Lux wrote:Top English strikers:
Rooney - 27
Holt - 15
Graham - 12
Defoe - 11
Sturridge - 11
Crouch - 10
Bent - 9
Welbeck - 9
Inferior league mentions:
Lambert - 27
Hooper - 24
You can only realistically take 4 or maybe 5.
Fuck off, silly mudrat.Willmer wrote:Henrik's Tongue wrote:
That's a great achievement.
Wasn't he only there for like 2 years?
Cadbury wrote:Better than Carroll lololo
No it doesn't.The Zlatan wrote:Just realised that the Scunthorpe badge has a sperm cell on it.
Jelavić7|EFC wrote:Cadbury wrote:Better than Carroll lololo
If that's a sperm cell to you, than you've got serious problems.The Zlatan wrote:
The bit under the writing. Seems pretty conclusive to me.
Trent wrote:If that's a sperm cell to you, than you've got serious problems.The Zlatan wrote:
The bit under the writing. Seems pretty conclusive to me.
This posts makes me remember when we beat Newcastle 2-1 that seasonConorCelticFC wrote:Jelavić7|EFC wrote:
I think Hooper is a far better player than Carroll. Aside from six good months in the premiership what has he done? When Hooper and Carroll were in the Championship in 2009/10 Hooper scored more goals in less games for a relegation-battling team as opposed to champions Newcastle. Even disregarding goals, Hooper is a far less limited player than Carroll who is physically incapable of carrying the ball forward with his feet - one of the most tragic things I've ever seen is Carroll trying to dribble past Savic, of all people, and kicking the ball about 10 metres ahead of him and out of play.
I don't think Carroll has anything special about him. I could never see him having that something extra you need to score a goal like this.
If I remember correctly, Carroll was shocking that game. He also went a loan to Preston a few years prior to that and got sent off against us 
So the two times I have seen Caroll he has been terrible.
Kuled wrote:Sperm cell, wha?
ConorCelticFC wrote:Jelavić7|EFC wrote:
I think Hooper is a far better player than Carroll. Aside from six good months in the premiership what has he done? When Hooper and Carroll were in the Championship in 2009/10 Hooper scored more goals in less games for a relegation-battling team as opposed to champions Newcastle. Even disregarding goals, Hooper is a far less limited player than Carroll who is physically incapable of carrying the ball forward with his feet - one of the most tragic things I've ever seen is Carroll trying to dribble past Savic, of all people, and kicking the ball about 10 metres ahead of him and out of play.
I don't think Carroll has anything special about him. I could never see him having that something extra you need to score a goal like this.
At least I'm not a mud rat, go collect your benefits and be quietWillmer wrote:This Trent kid is a twat
Willmer wrote:ConorCelticFC wrote:
I think Hooper is a far better player than Carroll. Aside from six good months in the premiership what has he done? When Hooper and Carroll were in the Championship in 2009/10 Hooper scored more goals in less games for a relegation-battling team as opposed to champions Newcastle. Even disregarding goals, Hooper is a far less limited player than Carroll who is physically incapable of carrying the ball forward with his feet - one of the most tragic things I've ever seen is Carroll trying to dribble past Savic, of all people, and kicking the ball about 10 metres ahead of him and out of play.
I don't think Carroll has anything special about him. I could never see him having that something extra you need to score a goal like this.
Do you think Hooper could get 15 goals in the Premier League?
I see it nowThe Zlatan wrote:Kuled wrote:Sperm cell, wha?
ConorCelticFC wrote:Willmer wrote:
Do you think Hooper could get 15 goals in the Premier League?
What's so hard to believe about that? Jelavic must have scored nearly that amount in 3 months.
Great spot.The Zlatan wrote:Kuled wrote:Sperm cell, wha?
Jelavić7|EFC wrote:ConorCelticFC wrote:
What's so hard to believe about that? Jelavic must have scored nearly that amount in 3 months.
No offence pal, but I think there's evidently a slight quality difference there.
ConorCelticFC wrote:Jelavić7|EFC wrote:
No offence pal, but I think there's evidently a slight quality difference there.
True, Hooper probably is better than Jelavic but that only strengthens my point.
Jelavić7|EFC wrote:ConorCelticFC wrote:
True, Hooper probably is better than Jelavic but that only strengthens my point.
Oh dear, now who's attention seeking.
Jelavić7|EFC wrote:ConorCelticFC wrote:
True, Hooper probably is better than Jelavic but that only strengthens my point.
Oh dear, now who's attention seeking.
|
|
|
