'Serie A is boring to watch' - Is this a myth?

menalawyerguy wrote:

Fanatic wrote:

menalawyerguy wrote:

Fanatic wrote:It's also like saying " you don't like peanut butter because you have tasted bread"

No, it's like saying you don't like peanut butter and jelly sandwiches because you have tasted bread.

Couldnlt be bothered to type out all of what you said.

Ah ok. Sorry for being anal.


Anyway, it's not bad logic. If you know you hate bread, then you know a PB&J is going to suck ass.

Perhaps you don't like bread on its own but with the combo of bread and P&J its nice?


Wow, this thread has gone of course.

Uncle John from Jamaica wrote:People here (well mainly the anti English Polska and Mauro) are blasting people for sterotyping Italian football as 'slow' and 'boring', yet seem perfectly happy to resort to their own sterotypes of English 'hoofball'.

I gladly appreciate exceptions like Blackpool, but what stereotypes? It's fact most lower English EPL sides play hoofball.

Fanatic wrote:

Tom wrote:

Fanatic wrote:

Tom wrote:

Fanatic wrote:But, how do you know the League wont appeal to you if you haven't watched the league?

Well for one they represent part of the league which is back onto Dan's point about Hodgson

They don't represent the league. One team is one component of a whole league.

Part of the league... why am i repeating this
Oh wow you're actually arguing something over personal preference, . Dan was smart not to bother

Where did I actually condemn your preference? I didn't so hush up.

Not on my preference, general personal preference. In essence, if this was based on race you'd be playing the prejudice card

The whole thing is about preference, if someone says Scottish people are cunts after meeting them once that's their preference. If someone meets every Scot and concludes they're cunts that's his preference again.

What the fuck is not to get, you're arguing over the sake of an argument come on now

Uncle John from Jamaica wrote:People here (well mainly the anti English Polska and Mauro) are blasting people for sterotyping Italian football as 'slow' and 'boring', yet seem perfectly happy to resort to their own sterotypes of English 'hoofball'.

This

polska. wrote:

Uncle John from Jamaica wrote:People here (well mainly the anti English Polska and Mauro) are blasting people for sterotyping Italian football as 'slow' and 'boring', yet seem perfectly happy to resort to their own sterotypes of English 'hoofball'.

I gladly appreciate exceptions like Blackpool, but what stereotypes? It's fact most lower English EPL sides play hoofball.

Most Italian teams play slowly.

This is easy.

Tom wrote:

Fanatic wrote:

Tom wrote:

Fanatic wrote:

Tom wrote:

Well for one they represent part of the league which is back onto Dan's point about Hodgson

They don't represent the league. One team is one component of a whole league.

Part of the league... why am i repeating this
Oh wow you're actually arguing something over personal preference, . Dan was smart not to bother

Where did I actually condemn your preference? I didn't so hush up.

Not on my preference, general personal preference. In essence, if this was based on race you'd be playing the prejudice card

The whole thing is about preference, if someone says Scottish people are cunts after meeting them once that's their preference. If someone meets every Scot and concludes they're cunts that's his preference again.

What the fuck is not to get, you're arguing over the sake of an argument come on now

No, Im not. you're bringing topics into the equation polar opposite to the one being discussed. it's alright bringing analogies into an argument but if they are not fitting it beats the purpose.

polska. wrote:

Uncle John from Jamaica wrote:People here (well mainly the anti English Polska and Mauro) are blasting people for sterotyping Italian football as 'slow' and 'boring', yet seem perfectly happy to resort to their own sterotypes of English 'hoofball'.

I gladly appreciate exceptions like Blackpool, but what stereotypes? It's fact most lower English EPL sides play hoofball.

This is where you make yourself look like a dick. How is it a fact?

Fanatic wrote:

menalawyerguy wrote:

Fanatic wrote:

menalawyerguy wrote:

Fanatic wrote:It's also like saying " you don't like peanut butter because you have tasted bread"

No, it's like saying you don't like peanut butter and jelly sandwiches because you have tasted bread.

Couldnlt be bothered to type out all of what you said.

Ah ok. Sorry for being anal.


Anyway, it's not bad logic. If you know you hate bread, then you know a PB&J is going to suck ass.

