

even though Phelan said 'we'..

If I say 'we' without the other person being there and agreeing, does that mean they're agreeing?

Danny wrote:

Dan wrote:

Danny wrote:

Dan wrote:Martinez didn't go on a massive rant about the referee though. That's why Fergie has been charged. Otherwise, managers wouldn't be able to comment about a referee without getting a ban.


It's quite simple. Stop this 'It's only because you don't like us' shite you're peddling all over the place.

Martinez still basically said the referee was bias. That's acceptable now?

He criticised the ref, however, he didn't go on a rant. Fergie did. Had Fergie said the same as Martinez, he wouldn't have been banned. So it's irrelevant.

They've both moaned about the referee, pretty much questioning their integrities. I couldn't give a fuck if Fergie went on a "rant".

You couldn't give a fuck because you know you're wrong

Why does Fergie not do MoTD interviews?

Sean wrote:If United send Phelan to do post match interviews then he speaks for the club

But Fergie has always questioned the ref's, like most managers and didn't say that.. so i don't know what you're on about.

The only reason Phelan said we can't question the ref's is because he knew Rooney was out of order.

kyro7 wrote:

luke. wrote:

Sean wrote:I find it funny how after the Wigan game Mike Phelan said you can't dispute a referees decision

And then Fergie goes mad the next game

inb4 someones says 'but phelan said it not Fergie '

even though Phelan said 'we'..

If I say 'we' without the other person being there and agreeing, does that mean they're agreeing?

He's speaking on behalf of the club.

kyro7 wrote:

luke. wrote:

kyro7 wrote:

luke. wrote:

kyro7 wrote:Fergie is right as well.

I never said Fergie's opinion was wrong, so you're talking shit now.

Yeah but Martinez is wrong to come out and call the ref's biased, whether he's right or not, just like Fergie.

But did he attack this ref specifically? No, Did Fergie? Yes.

But it's what he was getting at, any one can see that.. just because Fergie has the balls to say it like it is, Fergie.

That's me done on this, whether he gets a ban or not our players will know what's expected, he'll still pick the team, and it wont matter.

Yes, he definitely had the balls to say it like it is when Rooney elbowed McCarthy.



What a hero, if it wasn't for him Rooney would be playing..

luke. wrote:

Danny wrote:

Dan wrote:

Danny wrote:

Dan wrote:Martinez didn't go on a massive rant about the referee though. That's why Fergie has been charged. Otherwise, managers wouldn't be able to comment about a referee without getting a ban.


It's quite simple. Stop this 'It's only because you don't like us' shite you're peddling all over the place.

Martinez still basically said the referee was bias. That's acceptable now?

He criticised the ref, however, he didn't go on a rant. Fergie did. Had Fergie said the same as Martinez, he wouldn't have been banned. So it's irrelevant.

They've both moaned about the referee, pretty much questioning their integrities. I couldn't give a fuck if Fergie went on a "rant".

You couldn't give a fuck because you know you're wrong

Fergie got it pretty much spot on anyway. Why shouldn't he moan/rant/blah blah blah about the referee? He'd had a crap game (not for the first time against us) and it could end up costing us the title. Along with our bollocks second half performance obviously.

Santa Cruz wrote:Why does Fergie not do MoTD interviews?

BBC pretty said one of his sons (football agents) was involved in that "bungs" shite a few years ago, and haven't apologized. Even though I'm pretty sure the BBC were wrong anyway...

We love Fergie, you hate him.

We've got him, you haven't.

Let us all be happy.

Danny wrote:

Santa Cruz wrote:Why does Fergie not do MoTD interviews?

BBC pretty said one of his sons (football agents) was involved in that "bungs" shite a few years ago, and haven't apologized. Even though I'm pretty sure the BBC were wrong anyway...

What a twat.

Yea but Fergie thinks he's above the rules, he always has.

Danny wrote:

luke. wrote:

Danny wrote:

Dan wrote:

Danny wrote:Martinez still basically said the referee was bias. That's acceptable now?

He criticised the ref, however, he didn't go on a rant. Fergie did. Had Fergie said the same as Martinez, he wouldn't have been banned. So it's irrelevant.

They've both moaned about the referee, pretty much questioning their integrities. I couldn't give a fuck if Fergie went on a "rant".

You couldn't give a fuck because you know you're wrong

Fergie got it pretty much spot on anyway. Why shouldn't he moan/rant/blah blah blah about the referee? He'd had a crap game (not for the first time against us) and it could end up costing us the title. Along with our bollocks second half performance obviously.

Hmm, so why shouldn't I go round shouting at people who walk in front of me very slowly, or if someone bumps into me and why don't I start ranting and shouting at them? Is that deemed acceptable too now? I mean, if Fergie can get away with it, and he's a very famous man, why can't your average Joe do it?

Santa Cruz wrote:

Danny wrote:

Santa Cruz wrote:Why does Fergie not do MoTD interviews?

