ResurrectionRooney wrote:Everything about Liverpool FC sticking behind Suarez no matter what, I think that helps foster an atmosphere of tribalism, us against them.
Jordo wrote:Mid January is when the FA are going to release the documents of this case.
They should have released them with the verdict.
Laurencio wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:Everything about Liverpool FC sticking behind Suarez no matter what, I think that helps foster an atmosphere of tribalism, us against them.
Dalglish is loyal to a fault though. If one of his players had been accused of murder, and gave him his word he didn't do it, he'd be behind the player even if the proessecution had his prints on the murder weapon.
Laurencio wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:Everything about Liverpool FC sticking behind Suarez no matter what, I think that helps foster an atmosphere of tribalism, us against them.
Dalglish is loyal to a fault though. If one of his players had been accused of murder, and gave him his word he didn't do it, he'd be behind the player even if the proessecution had his prints on the murder weapon.
ResurrectionRooney wrote:Laurencio wrote:
Dalglish is loyal to a fault though. If one of his players had been accused of murder, and gave him his word he didn't do it, he'd be behind the player even if the proessecution had his prints on the murder weapon.
I don't think so, that type of loyalty could almost be construed as admirable, it's worse than that. He is only loyal to people who he needs, there was no loyalty when it came to Charles Itandje, no understanding there, but because Suarez is Liverpool's most effective player, Dalglish will do everything in his power to protect him, and it'll make him be seen as a success.
Laurencio wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:Everything about Liverpool FC sticking behind Suarez no matter what, I think that helps foster an atmosphere of tribalism, us against them.
Dalglish is loyal to a fault though. If one of his players had been accused of murder, and gave him his word he didn't do it, he'd be behind the player even if the proessecution had his prints on the murder weapon.
Dan wrote:Laurencio wrote:
Dalglish is loyal to a fault though. If one of his players had been accused of murder, and gave him his word he didn't do it, he'd be behind the player even if the proessecution had his prints on the murder weapon.
Oh dear..
Scott wrote:He clearly wasn't joking. What we are witnessing is the forum-famous backtracking.
ResurrectionRooney wrote:Dalglish has worn a t-shirt with the face of a guy who was proven to have made racially abusive comment on it, and with his name on the back. He will do absolutely everything to defend his own interests, which include Liverpool's best players being available to him, regardless of whether he dresses it up as Liverpool being this great club who show loyalty to their players. It doesn't matter if they piss on the 'Let's Kick Racism out of Football' campaign that Liverpool have signed up to, what matters is that Kenneth Dalglish can have the best players available to him. If he was shite, if he was an Itandje, Dalglish wouldn't be defending him.
Liverpool do tend to stick up for their own though, they campaigned for a guy found guilty of attempted 3 times to be freed from jail purely because he's a Liverpool supporter.
Scott wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:Dalglish has worn a t-shirt with the face of a guy who was proven to have made racially abusive comment on it, and with his name on the back. He will do absolutely everything to defend his own interests, which include Liverpool's best players being available to him, regardless of whether he dresses it up as Liverpool being this great club who show loyalty to their players. It doesn't matter if they piss on the 'Let's Kick Racism out of Football' campaign that Liverpool have signed up to, what matters is that Kenneth Dalglish can have the best players available to him. If he was shite, if he was an Itandje, Dalglish wouldn't be defending him.
Liverpool do tend to stick up for their own though, they campaigned for a guy found guilty of attempted 3 times to be freed from jail purely because he's a Liverpool supporter.
Suarez didn't make a racially abusive comment.
He made a friendly comment, which Evra took as racist because he's a little whiney bitch.
ResurrectionRooney wrote:Scott wrote:
Suarez didn't make a racially abusive comment.
He made a friendly comment, which Evra took as racist because he's a little whiney bitch.
Why did the independent commission find that he made a racially abusive comment then?
ResurrectionRooney wrote:Scott wrote:
Suarez didn't make a racially abusive comment.
He made a friendly comment, which Evra took as racist because he's a little whiney bitch.
Why did the independent commission find that he made a racially abusive comment then?
Jordo wrote:Glen Johnson @glen_johnson 1m Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
I will support who i want when i want!!! There are a lot of reasons why I'm standing by Luis Suarez!!!
Was pretty thick of Liverpool to approve a panel of morons, wasn't it? How do you qualify to be a QC if you're stupid anyway?Scott wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:
Why did the independent commission find that he made a racially abusive comment then?
Because they're stupid and I fully expect it to be reversed.
Scott wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:Dalglish has worn a t-shirt with the face of a guy who was proven to have made racially abusive comment on it, and with his name on the back. He will do absolutely everything to defend his own interests, which include Liverpool's best players being available to him, regardless of whether he dresses it up as Liverpool being this great club who show loyalty to their players. It doesn't matter if they piss on the 'Let's Kick Racism out of Football' campaign that Liverpool have signed up to, what matters is that Kenneth Dalglish can have the best players available to him. If he was shite, if he was an Itandje, Dalglish wouldn't be defending him.
Liverpool do tend to stick up for their own though, they campaigned for a guy found guilty of attempted 3 times to be freed from jail purely because he's a Liverpool supporter.
Suarez didn't make a racially abusive comment.
He made a friendly comment, which Evra took as racist because he's a little whiney bitch.
Scott wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:
Why did the independent commission find that he made a racially abusive comment then?
Because they're stupid and I fully expect it to be reversed.
Dan wrote:Because they are xenophobic.
Scott wrote:Jordo wrote:Glen Johnson @glen_johnson 1m Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
I will support who i want when i want!!! There are a lot of reasons why I'm standing by Luis Suarez!!!
Really doubt Johnson would say something like this if he believed Suarez to be racist.
Scott wrote:Jordo wrote:Glen Johnson @glen_johnson 1m Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
I will support who i want when i want!!! There are a lot of reasons why I'm standing by Luis Suarez!!!
Really doubt Johnson would say something like this if he believed Suarez to be racist.
Scott wrote:Jordo wrote:Glen Johnson @glen_johnson 1m Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
I will support who i want when i want!!! There are a lot of reasons why I'm standing by Luis Suarez!!!
Really doubt Johnson would say something like this if he believed Suarez to be racist.
ResurrectionRooney wrote:Scott wrote:
Really doubt Johnson would say something like this if he believed Suarez to be racist.
He hasn't been banned for being a racist, he's been banned for using racial abuse.
Scott wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:
He hasn't been banned for being a racist, he's been banned for using racial abuse.
Let me rephrase then.
Really doubt Johnson would say something like this if he believed Suarez to have racially abused Evra.
Lux wrote:You can't racially abuse someone if you're not racist.
ResurrectionRooney wrote:Lux wrote:You can't racially abuse someone if you're not racist.
Of course you can, racism is a belief in the inequality of races, a racial slur is a means to wind someone up.
