+22
Grenade
Keanoo
Coatsy
Fanatic
dena
Carlos Jenkinson
Kuled
Childish Logic
luke.
The Bat-Man
Mouse
BigAndy9
Zzonked
Jord
Demba Ba
VivaRonaldoLAD
Sean
crump
Scouser_Dave
SBSP
Pippo
Theo Filippo
26 posters
Chelsea agree deal to sign Romelu Lukaku
Fanatic-
- Posts : 4855
It's not unreasonable to think the quotes posted are bullshit, Daily Mail are notorious liars.
VivaRonaldoLAD-
- Posts : 14745
Location : United Road.
Supports : Giggsy 12-0 Gerrard
luke. wrote:Filippo Inzaghi wrote:Luke gets proved wrong on numerous occasions just because Grant (A personal friend of Romans) said he does not interfere does not mean its true.
Proved wrong?
No-one has give ANYTHING to say otherwise.
It's all accusations with no base, at least I can back mine up.
By using the Daily Mail.
Guest- Guest
If you can not understand what has happened here then oh my fucking god.VivaRonaldo wrote:kyro7 wrote:They meant the same thing though, Sean was answering the question where he asked do you think he had no influence, so he said yes.. Luke looked at it as he didn't have an influence on the team so no, they answered it a different way, but they both meant the exact same thing.
Well that's what my belief is.
They both answered the same question with opposite answers
Influence on transfers- One said yes, one said no.
Influence on team selection - One said yes, one said no.
Kuled-
- Posts : 55235
Age : 28
last post on the last page
luke.-
- Posts : 32310
Age : 29
Location : Belfast
Fanatic wrote:It's not unreasonable to think the quotes posted are bullshit, Daily Mail are notorious liars.
http://www.talksport.co.uk/sports-news/football/premier-league/8613/8/exclusive-%E2%80%93-grant-%E2%80%98villas-boas-will-find-it-easy-work-abramovich%E2%80%99
Isn't this Grant's voice?
Coatsy-
- Posts : 3189
Age : 31
kyro7 wrote:If you can not understand what has happened here then oh my fucking god.VivaRonaldo wrote:kyro7 wrote:They meant the same thing though, Sean was answering the question where he asked do you think he had no influence, so he said yes.. Luke looked at it as he didn't have an influence on the team so no, they answered it a different way, but they both meant the exact same thing.
Well that's what my belief is.
They both answered the same question with opposite answers
Influence on transfers- One said yes, one said no.
Influence on team selection - One said yes, one said no.
BigAndy9-
- Posts : 953
Location : Craven Park
Supports : Definatly not Andy Carroll
Chelsea fans
Sean-
- Posts : 33857
Age : 30
Sean wrote:Fucking hell, are you two really that bad.
I'll explain this slowly
Fantatic asked, if we though Abramovich had NO influence on players brough in or team selection
I said NO on players brought in, that means that I believe he had some influence on players brought in. Following so far? Luke in his post, replied in a different sntence structure, not directly answering Fanatics question but expressing a similar opinion to meThis means Luke also thought Abramovich had an influence on players brough in all be it a small onePlayers brought in - Yes, but nowhere near as much as people make it out to be.
Is that clear enough?
I'll go ahead and bump this...
Guest- Guest
Honestly i watched this guy before he had about 8 shots in the game, none of them were on target and one of them hit the post bounced off his face off the cross bar then he volleyed it out for a throw in.
I was like.. (pretend ernie is the tv) srs
I was like.. (pretend ernie is the tv) srs
Last edited by Chris on Sun Aug 07, 2011 1:10 pm; edited 1 time in total
luke.-
- Posts : 32310
Age : 29
Location : Belfast
- Post n°100
Re: Chelsea agree deal to sign Romelu Lukaku
VivaRonaldo wrote:luke. wrote:Filippo Inzaghi wrote:Luke gets proved wrong on numerous occasions just because Grant (A personal friend of Romans) said he does not interfere does not mean its true.
Proved wrong?
No-one has give ANYTHING to say otherwise.
It's all accusations with no base, at least I can back mine up.