Perhaps you don't like bread on its own but with the combo of bread and P&J its nice?


Wow, this thread has gone of course.

maybe you're allergic to peanuts.

menalawyerguy wrote:

Fanatic wrote:

menalawyerguy wrote:

Fanatic wrote:

menalawyerguy wrote:

No, it's like saying you don't like peanut butter and jelly sandwiches because you have tasted bread.

Couldnlt be bothered to type out all of what you said.

Ah ok. Sorry for being anal.


Anyway, it's not bad logic. If you know you hate bread, then you know a PB&J is going to suck ass.

Perhaps you don't like bread on its own but with the combo of bread and P&J its nice?


Wow, this thread has gone of course.

maybe you're allergic to peanuts.

And maybe you're not.

Fanatic wrote:

Tom wrote:

Fanatic wrote:

Tom wrote:

Fanatic wrote:They don't represent the league. One team is one component of a whole league.

Part of the league... why am i repeating this
Oh wow you're actually arguing something over personal preference, . Dan was smart not to bother

Where did I actually condemn your preference? I didn't so hush up.

Not on my preference, general personal preference. In essence, if this was based on race you'd be playing the prejudice card

The whole thing is about preference, if someone says Scottish people are cunts after meeting them once that's their preference. If someone meets every Scot and concludes they're cunts that's his preference again.

What the fuck is not to get, you're arguing over the sake of an argument come on now

No, Im not. you're bringing topics into the equation polar opposite to the one being discussed. it's alright bringing analogies into an argument but if they are not fitting it beats the purpose.

It's perfectly adequate in relation to the topic, if i think the Bundesliga is shit why do i have to watch more games? that's my personal choice which i highlighted with the use of I THINK..

If i was going to argue that it is shit in general i would use factual evidence to get that idea across without preference

There's your difference

If someone says that about Scot's then the person saying it is a cunt, but that doesn't change his personal preference

Uncle John from Jamaica wrote:

polska. wrote:

Uncle John from Jamaica wrote:People here (well mainly the anti English Polska and Mauro) are blasting people for sterotyping Italian football as 'slow' and 'boring', yet seem perfectly happy to resort to their own sterotypes of English 'hoofball'.

I gladly appreciate exceptions like Blackpool, but what stereotypes? It's fact most lower English EPL sides play hoofball.

Most Italian teams play slowly.

This is easy.

Most Italian teams do play slower tempo. Your right Uncle John!

Fanatic wrote:

polska. wrote:

Uncle John from Jamaica wrote:People here (well mainly the anti English Polska and Mauro) are blasting people for sterotyping Italian football as 'slow' and 'boring', yet seem perfectly happy to resort to their own sterotypes of English 'hoofball'.

I gladly appreciate exceptions like Blackpool, but what stereotypes? It's fact most lower English EPL sides play hoofball.

This is where you make yourself look like a dick. How is it a fact?

If you disagree, care to bring some actual statistics that prove me otherwise to the table?

polska. wrote:

Uncle John from Jamaica wrote:

polska. wrote:

Uncle John from Jamaica wrote:People here (well mainly the anti English Polska and Mauro) are blasting people for sterotyping Italian football as 'slow' and 'boring', yet seem perfectly happy to resort to their own sterotypes of English 'hoofball'.

I gladly appreciate exceptions like Blackpool, but what stereotypes? It's fact most lower English EPL sides play hoofball.

Most Italian teams play slowly.

This is easy.

Most Italian teams do play slower tempo. Your right Uncle John!

Italian League is slow and shit. Fact.

Fanatic wrote:

polska. wrote:

Uncle John from Jamaica wrote:

polska. wrote:

Uncle John from Jamaica wrote:People here (well mainly the anti English Polska and Mauro) are blasting people for sterotyping Italian football as 'slow' and 'boring', yet seem perfectly happy to resort to their own sterotypes of English 'hoofball'.

I gladly appreciate exceptions like Blackpool, but what stereotypes? It's fact most lower English EPL sides play hoofball.

Most Italian teams play slowly.

This is easy.

Most Italian teams do play slower tempo. Your right Uncle John!

Italian League is slow and shit. Fact.

