Liverpool FC Official Thread

All of you fuck off and get out

Cam wrote:All of you fuck off and get out

Lus Suarez wrote:

LiamB_14 wrote:Suarez tried to claim that he pinched Evra in an attempt to try and defuse and calm the situation

No wonder they found him guilty, lies and inconsistencies are found right throughout the Liverpool FC case. This is absolutely shameful that a brand such as Liverpool FC can lie in this way, seems the commission saw straight through them

*sigh* I can see why the Liverpool fans are always upset about Mancs coming in their threads.

Because I don't try an claim that Suarez is innocent, the commission and the FA are in Fergies pocket?

My friend, this is a professional organisation with numerous experienced members at dealing with this type of case. They have spent 3 months of deliberation and analysis into this case, and not simply given it a seconds thought like the majority of Liverpool fans on this forum. They also have unbroadcasted video evidence from numerous different angles that the public have not seen.

I would believe that what I am posting is almost guaranteed to be correct, please stop jumping in with the Liverpool fans, the reality is they don't have a clue what happened.

RR has realised that he can't really prove that post wrong, so he decided to try and make a big deal out of a joke that Alan made in hope that people would ignore the post from Dan.

Jay wrote:RR has realised that he can't really prove that post wrong, so he decided to try and make a big deal out of a joke that Alan made in hope that people would ignore the post from Dan.

He did the same thing with Lux earlier.

Danny wrote:

Lus Suarez wrote:WHICH STILL MEANS FUCK ALL.

Yes it does. Liverpool aren't our rivals in the title race, so having him banned doesn't benefit us.

The title race is a fictitious race you dumbfuck. Liverpool are still in the competition until they cannot mathematically win.

And this means a weaker Liverpool will be playing other clubs that may be in the title race with Liverpool anyway.

Jay wrote:RR has realised that he can't really prove that post wrong, so he decided to try and make a big deal out of a joke that Alan made in hope that people would ignore the post from Dan.

It's not worth responding to, it's patently obvious what happened, the FA saw different angles of the incident, or they interpreted them differently. It's not relevant.

So it's not relevant when it's evidence in favor of Suarez/Liverpool?

Lus Suarez wrote:

Jay wrote:RR has realised that he can't really prove that post wrong, so he decided to try and make a big deal out of a joke that Alan made in hope that people would ignore the post from Dan.

He did the same thing with Lux earlier.

Danny wrote:Yes it does. Liverpool aren't our rivals in the title race, so having him banned doesn't benefit us.

The title race is a fictitious race you dumbfuck. Liverpool are still in the competition until they cannot mathematically win.

And this means a weaker Liverpool will be playing other clubs that may be in the title race with Liverpool anyway.

Let's be honest, with or without Suarez, they're not gonna fucking win it, anyone can see that.

I'm done with this.

I stand by my observation that Polska is the LiamB of Suarez.

Danny wrote:

Lus Suarez wrote:He did the same thing with Lux earlier.

The title race is a fictitious race you dumbfuck. Liverpool are still in the competition until they cannot mathematically win.

And this means a weaker Liverpool will be playing other clubs that may be in the title race with Liverpool anyway.

Let's be honest, with or without Suarez, they're not gonna fucking win it, anyone can see that.

I'm done with this.

That's not the fucking point. They are still mathematically in the competition for 1st.

Good, you are a fucking retard.

Lus Suarez wrote:

Danny wrote:Let's be honest, with or without Suarez, they're not gonna fucking win it, anyone can see that.

I'm done with this.

That's not the fucking point. They are still mathematically in the competition for 1st.

Good, you are a fucking retard.

I'm the retard?

COYS wrote:I stand by my observation that Polska is the LiamB of Suarez.

No, no he's not. Not even close.

Cam wrote:

COYS wrote:I stand by my observation that Polska is the LiamB of Suarez.

No, no he's not. Not even close.

Yes he is.

