http://thebelgianwaffle.co.uk/?p=896
I may be too late though.
Zzonked wrote:Why are people saying Torres wont be benched? He's already been benched a few times.
VivaRonaldo wrote:Zzonked wrote:Why are people saying Torres wont be benched? He's already been benched a few times.
I doubt Abromovic will bench his 50m striker for an 18-year old.
luke. wrote:VivaRonaldo wrote:Zzonked wrote:Why are people saying Torres wont be benched? He's already been benched a few times.
I doubt Abromovic will bench his 50m striker for an 18-year old.
So it's changed from a fact, to a doubt, has it now?
VivaRonaldo wrote:luke. wrote:VivaRonaldo wrote:Zzonked wrote:Why are people saying Torres wont be benched? He's already been benched a few times.
I doubt Abromovic will bench his 50m striker for an 18-year old.
So it's changed from a fact, to a doubt, has it now?
No it hasnt, that goon would rather see Chelsea suffer than admit that he wasted 50m.
luke. wrote:VivaRonaldo wrote:luke. wrote:VivaRonaldo wrote:Zzonked wrote:Why are people saying Torres wont be benched? He's already been benched a few times.
I doubt Abromovic will bench his 50m striker for an 18-year old.
So it's changed from a fact, to a doubt, has it now?
No it hasnt, that goon would rather see Chelsea suffer than admit that he wasted 50m.
Would he now?
Do you speak to this 'goon' on a regular basis then?
VivaRonaldo wrote:luke. wrote:VivaRonaldo wrote:luke. wrote:VivaRonaldo wrote:
I doubt Abromovic will bench his 50m striker for an 18-year old.
So it's changed from a fact, to a doubt, has it now?
No it hasnt, that goon would rather see Chelsea suffer than admit that he wasted 50m.
Would he now?
Do you speak to this 'goon' on a regular basis then?
I'm his son.
luke. wrote:VivaRonaldo wrote:luke. wrote:VivaRonaldo wrote:luke. wrote:
So it's changed from a fact, to a doubt, has it now?
No it hasnt, that goon would rather see Chelsea suffer than admit that he wasted 50m.
Would he now?
Do you speak to this 'goon' on a regular basis then?
I'm his son.
I'm sure if you were his son, you'd be able to spell your own surname.
VivaRonaldo wrote:luke. wrote:VivaRonaldo wrote:luke. wrote:VivaRonaldo wrote:
No it hasnt, that goon would rather see Chelsea suffer than admit that he wasted 50m.
Would he now?
Do you speak to this 'goon' on a regular basis then?
I'm his son.
I'm sure if you were his son, you'd be able to spell your own surname.
That's how we spell it when we speak about each other
luke. wrote:
I'd recommend you see a therapist right away, I think you may be suffering from schizophrenia.
VivaRonaldo wrote:Zzonked wrote:Why are people saying Torres wont be benched? He's already been benched a few times.
I doubt Abromovic will bench his 50m striker for an 18-year old.
ViVaRooney wrote:Romelu wont even get on the pitch to try and prove himself...
people forgetting drogba? sturridge? anelka?
its not just torres
Sean wrote:Abramovich doesnt pick the team.
VivaRonaldo wrote:Sean wrote:Abramovich doesnt pick the team.
Some of the ex-managers would say otherwise
luke. wrote:VivaRonaldo wrote:Sean wrote:Abramovich doesnt pick the team.
Some of the ex-managers would say otherwise
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2008694/Roman-Abramovich-wont-interfere-Avram-Grant-tells-Andre-Villas-Boas.html
Really now?
Sean wrote:Abramovich doesnt pick the team.
VivaRonaldo wrote:luke. wrote:VivaRonaldo wrote:Sean wrote:Abramovich doesnt pick the team.
Some of the ex-managers would say otherwise
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2008694/Roman-Abramovich-wont-interfere-Avram-Grant-tells-Andre-Villas-Boas.html
Really now?
Daily Mail?
VivaRonaldo wrote:Sean wrote:Abramovich doesnt pick the team.
Some of the ex-managers would say otherwise
luke. wrote:
Do I need to take Grant's quotes out for you?
Sean wrote:VivaRonaldo wrote:Sean wrote:Abramovich doesnt pick the team.
Some of the ex-managers would say otherwise
You think Abramovich walks into the dressing room, and tells the players where they're playing and their role in the game?
luke. wrote:Abramovich personal assistant is obviously here telling us what Roman does Sean. Can't argue with him.
|
|