Danny Murphy - The Best English Midfielder of his Generation

BladeGunner wrote:

kyro7 wrote:

BladeGunner wrote:

Can you prove it? How often do you watch Fulham play with Danny Murphy pulling the strings in midfield? If you often do, you'll have seen how excellent he is at controlling the game despite often being surrounded by players way below his level. His passing statistics speak for themselves. He's up there with the most accurate passers in the league and he's 35. What a fucking player.

You can still be a very good player and be inferior to the best English midfielder of your generation, who is Paul Scholes, I don't need to prove anything, it's my opinion.

No, you can't prove it because you cannot. I am aware that Paul Scholes has developed into the better player, but there is no way of proving that he is more naturally talented than Danny Murphy.

kyro7 wrote:

BladeGunner wrote:


No, you can't prove it because you cannot. I am aware that Paul Scholes has developed into the better player, but there is no way of proving that he is more naturally talented than Danny Murphy.

There is no way of proving Murphy is as naturally talented either, so basically you've made a thread about something neither of us can prove, but have an opinion on, I have given you my opinion and you're asking for proof, you are acting like a clown and I think you should give up on this one.

Jordo wrote:Paul Scholes is in the heart of many Premier League, and Champions League winning teams.

Danny Murphy is in the heart of teams at Europa League standard, at best.

BladeGunner wrote:

kyro7 wrote:

BladeGunner wrote:


No, you can't prove it because you cannot. I am aware that Paul Scholes has developed into the better player, but there is no way of proving that he is more naturally talented than Danny Murphy.

There is no way of proving Murphy is as naturally talented either, so basically you've made a thread about something neither of us can prove, but have an opinion on, I have given you my opinion and you're asking for proof, you are acting like a clown and I think you should give up on this one.

No, there is plenty of evidence. Passing ability isn't something you acquire through training, it's a natural gift. The same with vision and ball control. Danny Murphy has these things in abundance. Not only would you easily be able to deduce that by watching a couple of Fulham games, you can gather that from the statistics (even though I don't like referring to them). They really do put him up there with the likes of Silva, Touré, Song, Arteta and Modric. There's plenty to support my case.

BladeGunner wrote:

Jordo wrote:Paul Scholes is in the heart of many Premier League, and Champions League winning teams.

Danny Murphy is in the heart of teams at Europa League standard, at best.

Idiot, completely missing the point.

kyro7 wrote:

BladeGunner wrote:

No, there is plenty of evidence. Passing ability isn't something you acquire through training, it's a natural gift. The same with vision and ball control. Danny Murphy has these things in abundance. Not only would you easily be able to deduce that by watching a couple of Fulham games, you can gather that from the statistics (even though I don't like referring to them). They really do put him up there with the likes of Silva, Touré, Song, Arteta and Modric. There's plenty to support my case.

Oh, strong proof of him being as naturally gifted then, well done.

Jordo wrote:

BladeGunner wrote:

Idiot, completely missing the point.

Fuck off, you massive WUM.

BladeGunner wrote:

kyro7 wrote:

BladeGunner wrote:

No, there is plenty of evidence. Passing ability isn't something you acquire through training, it's a natural gift. The same with vision and ball control. Danny Murphy has these things in abundance. Not only would you easily be able to deduce that by watching a couple of Fulham games, you can gather that from the statistics (even though I don't like referring to them). They really do put him up there with the likes of Silva, Touré, Song, Arteta and Modric. There's plenty to support my case.

Oh, strong proof of him being as naturally gifted then, well done.

Yes, it is.

Oh, strong counter-argument to refute my points then, well done.

BladeGunner wrote:

Jordo wrote:

Fuck off, you massive WUM.

Useless cunt, just like the majority of this forum. Barely any of you can argue to save your lives. All you do is post incoherent horseshit that is often accompanied by inane smileys.

Jordo wrote:

BladeGunner wrote:

Useless cunt, just like the majority of this forum. Barely any of you can argue to save your lives. All you do is post incoherent horseshit that is often accompanied by inane smileys.

Danny wrote:Only English midfielder of his generation who can control a game.

Somewhere in Cheshire Paul Scholes is crying.

kyro7 wrote:

BladeGunner wrote:

Yes, it is.

Oh, strong counter-argument to refute my points then, well done.

No, you're being an idiot, you made a thread saying he's the best English player of his generation, we then all came to the agreement that he is in fact not, then you drop to him being as naturally gifted, which no stat can prove, but only an opinion can be formed after watching them and seeing how they work, for me Scholes is far and away the better player, the way he has transformed his game over his career is unbelievable, and the fact he's been doing this all at the TOP level for so long is unbelievable, but none of this can prove he is more naturally gifted, not his passing percentages, not how he's gone on to be one of the most successful English players, none of it.. so what's the point of me trying to prove something that isn't possible of being proven, because your attempt at proving Murphy to be as naturally gifted was laughable and proved absolutely nothing, I'm happy for you to believe whatever you want but I've given you my opinion and that's all I can do on something like this.

BladeGunner wrote:If you're so protective of your right to express your views, then why have you incessantly attempted to try and ridicule my own. You're right, it's not exactly black and white and it might be impossible to prove it. However, I've argued my case, backed it with evidence and almost all I've received are stupid smileys and petty insults.

Jordo wrote:

BladeGunner wrote:

Useless cunt, just like the majority of this forum. Barely any of you can argue to save your lives. All you do is post incoherent horseshit that is often accompanied by inane smileys.

Sarmz wrote:I've missed Blade's debating skills, just swear and call people cockroaches until they agree with you

mauro=beast wrote:you must be new here

these type of threads are so 2010

go neck yourself blade gunner noob

Van Wolfswinkel wrote:

Jordo wrote:

But yeah, could do better than Fulham, but not title contender standards. Top 6 team standard.

Van Wolfswinkel wrote:

Jordo wrote:

But yeah, could do better than Fulham, but not title contender standards. Top 6 team standard.

BladeGunner wrote:

Sarmz wrote:I've missed Blade's debating skills, just swear and call people cockroaches until they agree with you

Yeah, what are your debating skills like? Repeatedly posting paedophilic images until the opponent submits?

kyro7 wrote:

BladeGunner wrote:If you're so protective of your right to express your views, then why have you incessantly attempted to try and ridicule my own. You're right, it's not exactly black and white and it might be impossible to prove it. However, I've argued my case, backed it with evidence and almost all I've received are stupid smileys and petty insults.

Can you show me where I've mocked your opinion here? I gave you some shit at first because what you said was completely misleading as it looked like you were trolling to the maximum, after it was clarified all I did was give you my opinion..

Sarmz wrote:

BladeGunner wrote:

Yeah, what are your debating skills like? Repeatedly posting paedophilic images until the opponent submits?

I was not aware being attracted to a 19 year old made me a paedophile