Forest wrote:Did Pip really say that?
Yeah.
Forest wrote:Did Pip really say that?
luke. wrote:Dan wrote:luke. wrote:Dan wrote:luke. wrote:
Bridge wasn't even in the running for the WC squad anyway, and had barely played before it so it doesn't make much difference, you're just making Terry sound bad to make your argument sound stronger.
Who's a better captain for the Wales game then?
Doesn't matter if he was in the running or not. Point is, if there was an injury, he'd be in. Now, we have to look at other options that might not be as good. You're just trying to belittle my argument because you know it makes sense.
As for Wales. Ferdinand, the current England captain.
I've got a question. Why should Ferdinand lose the captaincy?
Ferdinand won't be fit for Wales.
Also, Cole, Baines, Warnock, Gibbs >>>>>>>>>>>> Bridge.
In your opinion.
Seemingly in Capello's opinion too.
Dan wrote:luke. wrote:Dan wrote:luke. wrote:Dan wrote:
Doesn't matter if he was in the running or not. Point is, if there was an injury, he'd be in. Now, we have to look at other options that might not be as good. You're just trying to belittle my argument because you know it makes sense.
As for Wales. Ferdinand, the current England captain.
I've got a question. Why should Ferdinand lose the captaincy?
Ferdinand won't be fit for Wales.
Also, Cole, Baines, Warnock, Gibbs >>>>>>>>>>>> Bridge.
In your opinion.
Seemingly in Capello's opinion too.
Is it? Considering Gibbs was only called-up after Bridge retired, and one of Warnock's two caps was as a late replacement for Bridge, I don't think it is.
GK01 wrote:blackskar wrote:luke. wrote:Yeah, but is Wilshere really captain material at the moment?
I don't think so.
No one in the NT is though really.
Daws
luke. wrote:Dan wrote:luke. wrote:Dan wrote:luke. wrote:
Ferdinand won't be fit for Wales.
Also, Cole, Baines, Warnock, Gibbs >>>>>>>>>>>> Bridge.
In your opinion.
Seemingly in Capello's opinion too.
Is it? Considering Gibbs was only called-up after Bridge retired, and one of Warnock's two caps was as a late replacement for Bridge, I don't think it is.
That's barely concrete evidence Bridge would have been called up.
Especially when Gibbs was called at a time when the media were calling for a 'new generation'
Dan wrote:luke. wrote:Dan wrote:luke. wrote:Dan wrote:
In your opinion.
Seemingly in Capello's opinion too.
Is it? Considering Gibbs was only called-up after Bridge retired, and one of Warnock's two caps was as a late replacement for Bridge, I don't think it is.
That's barely concrete evidence Bridge would have been called up.
Especially when Gibbs was called at a time when the media were calling for a 'new generation'
No, it's evidence that disproves your theory that Capello preferred Gibbs and Warnock. I never said anything about him being called up. Keep twisting my words to add to your argument though..
luke. wrote:There was barely any plea from Capello to stop Bridge from retiring IIRC
blackskar wrote:luke. wrote:There was barely any plea from Capello to stop Bridge from retiring IIRC
He asked Bridge to come out of it. Pretty sure he even met face to face about it. Bridge said no.
Luke your argument is pure crap just stop.
blackskar wrote:luke. wrote:There was barely any plea from Capello to stop Bridge from retiring IIRC
He asked Bridge to come out of it. Pretty sure he even met face to face about it. Bridge said no.
Luke your argument is pure crap just stop.
luke. wrote:blackskar wrote:luke. wrote:There was barely any plea from Capello to stop Bridge from retiring IIRC
He asked Bridge to come out of it. Pretty sure he even met face to face about it. Bridge said no.
Luke your argument is pure crap just stop.
Hence why I said IIRC..
luke. wrote:Dan wrote:luke. wrote:Dan wrote:luke. wrote:
Seemingly in Capello's opinion too.
