COYS wrote:Cam wrote:
No, no he's not. Not even close.
Yes he is.
He really isn't .
COYS wrote:Cam wrote:
No, no he's not. Not even close.
Yes he is.
COYS wrote:Cam wrote:
No, no he's not. Not even close.
Yes he is.
Are you five?COYS wrote:Oh yes he is.
Alright, lets say that they were wrong when it came to that incident - how does that change anything?Lus Suarez wrote:It's the precursor to the event where the racial abuse may or may not have transpired. The commission seems to value this event alot in their report anyway.ResurrectionRooney wrote:How does it favour them? How does the intent of a foul relate to whether he racially abused Evra? How does Kuyt speaking to or not speaking to Evra favour Liverpool?
What are you talking about? It doesn't support either of them. None of you would be supporting Suarez is he didn't play for you.Jay wrote:I would bet my life that you wouldn't be ignoring it if it was new evidence supporting Evra after Suarez had been found innocent.ResurrectionRooney wrote:It's not worth responding to, it's patently obvious what happened, the FA saw different angles of the incident, or they interpreted them differently. It's not relevant.
I don't know, is there an angle which conclusively shows he does say something? Because all I can see is him bending over, I can't see his lips move or hear him saying anything.Dan wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:It's not worth responding to, it's patently obvious what happened, the FA saw different angles of the incident, or they interpreted them differently. It's not relevant.
I wonder which angle they used to come to the assumption that Kuyt didn't say anything to Evra..
SBSP wrote:Are you five?COYS wrote:Oh yes he is.
SBSP wrote:Are you five?COYS wrote:Oh yes he is.
Dan wrote:SBSP wrote:Are you five?
No, he's 21. It says under his name.
Dan wrote:I've tried to keep up with this thread, but every hour another 7000 pages are added! So my apologies if this has already been shown.
Credit to RedLFCBlood over on LFCREDS, here is video of Evra going down after contact with Suarez. Before you watch it, here are the FA's words:
In the 58th minute of the game, Mr Suarez fouled Mr Evra between the edge of the Manchester United penalty area and the corner flag at the Kop end. It seemed to us to be a deliberate foul, and the referee awarded a free kick. The foul was committed by Mr Suarez kicking Mr Evra on his right knee. Mr Evra explained that he had previously had a bad problem in that knee. He remained on the ground receiving medical treatment for about one minute after the tackle.
2nd point: Mr Evra said that while he was lying on the ground, Mr Kuyt came up to him and said "stand up, you fucking prick". Mr Kuyt said "This is untrue. What I did say was something to the effect of "Stand up, stand up", as if to say that it had been a foul but he was making too much of it". The video footage did not show Mr Kuyt speaking to Mr Evra at this time, but Mr Kuyt admitted that he did so.
Now watch the video starting at about 1:15. Suarez did not kick Evra deliberately, and Kuyt did say something to Evra. Both points are obvious on the video to even the most biased United apologist, yet the FA gets both points horrendously wrong. They had zero desire to get the facts right. They put their blinders on and set out to find whatever they could to convict Suarez, discounting any evidence that didn't fit their wishes.
It's a fucking witch hunt!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=LH50lwwBRms
I shall post it again as certain members have chosen to ignore it.
LiamB_14 wrote:Dan wrote:I've tried to keep up with this thread, but every hour another 7000 pages are added! So my apologies if this has already been shown.
Credit to RedLFCBlood over on LFCREDS, here is video of Evra going down after contact with Suarez. Before you watch it, here are the FA's words:
In the 58th minute of the game, Mr Suarez fouled Mr Evra between the edge of the Manchester United penalty area and the corner flag at the Kop end. It seemed to us to be a deliberate foul, and the referee awarded a free kick. The foul was committed by Mr Suarez kicking Mr Evra on his right knee. Mr Evra explained that he had previously had a bad problem in that knee. He remained on the ground receiving medical treatment for about one minute after the tackle.
2nd point: Mr Evra said that while he was lying on the ground, Mr Kuyt came up to him and said "stand up, you fucking prick". Mr Kuyt said "This is untrue. What I did say was something to the effect of "Stand up, stand up", as if to say that it had been a foul but he was making too much of it". The video footage did not show Mr Kuyt speaking to Mr Evra at this time, but Mr Kuyt admitted that he did so.
Now watch the video starting at about 1:15. Suarez did not kick Evra deliberately, and Kuyt did say something to Evra. Both points are obvious on the video to even the most biased United apologist, yet the FA gets both points horrendously wrong. They had zero desire to get the facts right. They put their blinders on and set out to find whatever they could to convict Suarez, discounting any evidence that didn't fit their wishes.
It's a fucking witch hunt!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=LH50lwwBRms
I shall post it again as certain members have chosen to ignore it.
That is a terrible angle to view ehether or not the incident was done on purpose or not considering Evra is blocking the view of Suarez's leg. I would much prefer the FA's analysis from the numerous angles they had available to them in viewing these incidents. They also say "It seemed to be deliberate" that is not them saying that it was deliberate my friend.
The FA have far superior angles, image quality and time to review this incident. In all probability, they are the ones we should entrust over an amateur video from a poor angle and poor quality.
COYS wrote:SBSP wrote:Are you five?
No just high as a kite right now.
I'll stop being annoying in like an hour or so
I do stick by the fact he's just another LiamB though. If he only come on here when Suarez was made everyone would be saying the same.
Jesus Christ, that would be like Barcelona/Madrid trying to get a Levante player suspended in this situation.Lus Suarez wrote:That's not the fucking point. They are still mathematically in the competition for 1st.Danny wrote:Let's be honest, with or without Suarez, they're not gonna fucking win it, anyone can see that.
I'm done with this.
Good, you are a fucking retard.
Why compare him to a pass master who sits deeper whereas Gerrards gets forward a lot more so it bound to have better stats?JonjoShelvey wrote:Gerrard: 556 games 142 goals, 83 assists.
Xavi: 557 games 63 goals, 67 assists.
Decent fact about Stevie.
I shall try and find it.ResurrectionRooney wrote:I would love to see how many passes and successful passes each man has made in that period.
I don't know, I just thought it was interesting.kyro7 wrote:Why compare him to a pass master who sits deeper whereas Gerrards gets forward a lot more so it bound to have better stats?JonjoShelvey wrote:Gerrard: 556 games 142 goals, 83 assists.
Xavi: 557 games 63 goals, 67 assists.
Decent fact about Stevie.
I don't remember the last time I saw Arsenal written as "ASNL"Theo Filippo wrote:Heres one successful pass:
No.Mason_Inzaghi wrote:Is RonaldDonald33 RR?
ResurrectionRooney wrote:No.Mason_Inzaghi wrote:Is RonaldDonald33 RR?