Pedro or Luis Suarez?

arsenalap11 wrote:

chiboygeorge wrote:

Filippo Inzaghi wrote:

chiboygeorge wrote:

arsenalap11 wrote:

Didn't he just have an amazing season?

Amazing season my ass, he scored goals but overall Eto'o wasn't Eto'o of 2 seasons before. Amazing season would be in 09/10 season.

His first season where he was on the Wing at Inter, 12 goals in 32.

You sure?

Goals wasn't everything for Eto'o and Inter than season...the way him and Milito played was amazing. Eto'o was much more fantastic and lively 2 seasons before compared to last season. Same thing happened with Milito. Shit last season but amazing 2 seasons before.

I still can't get this. You're seriously saying Eto'o had a shit season last season? I know that stats aren't everything but he improved a lot individually, and out of every Inter player he's the only one that played to the standard he did the season they won the treble.

Shit season compared to one he did in treble season. I know he played alot better individually, but it's weird if you did watch him because throughout the season he didn't look as good as....he was scoring and all that but his overall play didn't look as good as treble season. Like said before he missed some easy chances and just wasn't as clinical to me.

Filippo Inzaghi wrote:

chiboygeorge wrote:

Filippo Inzaghi wrote:

chiboygeorge wrote:

Filippo Inzaghi wrote:His first season where he was on the Wing at Inter, 12 goals in 32.

You sure?

Goals wasn't everything for Eto'o and Inter than season...the way him and Milito played was amazing. Eto'o was much more fantastic and lively 2 seasons before compared to last season. Same thing happened with Milito. Shit last season but amazing 2 seasons before.

Was you referring to that season or 08/09 at Barca

2 season ago - 09/10
last season - 10/11

Fair enough

I dont agree with that, i know goals are not everything but in no way was this year a shit year simply because he missed a few chances.

It's not just missing chances but connection with team mates etc...He might have bettered his stats but his performances especially in top games (Juve as example) was pure disgrace.

Fonseca wrote:

Mutant123 wrote:

crump wrote:Pedro starts for Barcelona and scored in a champions league final and won the World Cup.
Suarez plays for Liverpool and scored against Sunderland in the PL and got to the semi-finals of the World Cup.

Pedro

Spain didn't need Pedro. Uruguay did, without Suarez they wouldn't have made the semi-final end of.

Spain don't need a lot of players, it doesn't take anything anyway from ability though does it. Suarez wasn't needed either

Read my following posts. It was in fact a dig at Suarez because he had to cheat to get Uruguay into the semi-final. I also voted for Pedro.

Been looking for this goal has to be one of my favorites this year

Filippo Inzaghi wrote:Been looking for this goal has to be one of my favorites this year

This I think was his best season performance. The freekick > that goal.

I dont know man they were both amazing

Filippo Inzaghi wrote:I dont know man they were both amazing

They are..

but don't come close to Ibra's vs Fiorentina and Lecce.

Fonseca wrote:

polska. wrote:Suarez is a much better fit for Arsenal.

Plus Arsenal NEEDS Suarez' winning mentality. His mentality alone is enough to make him worth getting at Arsenal. I guarantee you if we bought him in January we would have won the league and not have flopped and bottled so many matches.

Does not play lone striker

no

Suarez as lone striker

He'd be perfect where Walcott is played.

Pedro would be better at Walcott's role

Seems a lot of arsenal fans besides Polska don't really know much about Suarez.

grenade187 wrote:Pedro would be better at Walcott's role

No he wouldn't.
Pedro is great yes, but Suarez was born for the position. The way he finds space in games is unbelievable. He'd give defenses so much trouble and would aid with Arsenal's attacking moves so much...


Gervinho as a converted striker like Henry, Song told to stay back and that team would be unstoppable.

Well we're both entitled to our opinions I just think Pedro is a much better player and he could be one of the top 5 players in the world one day.

grenade187 wrote:Well we're both entitled to our opinions I just think Pedro is a much better player and he could be one of the top 5 players in the world one day.

I wouldn't say that he's a much better player... or a better player at all really although fair enough if that's your opinion.

polska. wrote:

Fonseca wrote:

polska. wrote:Suarez is a much better fit for Arsenal.