Is it? Considering Gibbs was only called-up after Bridge retired, and one of Warnock's two caps was as a late replacement for Bridge, I don't think it is.
That's barely concrete evidence Bridge would have been called up.
Especially when Gibbs was called at a time when the media were calling for a 'new generation'
No, it's evidence that disproves your theory that Capello preferred Gibbs and Warnock. I never said anything about him being called up. Keep twisting my words to add to your argument though..
It's not evidence.
If you were to use that as evidence in court it would barely be strong enough to hold a case.
Unless Capello said himself he'd have liked Bridge to come out of retirement.
There was barely any plea from Capello to stop Bridge from retiring IIRC
Forest wrote:I'd much rather have Terry in the squad for a World Cup than Bridge, who wouldn't of even got on the pitch anyway as Cole was our best player
Tom wrote:Let me get this straight..
Bridge breaks up with wife?
Terry cheats on his wife with Bridge's ex wife?
Dan wrote:Forest wrote:I'd much rather have Terry in the squad for a World Cup than Bridge, who wouldn't of even got on the pitch anyway as Cole was our best player
That isn't the point though is it? If Cole is out, we've got Baines. Then who do we have to back him up? Gibbs and Warnock. I'd prefer Bridge.
LFCJordan wrote:Tom wrote:Let me get this straight..
Bridge breaks up with wife?
Terry cheats on his wife with Bridge's ex wife?
Bridge was still with the ex, whileTerry did it.
Forest wrote:Dan wrote:Forest wrote:I'd much rather have Terry in the squad for a World Cup than Bridge, who wouldn't of even got on the pitch anyway as Cole was our best player
That isn't the point though is it? If Cole is out, we've got Baines. Then who do we have to back him up? Gibbs and Warnock. I'd prefer Bridge.
Konchesky
luke. wrote:
Our best captain shouldn't be captaining the squad
NGreat wrote:luke. wrote:
Our best captain shouldn't be captaining the squad
Problem with that statistic is, Terry's played the least games.
Say we put Wilshere as captain, he plays two games, we win the both. That means we have a 100% win rate with him as captain. Would that make him the best captain we've ever had?
No, don't be a fucking retard
Dan wrote:Forest wrote:Dan wrote:Forest wrote:I'd much rather have Terry in the squad for a World Cup than Bridge, who wouldn't of even got on the pitch anyway as Cole was our best player
That isn't the point though is it? If Cole is out, we've got Baines. Then who do we have to back him up? Gibbs and Warnock. I'd prefer Bridge.
Konchesky
At his level now.
Dan wrote:Forest wrote:I'd much rather have Terry in the squad for a World Cup than Bridge, who wouldn't of even got on the pitch anyway as Cole was our best player
That isn't the point though is it? If Cole is out, we've got Baines. Then who do we have to back him up? Gibbs and Warnock. I'd prefer Bridge.
Luxz0rz wrote:I'd give the armband back to Terry......this snubbing of the best natural leader on the pitch is childish. None of the other footballers give a shit about the drama and tbh I don't care either as long as he does the job on the pitch.Dan wrote:Forest wrote:I'd much rather have Terry in the squad for a World Cup than Bridge, who wouldn't of even got on the pitch anyway as Cole was our best player
That isn't the point though is it? If Cole is out, we've got Baines. Then who do we have to back him up? Gibbs and Warnock. I'd prefer Bridge.
Bridge is fucking shit I'd definitely rather have Gibbs not only is he a massive talent he's probably better already.
luke. wrote:NGreat wrote:luke. wrote:
Our best captain shouldn't be captaining the squad
Problem with that statistic is, Terry's played the least games.
Say we put Wilshere as captain, he plays two games, we win the both. That means we have a 100% win rate with him as captain. Would that make him the best captain we've ever had?
No, don't be a fucking retard
Hence the, 'of the captains who have played the most games'.
slipped on his arse which led to park's goal.blackskar wrote:Gibbs