Society of Black Lawyers: Liverpool&Chelsea condoning racism

Laurencio wrote:

If the economy falls to pieces the immigration stops. Problem solved.

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

mac wrote:

I don't understand what you mean. Are whites not the majority in positions of power and employment in the UK? I don't see anything wrong with that but that's because they are the majority of the UK population.

Although, I can understand where RR is coming from to an extent. It's likely the minority populations don't make up positions of power with respect to their percentage of the population.

Yes, exactly, whites hold a majority in positions of power disproportionate to their majority in the population, and in education. At my university there are about 3 black people on my course, which hundreds of people take.

Lux wrote:

Fonseca wrote:The last thing I said was a question, so I don't know how your spasticated mind got the idea that I was talking shit

You're asking questions that you could easily ask yourself. I'd say you're playing dumb but I'm probably giving you too much credit.

You're boring. I only see you in race related threads and yet all you do is worry about me rather than the actual topic. I don't owe you anything, especially proof....especially when there isn't much or any due to the point I made . The proof is in life, the funny thing is that minorities are the ones who admit these things to me the most.

ahlycotc wrote:No it's not. It's just unnecessary.

Which pretty much sums up society. People standing up for white people is unnecessary.....because obviously we are the racists and nothing unjust happens to us.

If anything, it's needed more than anything else. We are under-represented on all fronts, when we're the majority of the population.

Like I said, it doesn't matter what we (as white people) want.....but as soon as a minority starts to moan it's a big agenda. Doing something for white people is racist, whilst doing the same thing for a minority is the exact opposite (i.e. if you don't do it your racist).

Fonseca wrote:I dislike ignorance, that's all you seem to provide because you're an uneducated cunt who thinks he knows best.

I used to think you were borderline racist, now I've come to realise you're as thick as my walls

Big_Lad_Pardew wrote:Throughout the history of the human race, there has always been the tendency within places of high ethnic diversity, for unrest to break out. It is immensely challenging to fully eradicate ethnic barriers from a society, and achieve a state of complete cohesion. The truth is that the ideals we strive for are unattainable. There will always be us and them.

Fonseca wrote:

Big_Lad_Pardew wrote:Throughout the history of the human race, there has always been the tendency within places of high ethnic diversity, for unrest to break out. It is immensely challenging to fully eradicate ethnic barriers from a society, and achieve a state of complete cohesion. The truth is that the ideals we strive for are unattainable. There will always be us and them.

I picked up my cousin from school the other day (she's 4 and white) and she said a girl had the same bracelet as her, I asked who she was but she didn't know and she said "She wears these really nice bright clothes, she has curly hair, has a brown bag and has a scottish voice". The next day I pick her up again and this girl who was black walks past me with the exact similar clothing, looks and the same bracelet. To me that's just one person from a new generation who feels skin colour's irrelevant, and it gets better every year so there's not much purpose in judging eradication when it only properly started a good 50 years ago

Lux wrote:

Fonseca wrote:I dislike ignorance, that's all you seem to provide because you're an uneducated cunt who thinks he knows best.

I used to think you were borderline racist, now I've come to realise you're as thick as my walls

You done now? I feel sorry for you, if you dislike ignorance you must be cutting your wrist a bit.

No one will ever know what you think, all you do is question people like people care to justify themselves to you.

Big_Lad_Pardew wrote:
I would like to think it is achievable. But that is one 4 year old girl. Not an entire population.

Fonseca wrote:Funny that, I'm not the one working when I should be at Uni studying for a degree

Fonseca wrote:
Even better, you don't know me... I'm far less emotive on here than in real life so you can guess all you like

mac wrote:Well, I think it is inevitably much more likely in the future as society changes.

Fonseca wrote:

Big_Lad_Pardew wrote:Throughout the history of the human race, there has always been the tendency within places of high ethnic diversity, for unrest to break out. It is immensely challenging to fully eradicate ethnic barriers from a society, and achieve a state of complete cohesion. The truth is that the ideals we strive for are unattainable. There will always be us and them.

