Pedro or Luis Suarez?

Suarez by a mile. He is a much better player than Pedro.

Pedro however suits Barcelona more.

polska. wrote:Suarez by a mile. He is a much better player than Pedro.

Pedro however suits Barcelona more.

No he's not

crump wrote:Pedro starts for Barcelona and scored in a champions league final and won the World Cup.
Suarez plays for Liverpool and scored against Sunderland in the PL and got to the semi-finals of the World Cup.

Pedro

Just seen this post. Embarrassing logic.

Jay wrote:

crump wrote:Pedro starts for Barcelona and scored in a champions league final and won the World Cup.
Suarez plays for Liverpool and scored against Sunderland in the PL and got to the semi-finals of the World Cup.

Pedro

Just seen this post. Embarrassing logic.

Crump is a bit of an idiot.

Yes he is. Suarez is much better. Can't even argue that. I've watched his full season at Ajax and now most games of his at Liverpool, I am convinced Suarez is the second coming of Jesus class.

Pedro

crump wrote:Pedro starts for Barcelona and scored in a champions league final and won the World Cup.
Suarez plays for Liverpool and scored against Sunderland in the PL and got to the semi-finals of the World Cup.

Pedro

I love how every player v player discussion turns into a pointless thread.

Fine Shagger wrote:

wellz wrote:I don't know if Suarez would walk into the Barca 11, but he is currently a better striker than Pedro.

Pedro isn't a striker.

then why are they being compared?

wellz wrote:

Fine Shagger wrote:

wellz wrote:I don't know if Suarez would walk into the Barca 11, but he is currently a better striker than Pedro.

Pedro isn't a striker.

then why are they being compared?

Because Suárez can play as a wide player/deeper forward as well as striker.

Cadbury wrote:

crump wrote:Pedro starts for Barcelona and scored in a champions league final and won the World Cup.
Suarez plays for Liverpool and scored against Sunderland in the PL and got to the semi-finals of the World Cup.

Pedro

I love how every player v player discussion turns into a pointless thread.

So you think that player v player discussions can actually not be pointless? You, sir, are a mad man.

Suarez is a much better goal scorer he's scored a boatload of goals in the dutch league, a few in the world cup, and a few since moving to the EPL. If Pedro wasn't on Barca he wouldn't be as good.

While Suárez is a better player(imo) fluffy he's not a better finisher, no chance.

Pedro is one of, if not the most, clinical players in the world.

Fine Shagger wrote:While Suárez is a better player(imo) fluffy he's not a better finisher, no chance.

Pedro is one of, if not the most, clinical players in the world.

Suarez is a great finisher too though. So it's not like you are loosing much in that department.

You have to give Suarez more time before you judge him. He's only spent half a season in elite football.

polska. wrote:

Fine Shagger wrote:While Suárez is a better player(imo) fluffy he's not a better finisher, no chance.

Pedro is one of, if not the most, clinical players in the world.

Suarez is a great finisher too though. So it's not like you are loosing much in that department.

Agreed, like I said I think Suárez is better, but Pedro is clinical as fuck. Apart from Messi he'd be the player I'd choose if I had to pick one player who had to score to save my life.

Kuled wrote:

Jelavic18|RFC wrote:Suarez by an absolute fucking country mile.

Care to tell us why, new Jela?

Don't know why but this made me laugh.

Fine Shagger wrote:

polska. wrote:

Fine Shagger wrote:While Suárez is a better player(imo) fluffy he's not a better finisher, no chance.

Pedro is one of, if not the most, clinical players in the world.

Suarez is a great finisher too though. So it's not like you are loosing much in that department.

Agreed, like I said I think Suárez is better, but Pedro is clinical as fuck. Apart from Messi he'd be the player I'd choose if I had to pick one player who had to score to save my life.

So you basically saying Pedro is the second best finisher in the world?

chiboygeorge wrote:

Fine Shagger wrote:

polska. wrote:

Fine Shagger wrote:While Suárez is a better player(imo) fluffy he's not a better finisher, no chance.

Pedro is one of, if not the most, clinical players in the world.

Suarez is a great finisher too though. So it's not like you are loosing much in that department.

Agreed, like I said I think Suárez is better, but Pedro is clinical as fuck. Apart from Messi he'd be the player I'd choose if I had to pick one player who had to score to save my life.

So you basically saying Pedro is the second best finisher in the world?

Yes.

I wouldn't say he's the second best in the world, but he's definitely better than Suarez.

Atleast he didn't say Thiago.

I would take either at Arsenal, hard to decide.

Chris wrote:I would take either at Arsenal, hard to decide.

Your nuts then.

Pedro would fit better at Arsenal.

I'd go for Suarez, but in the end I think it may be more clear by the end of this upcoming season.

SBSP wrote:Pedro would fit better at Arsenal.

Oh no no no. Someone like Suarez is who Arsenal need.

Fine Shagger wrote:

chiboygeorge wrote:

Fine Shagger wrote:

polska. wrote:

Fine Shagger wrote:While Suárez is a better player(imo) fluffy he's not a better finisher, no chance.

Pedro is one of, if not the most, clinical players in the world.

Suarez is a great finisher too though. So it's not like you are loosing much in that department.

Agreed, like I said I think Suárez is better, but Pedro is clinical as fuck. Apart from Messi he'd be the player I'd choose if I had to pick one player who had to score to save my life.

So you basically saying Pedro is the second best finisher in the world?

Yes.

I seriously don't know what to say about this...it's not even bias anymore...it's just..

chiboygeorge wrote:

Fine Shagger wrote:

chiboygeorge wrote:

Fine Shagger wrote:

polska. wrote:Suarez is a great finisher too though. So it's not like you are loosing much in that department.

Agreed, like I said I think Suárez is better, but Pedro is clinical as fuck. Apart from Messi he'd be the player I'd choose if I had to pick one player who had to score to save my life.

So you basically saying Pedro is the second best finisher in the world?

Yes.

I seriously don't know what to say about this...it's not even bias anymore...it's just..

http://soccerlens.com/la-liga-statistical-review-barcelona-v-ronaldo/65051/

Rather Pedro at Arsenal tbh. Both will probably be forced to play a wider role and Pedro is much better at that.

Fine Shagger wrote:

chiboygeorge wrote:

Fine Shagger wrote:

chiboygeorge wrote:

Fine Shagger wrote:

Agreed, like I said I think Suárez is better, but Pedro is clinical as fuck. Apart from Messi he'd be the player I'd choose if I had to pick one player who had to score to save my life.

So you basically saying Pedro is the second best finisher in the world?

Yes.

I seriously don't know what to say about this...it's not even bias anymore...it's just..

http://soccerlens.com/la-liga-statistical-review-barcelona-v-ronaldo/65051/

It also says Pedro has a better dribble completion than Ronaldo, Pedro is automatically a better dribbler than Ronaldo.
Also Pedro converted more chances than Messi and Ronaldo...so he's not just the second best...but the best finisher in the world.

Pedro had same passing completion with Iniesta, him and Andres are level on passing.

Suarez is a much better fit for Arsenal.

Plus Arsenal NEEDS Suarez' winning mentality. His mentality alone is enough to make him worth getting at Arsenal. I guarantee you if we bought him in January we would have won the league and not have flopped and bottled so many matches.