By using the Daily Mail.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/latest/2011/06/27/grant-abramovich-easy-to-work-with-115875-23230667/
You can either read that, or listen to him say it with your own ears;
http://www.talksport.co.uk/sports-news/football/premier-league/8613/8/exclusive-%E2%80%93-grant-%E2%80%98villas-boas-will-find-it-easy-work-abramovich%E2%80%99
Fanatic-
- Posts : 4855
- Post n°101
Re: Chelsea agree deal to sign Romelu Lukaku
Does Avram rule out his buddy Roman from butting in with team matters?luke. wrote:Fanatic wrote:It's not unreasonable to think the quotes posted are bullshit, Daily Mail are notorious liars.
http://www.talksport.co.uk/sports-news/football/premier-league/8613/8/exclusive-%E2%80%93-grant-%E2%80%98villas-boas-will-find-it-easy-work-abramovich%E2%80%99
Isn't this Grant's voice?
VivaRonaldoLAD-
- Posts : 14745
Location : United Road.
Supports : Giggsy 12-0 Gerrard
- Post n°102
Re: Chelsea agree deal to sign Romelu Lukaku
luke. wrote:Fanatic wrote:It's not unreasonable to think the quotes posted are bullshit, Daily Mail are notorious liars.
http://www.talksport.co.uk/sports-news/football/premier-league/8613/8/exclusive-%E2%80%93-grant-%E2%80%98villas-boas-will-find-it-easy-work-abramovich%E2%80%99
Isn't this Grant's voice?
Im not sure if you are familiar with Special1TV, but its not hard to imitate Avram Grant's voice.
Also its 3am, Avram Grant is a NO NO at this time.
Guest- Guest
- Post n°103
Re: Chelsea agree deal to sign Romelu Lukaku
but you both answered the same question with different answersSean wrote:Sean wrote:Fucking hell, are you two really that bad.
I'll explain this slowly
Fantatic asked, if we though Abramovich had NO influence on players brough in or team selection
I said NO on players brought in, that means that I believe he had some influence on players brought in. Following so far? Luke in his post, replied in a different sntence structure, not directly answering Fanatics question but expressing a similar opinion to meThis means Luke also thought Abramovich had an influence on players brough in all be it a small onePlayers brought in - Yes, but nowhere near as much as people make it out to be.
Is that clear enough?
I'll go ahead and bump this...
/cunting retard
VivaRonaldoLAD-
- Posts : 14745
Location : United Road.
Supports : Giggsy 12-0 Gerrard
- Post n°104
Re: Chelsea agree deal to sign Romelu Lukaku
Chris wrote:Honestly i watched this guy before he had about 8 shots in the game, none of them were on target and one of them hit the post bounced off his face off the cross bar then he volleyed it out for a throw in.
I was like.. (pretend ernie is the tv) srs
VivaRonaldoLAD-
- Posts : 14745
Location : United Road.
Supports : Giggsy 12-0 Gerrard
- Post n°105
Re: Chelsea agree deal to sign Romelu Lukaku
kyro7 wrote:but you both answered the same question with different answers
Agreed.
luke.-
- Posts : 32310
Age : 29
Location : Belfast
- Post n°106
Re: Chelsea agree deal to sign Romelu Lukaku
Chris watched Lukaku play one game and he didn't play well.
Lukaku = next Heskey.
that's it. Hasn't even played for us yet and we've wasted our money.
Lukaku = next Heskey.
that's it. Hasn't even played for us yet and we've wasted our money.
Sean-
- Posts : 33857
Age : 30
- Post n°107
Re: Chelsea agree deal to sign Romelu Lukaku
And now they are both conveniently ignoring my post. Not surprised really.
VivaRonaldoLAD-
- Posts : 14745
Location : United Road.
Supports : Giggsy 12-0 Gerrard
- Post n°108
Re: Chelsea agree deal to sign Romelu Lukaku
luke. wrote:Chris watched Lukaku play one game and he didn't play well.
Lukaku = next Heskey.
that's it. Hasn't even played for us yet and we've wasted our money.
You're optimistic
Sean wrote:And now they are both conveniently ignoring my post. Not surprised really.
I have nothing to say to your post other than what Kyro said.
SBSP-
- Posts : 50010
- Post n°109
Re: Chelsea agree deal to sign Romelu Lukaku
So, from what I've gathered, VivaRonaldo is an idiot. That all? Ok, cool.
luke.-
- Posts : 32310
Age : 29
Location : Belfast
- Post n°110
Re: Chelsea agree deal to sign Romelu Lukaku
VivaRonaldo wrote:luke. wrote:Chris watched Lukaku play one game and he didn't play well.