I picked up my cousin from school the other day (she's 4 and white) and she said a girl had the same bracelet as her, I asked who she was but she didn't know and she said "She wears these really nice bright clothes, she has curly hair, has a brown bag and has a scottish voice". The next day I pick her up again and this girl who was black walks past me with the exact similar clothing, looks and the same bracelet. To me that's just one person from a new generation who feels skin colour's irrelevant, and it gets better every year so there's not much purpose in judging eradication when it only properly started a good 50 years ago

Lux wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:No it's not. It's just unnecessary.

Which pretty much sums up society. People standing up for white people is unnecessary.....because obviously we are the racists and nothing unjust happens to us.

If anything, it's needed more than anything else. We are under-represented on all fronts, when we're the majority of the population.

Like I said, it doesn't matter what we (as white people) want.....but as soon as a minority starts to moan it's a big agenda. Doing something for white people is racist, whilst doing the same thing for a minority is the exact opposite (i.e. if you don't do it your racist).

Anderson=Class wrote:If anyone thinks whites are oppressed in the UK then there clearly to late to help...

CollieBuddz wrote:

Fonseca wrote:

I picked up my cousin from school the other day (she's 4 and white) and she said a girl had the same bracelet as her, I asked who she was but she didn't know and she said "She wears these really nice bright clothes, she has curly hair, has a brown bag and has a scottish voice". The next day I pick her up again and this girl who was black walks past me with the exact similar clothing, looks and the same bracelet. To me that's just one person from a new generation who feels skin colour's irrelevant, and it gets better every year so there's not much purpose in judging eradication when it only properly started a good 50 years ago

How is a 4 year old girl who's afraid to include skin colour in her description for fear of being labelled a racist a sign of things getting better?

Racism will not be gone until we embrace our differences not be afraid to mention them.

ahlycotc wrote:

Lux wrote:

Which pretty much sums up society. People standing up for white people is unnecessary.....because obviously we are the racists and nothing unjust happens to us.

If anything, it's needed more than anything else. We are under-represented on all fronts, when we're the majority of the population.

Like I said, it doesn't matter what we (as white people) want.....but as soon as a minority starts to moan it's a big agenda. Doing something for white people is racist, whilst doing the same thing for a minority is the exact opposite (i.e. if you don't do it your racist).

How can people take you seriously when you say white people are being oppressed and under-represented? Almost all positions of power have and are controlled by your stereotypical old, Christian, Caucasian male.

The reason minorities decide to stick together and protect each other is because they get oppressed or have a history of being oppressed. Go to a country that is not white-majority and you won't see organizations like the Society of Black Lawyers. That's because the majority isn't being oppressed like the minority.

InGlennyWeTrust wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:

How can people take you seriously when you say white people are being oppressed and under-represented? Almost all positions of power have and are controlled by your stereotypical old, Christian, Caucasian male.

The reason minorities decide to stick together and protect each other is because they get oppressed or have a history of being oppressed. Go to a country that is not white-majority and you won't see organizations like the Society of Black Lawyers. That's because the majority isn't being oppressed like the minority.

The President of the United States is black, from a poor background, and not an orthodox Christian.

coolhead33 wrote:It's about 1 fifth of the league season.

Laurencio wrote:I don't get the outrage of the 8 matches ban. It's basically the same time to be out as a broken leg. If anything I would consider it a rather lenient penalty. You have to remember that considering the ban is handled by the FA you could serve your penalty with FA cup games and carling cup games as well. If Suarez had begun serving the penalty the day he got the news he would be back to playing matches before Liverpool's game against ManUtd and the roundup of the season. It really isn't as bad of a punishment as people are making it out to be.

Scratch that he would be back mid january...

ahlycotc wrote:

InGlennyWeTrust wrote:The President of the United States is black, from a poor background, and not an orthodox Christian.

Can you read?

Plus, he didn't come from a poor background. What makes you say that? Is it because he is black?

InGlennyWeTrust wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:

Can you read?

Plus, he didn't come from a poor background. What makes you say that? Is it because he is black?

I would respond to this post, but I can't read.

ahlycotc wrote:

InGlennyWeTrust wrote:I would respond to this post, but I can't read.

Good.