VivaRonaldo wrote:luke. wrote:
Well you fail to understand the concept of sarcasm, one of the problem's caused within the brain by Autism.
I have already said whether it was sarcasm or not, it was true.
Sean wrote:VivaRonaldo wrote:luke. wrote:Chris watched Lukaku play one game and he didn't play well.
Lukaku = next Heskey.
that's it. Hasn't even played for us yet and we've wasted our money.
You're optimisticSean wrote:And now they are both conveniently ignoring my post. Not surprised really.
I have nothing to say to your post other than what Kyro said.
Are you stupid that you dont realise, that while both have different answers they express the same opinion, are you really that thick? I refuse to believe someone can be that unintelligent.
Nah i watched like 9 games he must have had about 30 shots and one even went down the tunnel i couldn't believe it mate srs.luke. wrote:Chris watched Lukaku play one game and he didn't play well.
Lukaku = next Heskey.
that's it. Hasn't even played for us yet and we've wasted our money.
luke. wrote:VivaRonaldo wrote:luke. wrote:
Well you fail to understand the concept of sarcasm, one of the problem's caused within the brain by Autism.
I have already said whether it was sarcasm or not, it was true.
Why did you say it?
Are you talking to yourself?
VivaRonaldo wrote:luke. wrote:VivaRonaldo wrote:luke. wrote:
Well you fail to understand the concept of sarcasm, one of the problem's caused within the brain by Autism.
I have already said whether it was sarcasm or not, it was true.
Why did you say it?
Are you talking to yourself?
I said it because you seemed to think I can't sense sarcasm.
Do you want me to prove it by using a quote from the Daily Mail?
@sean, interpreted it the wrong way.Fanatic wrote:Does Avram rule out his buddy Roman from butting in with team matters?luke. wrote:Fanatic wrote:It's not unreasonable to think the quotes posted are bullshit, Daily Mail are notorious liars.
http://www.talksport.co.uk/sports-news/football/premier-league/8613/8/exclusive-%E2%80%93-grant-%E2%80%98villas-boas-will-find-it-easy-work-abramovich%E2%80%99
Isn't this Grant's voice?
Sean wrote:Sean wrote:VivaRonaldo wrote:luke. wrote:Chris watched Lukaku play one game and he didn't play well.
Lukaku = next Heskey.
that's it. Hasn't even played for us yet and we've wasted our money.
You're optimisticSean wrote:And now they are both conveniently ignoring my post. Not surprised really.
I have nothing to say to your post other than what Kyro said.
Are you stupid that you dont realise, that while both have different answers they express the same opinion, are you really that thick? I refuse to believe someone can be that unintelligent.
Fanatic wrote:@sean, interpretted it the wrong way.Fanatic wrote:Does Avram rule out his buddy Roman from butting in with team matters?luke. wrote:Fanatic wrote:It's not unreasonable to think the quotes posted are bullshit, Daily Mail are notorious liars.
http://www.talksport.co.uk/sports-news/football/premier-league/8613/8/exclusive-%E2%80%93-grant-%E2%80%98villas-boas-will-find-it-easy-work-abramovich%E2%80%99
Isn't this Grant's voice?
Bump for luke.
VivaRonaldo wrote:Sean wrote:Sean wrote:VivaRonaldo wrote:luke. wrote:Chris watched Lukaku play one game and he didn't play well.
Lukaku = next Heskey.
that's it. Hasn't even played for us yet and we've wasted our money.
You're optimisticSean wrote:And now they are both conveniently ignoring my post. Not surprised really.
I have nothing to say to your post other than what Kyro said.
Are you stupid that you dont realise, that while both have different answers they express the same opinion, are you really that thick? I refuse to believe someone can be that unintelligent.
My friend I've seen enough to know that you are the unintelligent one, now stop quoting yourself.
Sean wrote:VivaRonaldo wrote:Sean wrote:Sean wrote:VivaRonaldo wrote:
You're optimistic
I have nothing to say to your post other than what Kyro said.
Are you stupid that you dont realise, that while both have different answers they express the same opinion, are you really that thick? I refuse to believe someone can be that unintelligent.
My friend I've seen enough to know that you are the unintelligent one, now stop quoting yourself.
Fanatic has acknolwedged he got the wrong end of the stick, you still refusing to?
Thanks for not answering the question. Next time don't point me towards something which doesn't prove ANYTHING you said.luke. wrote:Fanatic wrote:@sean, interpretted it the wrong way.Fanatic wrote:Does Avram rule out his buddy Roman from butting in with team matters?luke. wrote:Fanatic wrote:It's not unreasonable to think the quotes posted are bullshit, Daily Mail are notorious liars.
http://www.talksport.co.uk/sports-news/football/premier-league/8613/8/exclusive-%E2%80%93-grant-%E2%80%98villas-boas-will-find-it-easy-work-abramovich%E2%80%99
Isn't this Grant's voice?
Bump for luke.
I'd say he knows A LOT more about what goes on inside Chelsea then anyone here does.
It's his word over yours every day of the week.
Fanatic wrote:Thanks for not answering the question. Next time don't point me towards something which doesn't prove ANYTHING you said.luke. wrote:Fanatic wrote:@sean, interpretted it the wrong way.Fanatic wrote:Does Avram rule out his buddy Roman from butting in with team matters?luke. wrote:
http://www.talksport.co.uk/sports-news/football/premier-league/8613/8/exclusive-%E2%80%93-grant-%E2%80%98villas-boas-will-find-it-easy-work-abramovich%E2%80%99
Isn't this Grant's voice?
Bump for luke.
I'd say he knows A LOT more about what goes on inside Chelsea then anyone here does.
It's his word over yours every day of the week.
Really? No one else noticed.VivaRonaldo wrote:It appears there may have been a mis-understanding in this thread.
kyro7 wrote:SETTING UP PAUL SCHOLES, HE'S DONE IT AGAIN, AND THEY'VE GOT 3 MANCHESTER UNITED, TALK ABOUT TURNING ON THE STYLE!
Filippo Inzaghi wrote:I get the feeling this thread sparked a argument
14 MINUTES GONE, BREAKTHROUGH FOR MANCHESTER UNITED, AN UNSTOPPABLE SHOT, FROM PAUL SCHOLES.Keanoo wrote:kyro7 wrote:SETTING UP PAUL SCHOLES, HE'S DONE IT AGAIN, AND THEY'VE GOT 3 MANCHESTER UNITED, TALK ABOUT TURNING ON THE STYLE!
STEPS PAST TOURE BUT NOT ZAMBROTTA, GIVEN STRAIGHT TO PAUL SCHOLESSSSSSS! WHAT ABOUT THAT? WHAT ABOUT THAT?
luke. wrote:Fanatic wrote:Do you think Abramovich had no influence whatsoever on what team was picked and players brought in?
Players brought in - Yes, but nowhere near as much as people make it out to be.
Team selection - No.
No because he didn't answer the question to the exact way it was asked, he basically just put Team Selection - No.VivaRonaldo wrote:luke. wrote:Fanatic wrote:Do you think Abramovich had no influence whatsoever on what team was picked and players brought in?
Players brought in - Yes, but nowhere near as much as people make it out to be.
Team selection - No.
This means that he thinks No its not true that he had no influence? Am I correct? Yes.
This would mean he thinks he has infuenced team selection, which I have stated from the start.
|
|
|