2-2, Arteta.

polska. wrote:

Fanatic wrote:

polska. wrote:

Uncle John from Jamaica wrote:People here (well mainly the anti English Polska and Mauro) are blasting people for sterotyping Italian football as 'slow' and 'boring', yet seem perfectly happy to resort to their own sterotypes of English 'hoofball'.

I gladly appreciate exceptions like Blackpool, but what stereotypes? It's fact most lower English EPL sides play hoofball.

This is where you make yourself look like a dick. How is it a fact?

If you disagree, care to bring some actual statistics that prove me otherwise to the table?

Care to bring stats which prove most lower Prem teams play hoofball?

polska. wrote:

Uncle John from Jamaica wrote:People here (well mainly the anti English Polska and Mauro) are blasting people for sterotyping Italian football as 'slow' and 'boring', yet seem perfectly happy to resort to their own sterotypes of English 'hoofball'.

I gladly appreciate exceptions like Blackpool, but what stereotypes? It's fact most lower English EPL sides play hoofball.

Is no a facht!

Tom wrote:

Fanatic wrote:

Tom wrote:

Fanatic wrote:

Tom wrote:

Part of the league... why am i repeating this
Oh wow you're actually arguing something over personal preference, . Dan was smart not to bother

Where did I actually condemn your preference? I didn't so hush up.

Not on my preference, general personal preference. In essence, if this was based on race you'd be playing the prejudice card

The whole thing is about preference, if someone says Scottish people are cunts after meeting them once that's their preference. If someone meets every Scot and concludes they're cunts that's his preference again.

What the fuck is not to get, you're arguing over the sake of an argument come on now

No, Im not. you're bringing topics into the equation polar opposite to the one being discussed. it's alright bringing analogies into an argument but if they are not fitting it beats the purpose.

It's perfectly adequate in relation to the topic, if i think the Bundesliga is shit why do i have to watch more games? that's my personal choice which i highlighted with the use of I THINK..

If i was going to argue that it is shit in general i would use factual evidence to get that idea across without preference

There's your difference

If someone says that about Scot's then the person saying it is a cunt, but that doesn't change his personal preference

"think"

There we go, I also think you cannot judge a whole league based on a couple of matches.

Fanatic wrote:

polska. wrote:

Fanatic wrote:

polska. wrote:

Uncle John from Jamaica wrote:People here (well mainly the anti English Polska and Mauro) are blasting people for sterotyping Italian football as 'slow' and 'boring', yet seem perfectly happy to resort to their own sterotypes of English 'hoofball'.

I gladly appreciate exceptions like Blackpool, but what stereotypes? It's fact most lower English EPL sides play hoofball.

This is where you make yourself look like a dick. How is it a fact?

If you disagree, care to bring some actual statistics that prove me otherwise to the table?

Care to bring stats which prove most lower Prem teams play hoofball?

I'm the one that is making a point. Your the one disagreeing with me. Since you disagree with me, you go ahead and prove me otherwise.

but since I am so nice, there is a cute wittle graph that shows how many long passes (over x meters can't remember) each team committed this season.

Jay.Davies11 wrote:

polska. wrote:

Uncle John from Jamaica wrote:People here (well mainly the anti English Polska and Mauro) are blasting people for sterotyping Italian football as 'slow' and 'boring', yet seem perfectly happy to resort to their own sterotypes of English 'hoofball'.

I gladly appreciate exceptions like Blackpool, but what stereotypes? It's fact most lower English EPL sides play hoofball.

Is no a facht!

Your right indeed. Some top half sides like Liverpool and Tottenham have played lots of hoofball this season.

polska. wrote:

Fanatic wrote:

polska. wrote:

Fanatic wrote:

polska. wrote:I gladly appreciate exceptions like Blackpool, but what stereotypes? It's fact most lower English EPL sides play hoofball.

This is where you make yourself look like a dick. How is it a fact?

If you disagree, care to bring some actual statistics that prove me otherwise to the table?

Care to bring stats which prove most lower Prem teams play hoofball?

I'm the one that is making a point. Your the one disagreeing with me. Since you disagree with me, you go ahead and prove me otherwise.

but since I am so nice, there is a cute wittle graph that shows how many long passes (over x meters can't remember) each team committed this season.