Polska, having Suarez banned doesn't benefit Man Utd more than it would benefit Arsenal or Newcastle or Chelsea.

Lus Suarez wrote:So it's not relevant when it's evidence in favor of Suarez/Liverpool?

How does it favour them? How does the intent of a foul relate to whether he racially abused Evra? How does Kuyt speaking to or not speaking to Evra favour Liverpool?

Actually scrap that, Liam's never gone as far as to change him name to 'Berbatov'

COYS wrote:

Cam wrote:

No, no he's not. Not even close.

Yes he is.

Not by a mile.

Danny wrote:

Lus Suarez wrote:That's not the fucking point. They are still mathematically in the competition for 1st.

Good, you are a fucking retard.

I'm the retard?

Good. You have reading comprehension. I promote you from retard to imbecile.

COYS wrote:

Cam wrote:

No, no he's not. Not even close.

Yes he is.

No, Polska posts about other things, I've never seen Liam post about anything other than Berbatov.

COYS wrote:I stand by my observation that Polska is the LiamB of Suarez.

I have formed my observation that your observations stink of shit.

Err, can anyone tell me how United's interests of seeing Luis Suarez banned is relevant to the evidence that I posted?

Cam wrote:

COYS wrote:

Yes he is.

No, Polska posts about other things, I've never seen Liam post about anything other than Berbatov.

When it comes to talking about Suarez though, Polska brings some wonderful stuff to the table.

Is this the same COYS from EA?

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

Jay wrote:RR has realised that he can't really prove that post wrong, so he decided to try and make a big deal out of a joke that Alan made in hope that people would ignore the post from Dan.

It's not worth responding to, it's patently obvious what happened, the FA saw different angles of the incident, or they interpreted them differently. It's not relevant.

So the FA are blatant liars, I mean ive already said that if Saurez did say what it says he did he deserves to be banned and needs to sort himself fucking out. But please ive saw the Suarez and Evra challenge i did not see a kick, If im proved otherwise fair enough.

And on another note, that Cheese cake i just had was fucking amazing.

Cam wrote:

COYS wrote:

Yes he is.

No, Polska posts about other things, I've never seen Liam post about anything other than Berbatov.

My friend, I am talking about Liverpool FC and Luis Suarez. Dimitar Berbatov was not a member of this case, he maintained his distance and kept his dignity and honour firmly intact. You cannot put a blemish on the name of Dimitar Berbatov

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

Lus Suarez wrote:So it's not relevant when it's evidence in favor of Suarez/Liverpool?

How does it favour them? How does the intent of a foul relate to whether he racially abused Evra? How does Kuyt speaking to or not speaking to Evra favour Liverpool?

It's the precursor to the event where the racial abuse may or may not have transpired. The commission seems to value this event alot in their report anyway.

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

Jay wrote:RR has realised that he can't really prove that post wrong, so he decided to try and make a big deal out of a joke that Alan made in hope that people would ignore the post from Dan.

It's not worth responding to, it's patently obvious what happened, the FA saw different angles of the incident, or they interpreted them differently. It's not relevant.

I would bet my life that you wouldn't be ignoring it if it was new evidence supporting Evra after Suarez had been found innocent.

Dan wrote:Is this the same COYS from EA?

No, this is Point who changed his name to COYS.

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

Jay wrote:RR has realised that he can't really prove that post wrong, so he decided to try and make a big deal out of a joke that Alan made in hope that people would ignore the post from Dan.

It's not worth responding to, it's patently obvious what happened, the FA saw different angles of the incident, or they interpreted them differently. It's not relevant.

I wonder which angle they used to come to the assumption that Kuyt didn't say anything to Evra..

SBSP wrote:

Dan wrote:Is this the same COYS from EA?

No, this is Point who changed his name to COYS.

It does say so under my name

I changed my name because it's 'Come On You Spurs' rather then mimicking COYS from the old forum (who I'd forgotten about at 1st when I asked)

Wish COYS was on here Missed his football knowledge.