Lukaku = next Heskey.
that's it. Hasn't even played for us yet and we've wasted our money.
You're optimisticSean wrote:And now they are both conveniently ignoring my post. Not surprised really.
I have nothing to say to your post other than what Kyro said.
Are you autistic?
Guest- Guest
- Post n°111
Re: Chelsea agree deal to sign Romelu Lukaku
You probably think I was being serious as well.VivaRonaldo wrote:Sean wrote:And now they are both conveniently ignoring my post. Not surprised really.
I have nothing to say to your post other than what Kyro said.
Sean-
- Posts : 33857
Age : 30
- Post n°112
Re: Chelsea agree deal to sign Romelu Lukaku
VivaRonaldo wrote:luke. wrote:Chris watched Lukaku play one game and he didn't play well.
Lukaku = next Heskey.
that's it. Hasn't even played for us yet and we've wasted our money.
You're optimisticSean wrote:And now they are both conveniently ignoring my post. Not surprised really.
I have nothing to say to your post other than what Kyro said.
Are you stupid that you dont realise, that while both have different answers they express the same opinion, are you really that thick? I refuse to believe someone can be that unintelligent.
SBSP-
- Posts : 50010
- Post n°113
Re: Chelsea agree deal to sign Romelu Lukaku
I think you'd have more luck explaining String Theory to a boulder.
VivaRonaldoLAD-
- Posts : 14745
Location : United Road.
Supports : Giggsy 12-0 Gerrard
- Post n°114
Re: Chelsea agree deal to sign Romelu Lukaku
luke. wrote:VivaRonaldo wrote:luke. wrote:Chris watched Lukaku play one game and he didn't play well.
Lukaku = next Heskey.
that's it. Hasn't even played for us yet and we've wasted our money.
You're optimisticSean wrote:And now they are both conveniently ignoring my post. Not surprised really.
I have nothing to say to your post other than what Kyro said.
Are you autistic?
This has nothing to do with Autism.
kyro7 wrote:You probably think I was being serious as well.VivaRonaldo wrote:Sean wrote:And now they are both conveniently ignoring my post. Not surprised really.
I have nothing to say to your post other than what Kyro said.
Whether you were or not, it was true.
BigAndy9-
- Posts : 953
Location : Craven Park
Supports : Definatly not Andy Carroll
- Post n°115
Re: Chelsea agree deal to sign Romelu Lukaku
luke.-
- Posts : 32310
Age : 29
Location : Belfast
- Post n°116
Re: Chelsea agree deal to sign Romelu Lukaku
VivaRonaldo wrote:luke. wrote:VivaRonaldo wrote:luke. wrote:Chris watched Lukaku play one game and he didn't play well.
Lukaku = next Heskey.
that's it. Hasn't even played for us yet and we've wasted our money.
You're optimisticSean wrote:And now they are both conveniently ignoring my post. Not surprised really.
I have nothing to say to your post other than what Kyro said.
Are you autistic?
This has nothing to do with Autism.kyro7 wrote:You probably think I was being serious as well.VivaRonaldo wrote:Sean wrote:And now they are both conveniently ignoring my post. Not surprised really.
I have nothing to say to your post other than what Kyro said.
Whether you were or not, it was true.
Well you fail to understand the concept of sarcasm, one of the problem's caused within the brain by Autism.
Guest- Guest
- Post n°118
Re: Chelsea agree deal to sign Romelu Lukaku
I hope an old naked man runs upto you in the street and starts flinging his shit at your face.VivaRonaldo wrote:Whether you were or not, it was true.
Keanoo-
- Posts : 11774
Age : 31
Supports : Manchester United
- Post n°119
Re: Chelsea agree deal to sign Romelu Lukaku
Chris wrote:Honestly i watched this guy before he had about 8 shots in the game, none of them were on target and one of them hit the post bounced off his face off the cross bar then he volleyed it out for a throw in.
I was like.. (pretend ernie is the tv) srs
VivaRonaldoLAD-
- Posts : 14745
Location : United Road.
Supports : Giggsy 12-0 Gerrard
- Post n°120
Re: Chelsea agree deal to sign Romelu Lukaku
luke. wrote:
Well you fail to understand the concept of sarcasm, one of the problem's caused within the brain by Autism.
I have already said whether it was sarcasm or not, it was true.
|
|