It's all well and good saying what there is....but where exactly is it?


here's my ferrari...

Fanatic wrote:

polska. wrote:

Fanatic wrote:

polska. wrote:

Fanatic wrote:This is where you make yourself look like a dick. How is it a fact?

If you disagree, care to bring some actual statistics that prove me otherwise to the table?

Care to bring stats which prove most lower Prem teams play hoofball?

I'm the one that is making a point. Your the one disagreeing with me. Since you disagree with me, you go ahead and prove me otherwise.

but since I am so nice, there is a cute wittle graph that shows how many long passes (over x meters can't remember) each team committed this season.

It's all well and good saying what there is....but where exactly is it?


here's my ferrari...

It's been posted many times. Many people have seen it as well if that is enough proof it exists. A quick google search should find it.

polska. wrote:

Fanatic wrote:

polska. wrote:

Fanatic wrote:

polska. wrote:

If you disagree, care to bring some actual statistics that prove me otherwise to the table?

Care to bring stats which prove most lower Prem teams play hoofball?

I'm the one that is making a point. Your the one disagreeing with me. Since you disagree with me, you go ahead and prove me otherwise.

but since I am so nice, there is a cute wittle graph that shows how many long passes (over x meters can't remember) each team committed this season.

It's all well and good saying what there is....but where exactly is it?


here's my ferrari...

It's been posted many times. Many people have seen it as well if that is enough proof it exists. A quick google search should find it.

Computer says no.


How can you actually prove something when you haven't provided sufficient enough info to actually prove it?
Saying that there is something which can prove it is not enough (btw, I think your chatting bullshit)

Fanatic wrote:

polska. wrote:

Fanatic wrote:

polska. wrote:

Fanatic wrote: Care to bring stats which prove most lower Prem teams play hoofball?

I'm the one that is making a point. Your the one disagreeing with me. Since you disagree with me, you go ahead and prove me otherwise.

but since I am so nice, there is a cute wittle graph that shows how many long passes (over x meters can't remember) each team committed this season.

It's all well and good saying what there is....but where exactly is it?


here's my ferrari...

It's been posted many times. Many people have seen it as well if that is enough proof it exists. A quick google search should find it.

Computer says no.

Whatev then. I'm not the one who disagrees with my post, so I don't need to prove myself right, and am too much of a lazy cunt to do so anyways.

So let's just agree you concede and I win.

Fanatic wrote:

Tom wrote:

Fanatic wrote:

Tom wrote:

Fanatic wrote:Where did I actually condemn your preference? I didn't so hush up.

Not on my preference, general personal preference. In essence, if this was based on race you'd be playing the prejudice card

The whole thing is about preference, if someone says Scottish people are cunts after meeting them once that's their preference. If someone meets every Scot and concludes they're cunts that's his preference again.

What the fuck is not to get, you're arguing over the sake of an argument come on now

No, Im not. you're bringing topics into the equation polar opposite to the one being discussed. it's alright bringing analogies into an argument but if they are not fitting it beats the purpose.

It's perfectly adequate in relation to the topic, if i think the Bundesliga is shit why do i have to watch more games? that's my personal choice which i highlighted with the use of I THINK..

If i was going to argue that it is shit in general i would use factual evidence to get that idea across without preference

There's your difference

If someone says that about Scot's then the person saying it is a cunt, but that doesn't change his personal preference

"think"

There we go, I also think you cannot judge a whole league based on a couple of matches.

The argument isn't about whether you personally think you cannot judge a whole league based on a couple of matches, it's about how I personally feel about the league and why you think it's wrong. Why you think it's wrong means fuck all considering that's my personal preference. That is why you're arguing a lost cause

Fanatic wrote:

polska. wrote:

Fanatic wrote:

polska. wrote:

Fanatic wrote: Care to bring stats which prove most lower Prem teams play hoofball?

I'm the one that is making a point. Your the one disagreeing with me. Since you disagree with me, you go ahead and prove me otherwise.

but since I am so nice, there is a cute wittle graph that shows how many long passes (over x meters can't remember) each team committed this season.

It's all well and good saying what there is....but where exactly is it?


here's my ferrari...

It's been posted many times. Many people have seen it as well if that is enough proof it exists. A quick google search should find it.