BBC pretty said one of his sons (football agents) was involved in that "bungs" shite a few years ago, and haven't apologized. Even though I'm pretty sure the BBC were wrong anyway...

What a twat.

Why should he talk to the BBC? They basically said his son's a fraud, or whatever the whole story involved...

Sean wrote:Yea but Fergie thinks he's above the rules, he always has.

So do most people on here.

luke. wrote:

Danny wrote:

luke. wrote:

Danny wrote:

Dan wrote:



He criticised the ref, however, he didn't go on a rant. Fergie did. Had Fergie said the same as Martinez, he wouldn't have been banned. So it's irrelevant.

They've both moaned about the referee, pretty much questioning their integrities. I couldn't give a fuck if Fergie went on a "rant".

You couldn't give a fuck because you know you're wrong

Fergie got it pretty much spot on anyway. Why shouldn't he moan/rant/blah blah blah about the referee? He'd had a crap game (not for the first time against us) and it could end up costing us the title. Along with our bollocks second half performance obviously.

Hmm, so why shouldn't I go round shouting at people who walk in front of me very slowly, or if someone bumps into me and why don't I start ranting and shouting at them? Is that deemed acceptable too now? I mean, if Fergie can get away with it, and he's a very famous man, why can't your average Joe do it?

Oh dear.

Danny wrote:

Santa Cruz wrote:

Danny wrote:

Santa Cruz wrote:Why does Fergie not do MoTD interviews?

BBC pretty said one of his sons (football agents) was involved in that "bungs" shite a few years ago, and haven't apologized. Even though I'm pretty sure the BBC were wrong anyway...

What a twat.

Why should he talk to the BBC? They basically said his son's a fraud, or whatever the whole story involved...

Awww oh well the better MoTD is cus he's not on it but does anyone know if Darren is adopted because he's a shit manager

Luke seriously you're arguments are getting worse each time

luke. wrote:

Danny wrote:

luke. wrote:

Danny wrote:

Dan wrote:



He criticised the ref, however, he didn't go on a rant. Fergie did. Had Fergie said the same as Martinez, he wouldn't have been banned. So it's irrelevant.

They've both moaned about the referee, pretty much questioning their integrities. I couldn't give a fuck if Fergie went on a "rant".

You couldn't give a fuck because you know you're wrong

Fergie got it pretty much spot on anyway. Why shouldn't he moan/rant/blah blah blah about the referee? He'd had a crap game (not for the first time against us) and it could end up costing us the title. Along with our bollocks second half performance obviously.

Hmm, so why shouldn't I go round shouting at people who walk in front of me very slowly, or if someone bumps into me and why don't I start ranting and shouting at them? Is that deemed acceptable too now? I mean, if Fergie can get away with it, and he's a very famous man, why can't your average Joe do it?

I dunno...

I'm torn on this one.

Is that the dumbest argument I've ever heard, or is it just in the top 5 or 6?

menalawyerguy wrote:

luke. wrote:

Danny wrote:

luke. wrote:

Danny wrote:They've both moaned about the referee, pretty much questioning their integrities. I couldn't give a fuck if Fergie went on a "rant".

You couldn't give a fuck because you know you're wrong

Fergie got it pretty much spot on anyway. Why shouldn't he moan/rant/blah blah blah about the referee? He'd had a crap game (not for the first time against us) and it could end up costing us the title. Along with our bollocks second half performance obviously.

Hmm, so why shouldn't I go round shouting at people who walk in front of me very slowly, or if someone bumps into me and why don't I start ranting and shouting at them? Is that deemed acceptable too now? I mean, if Fergie can get away with it, and he's a very famous man, why can't your average Joe do it?

I dunno...

I'm torn on this one.

Is that the dumbest argument I've ever heard, or is it just in the top 5 or 6?

Top 3 or 4 at the very least.

Luke, Luke, Luke

menalawyerguy wrote:

luke. wrote:

Danny wrote:

luke. wrote:

Danny wrote:They've both moaned about the referee, pretty much questioning their integrities. I couldn't give a fuck if Fergie went on a "rant".

You couldn't give a fuck because you know you're wrong

Fergie got it pretty much spot on anyway. Why shouldn't he moan/rant/blah blah blah about the referee? He'd had a crap game (not for the first time against us) and it could end up costing us the title. Along with our bollocks second half performance obviously.

Hmm, so why shouldn't I go round shouting at people who walk in front of me very slowly, or if someone bumps into me and why don't I start ranting and shouting at them? Is that deemed acceptable too now? I mean, if Fergie can get away with it, and he's a very famous man, why can't your average Joe do it?

I dunno...

I'm torn on this one.

Is that the dumbest argument I've ever heard, or is it just in the top 5 or 6?

Surely every reply from AriseForLife in the 'Striker aren't attackers' debate takes up the top 20?

It's true though. If he should get away with it, it doesn't set a very good image for the public, does it?