Plus Arsenal NEEDS Suarez' winning mentality. His mentality alone is enough to make him worth getting at Arsenal. I guarantee you if we bought him in January we would have won the league and not have flopped and bottled so many matches.

Does not play lone striker

no

Suarez as lone striker

He'd be perfect where Walcott is played.

No, Pedro is better in that position

When the Madridista agrees, it has to be true.

Pedro would be better than Walcott and probably great for the role, but Suarez I feel would do that role AND so much more.

Pedro is a better winger and attacking midfielder, if you don't have anything to debate properly then accept it and move on. Pedro is faster than Suarez? relevant? no.. just like this shitty winning mentality or whatever you're bringing up. Pedro is a winner in every form, not his fault he's in the best team in the world

Blah blah blah Pedro better Suarez blah blah blah

go suck one

No point in arguing with someone who hasn't seen Suarez play

Wasn't Suarez played as lone striker where he played best with Liverpool?

luke. wrote:Wasn't Suarez played as lone striker where he played best with Liverpool?

He hasn't played at his best at Liverpool yet, and I blame that mainly on him being used upfront.

Though Liverpool don't have much of an option, they shouldn't drop Kuyt or someone out of the squad to accommodate him better.

luke. wrote:Wasn't Suarez played as lone striker where he played best with Liverpool?

No, Kuyt was.

polska. wrote:Blah blah blah Pedro better Suarez blah blah blah

go suck one

No point in arguing with someone who hasn't seen Suarez play

You really are thick

Fine Shagger wrote:

luke. wrote:Wasn't Suarez played as lone striker where he played best with Liverpool?

No, Kuyt was.

Oh yah, for which match was that again?

Kuyt has linked up really well with Suarez.

Fonseca wrote:

polska. wrote:Blah blah blah Pedro better Suarez blah blah blah

go suck one

No point in arguing with someone who hasn't seen Suarez play

You really are thick

I'm not going to waste my time. It'd be more pointless than arguing with Luke over Chairs and Lawnmowers or whatever that was about...

polska. wrote:

Fine Shagger wrote:

luke. wrote:Wasn't Suarez played as lone striker where he played best with Liverpool?

No, Kuyt was.

Oh yah, for which match was that again?

Well vs Man Utd when Kuyt got a hat-trick, but it's been Kuyt striker with Suárez drifting about for pretty much every game Carroll hasn't played.

polska. wrote:

Fonseca wrote:

polska. wrote:Blah blah blah Pedro better Suarez blah blah blah

go suck one

No point in arguing with someone who hasn't seen Suarez play

You really are thick

I'm not going to waste my time. It'd be more pointless than arguing with Luke over Chairs and Lawnmowers or whatever that was about...

If I was talking shit you would identify it and easily squash it, but no you're making excuses and acting like a pissy Liverpool fan

Fonseca wrote:

polska. wrote:

Fonseca wrote:

polska. wrote:Blah blah blah Pedro better Suarez blah blah blah

go suck one

No point in arguing with someone who hasn't seen Suarez play

You really are thick

I'm not going to waste my time. It'd be more pointless than arguing with Luke over Chairs and Lawnmowers or whatever that was about...

If I was talking shit you would identify it and easily squash it, but no you're making excuses and acting like a pissy Liverpool fan

He's not a Liverpool fan though.

Roloman4 wrote:

Fonseca wrote:

polska. wrote:

Fonseca wrote:

polska. wrote:Blah blah blah Pedro better Suarez blah blah blah

go suck one

No point in arguing with someone who hasn't seen Suarez play

You really are thick

I'm not going to waste my time. It'd be more pointless than arguing with Luke over Chairs and Lawnmowers or whatever that was about...

If I was talking shit you would identify it and easily squash it, but no you're making excuses and acting like a pissy Liverpool fan

He's not a Liverpool fan though.

"acting like"

If Suarez played for anyone but Liverpool, he'd have a lot more votes.


Hell, if someone in the Liverpool thread had said Pedro was better than Suarez, there would probably be a poll trying to prove them wrong..