Computer says no.


How can you actually prove something when you haven't provided sufficient enough info to actually prove it?
Saying that there is something which can prove it is not enough (btw, I think your chatting bullshit)

ooh look you edited your post. yay me.

I'm not proving anything. I made a point and it's your decision to call me out on it. But if you do, you better have something to back yourself up or else you prove nothing I said wrong.

I even help you out by saying such a graph exists and you can find it yourself. I'm not chatting bullshit, like I said, it's been posted many times on this forum, especially in the Arsenal thread. I am sure someone else like Tom has seen it himself.

polska. wrote:

Fanatic wrote:

polska. wrote:

Fanatic wrote:

polska. wrote:I'm the one that is making a point. Your the one disagreeing with me. Since you disagree with me, you go ahead and prove me otherwise.

but since I am so nice, there is a cute wittle graph that shows how many long passes (over x meters can't remember) each team committed this season.

It's all well and good saying what there is....but where exactly is it?


here's my ferrari...

It's been posted many times. Many people have seen it as well if that is enough proof it exists. A quick google search should find it.

Computer says no.


How can you actually prove something when you haven't provided sufficient enough info to actually prove it?
Saying that there is something which can prove it is not enough (btw, I think your chatting bullshit)

ooh look you edited your post. yay me.

I'm not proving anything. I made a point and it's your decision to call me out on it. But if you do, you better have something to back yourself up or else you prove nothing I said wrong.

I even help you out by saying such a graph exists and you can find it yourself. I'm not chatting bullshit, like I said, it's been posted many times on this forum, especially in the Arsenal thread. I am sure someone else like Tom has seen it himself.

You mae a statement which I have called you out on because It's bullshit Imo. Surely if you say it you must be able to prove it?....

Fanatic wrote:

polska. wrote:

Fanatic wrote:

polska. wrote:

Fanatic wrote:It's all well and good saying what there is....but where exactly is it?


here's my ferrari...

It's been posted many times. Many people have seen it as well if that is enough proof it exists. A quick google search should find it.

Computer says no.


How can you actually prove something when you haven't provided sufficient enough info to actually prove it?
Saying that there is something which can prove it is not enough (btw, I think your chatting bullshit)

ooh look you edited your post. yay me.

I'm not proving anything. I made a point and it's your decision to call me out on it. But if you do, you better have something to back yourself up or else you prove nothing I said wrong.

I even help you out by saying such a graph exists and you can find it yourself. I'm not chatting bullshit, like I said, it's been posted many times on this forum, especially in the Arsenal thread. I am sure someone else like Tom has seen it himself.

You mae a statement which I have called you out on because It's bullshit Imo. Surely if you say it you must be able to prove it?....

That's not how an argument works. I made a statement and will happily go on with my day unless you can prove my statement wrong. Until then whether you find it bullshit or not means nothing to me or to anyone reading this.

polska. wrote:

Fanatic wrote:

polska. wrote:

Fanatic wrote:

polska. wrote:It's been posted many times. Many people have seen it as well if that is enough proof it exists. A quick google search should find it.

Computer says no.


How can you actually prove something when you haven't provided sufficient enough info to actually prove it?
Saying that there is something which can prove it is not enough (btw, I think your chatting bullshit)

ooh look you edited your post. yay me.

I'm not proving anything. I made a point and it's your decision to call me out on it. But if you do, you better have something to back yourself up or else you prove nothing I said wrong.

I even help you out by saying such a graph exists and you can find it yourself. I'm not chatting bullshit, like I said, it's been posted many times on this forum, especially in the Arsenal thread. I am sure someone else like Tom has seen it himself.

You mae a statement which I have called you out on because It's bullshit Imo. Surely if you say it you must be able to prove it?....

That's not how an argument works. I made a statement and will happily go on with my day unless you can prove my statement wrong. Until then whether you find it bullshit or not means nothing to me or to anyone reading this.

LOL, there's no exact ruling on how an argument should or should not work.

I'm going to smoke a spilff now, my head hurts.

Your right and wrong at the same time. An argument has no rules but has some general guidelines to follow or else it'd just be pointless.

If I had to defend the comments I made, that would be a debate, not an argument.