I guess Lallana and Can must be better.
The Zlatan wrote:ZlatanFabregas, my roots, #REKT
nahh you definitely had Robin or van or something in your username.The Zlatan wrote:ZlatanFabregas, my roots, #REKT
Zzonked wrote:The Zlatan wrote:ZlatanFabregas, my roots, #REKT
Kuled wrote:nahh you definitely had Robin or van or something in your username.The Zlatan wrote:ZlatanFabregas, my roots, #REKT
We already have better players in that position.Keyser Söze wrote:Surprised Liverpool didn't sign him. What better way to send out a message that they can attract "CL quality", and didn't Scott say journalists had Liverpool as favourites a few weeks ago?
Depth, my friend. Allen, Henderson, Gerrard, Coutinho, Sterling, Lucas + Fabregas > Allen, Henderson, Gerrard, Coutinho, Sterling, Lucas.Glen Miller wrote:We already have better players in that position.Keyser Söze wrote:Surprised Liverpool didn't sign him. What better way to send out a message that they can attract "CL quality", and didn't Scott say journalists had Liverpool as favourites a few weeks ago?
Scott_LFC wrote:Suarez, Sturridge, Lambert and Borini > Suarez, Sturridge and Borini.
Theo Filippo wrote:Nasri and Clichy still considered good.
Jesus Christ. He'd compete with Ramsey for a starting spot and Ramsey is streets ahead of the current Fabregas.Theo Filippo wrote:
Cole wouldn't get into our team
Obviously Sagna currently is that's not saying much, he's literally just left.
Rvp, yeah clear as day.
Competing doesn't really mean much either every right back in the league would compete with Flanagan or Jenkinson for a right-back slot for example are we all mugs for not getting in Lowton?
Cazorla in the 12/13 season is streets ahead of any Nasri and still better this season than Nasri.
If Fabregas would've started for Arsenal we would've signed him, please stop this delusion Scott.
What the fuck is this logicScott_LFC wrote:You didn't reject him because he wouldn't start. You rejected him because you already had too many players in his position. Players that wouldn't be happy on the bench. Wenger is not going to spend £30 million on a luxury.
Do you understand what you just typed?
What's wrong with what he said? Arsenal do have a wealth of talent at that position. Fabregas is better than all of them but still, it doesn't make sense letting them linger while Fabregas eats up playing time. Arsenal has more pressing needs, like striker.Keyser Söze wrote:What the fuck is this logicScott_LFC wrote:You didn't reject him because he wouldn't start. You rejected him because you already had too many players in his position. Players that wouldn't be happy on the bench. Wenger is not going to spend £30 million on a luxury.
menalawyerguy wrote:What's wrong with what he said? Arsenal do have a wealth of talent at that position. Fabregas is better than all of them but still, it doesn't make sense letting them linger while Fabregas eats up playing time. Arsenal has more pressing needs, like striker.Keyser Söze wrote:
What the fuck is this logic
Ramsey is better than him in his role and Fabregas has shown to be just as useless as Ozil is in the big games.
|
|
|
