Chelsea v West Brom Match Thread, 20/8/11 17:15 ESPN

Jamie wrote:Why does Anelka hold on to the ball about 10 minutes longer than he needs to every time?

Jamie wrote:Why does Anelka hold on to the ball about 10 minutes longer than he needs to every time?

Marvin wrote:Because incase you haven't noticed Jamie, no one apart from Torres makes any good runs. Movement is so shit upfront.

JMB_94 wrote:What does AvB stand for?

JMB_94 wrote:What does AvB stand for?

Jamie wrote:

Marvin wrote:Because incase you haven't noticed Jamie, no one apart from Torres makes any good runs. Movement is so shit upfront.

He slows the play down too much.

Marvin wrote:Josh and Yossi surely can't do any worse, wack them on.

Jamie wrote:

Marvin wrote:Because incase you haven't noticed Jamie, no one apart from Torres makes any good runs. Movement is so shit upfront.

He slows the play down too much.

Would rather he did then play a mindless pass upfront i.e. Charlie Adam.

mauro=beast wrote:i do not think anelka is bad when he slow play down. he has composure with ball unlike those other players who shit their pants when they get the ball. sometimes slowing play down is good, i read a nice article last season about real madrid, when ronaldo didnt play, real madrid played much much faster pace but their incisiveness in final third was not as clinical in terms of connecting each pass. but when ronaldo does play, the team plays better as result but the tempo is fairly slower

i know anelka is not ronaldo at all but he has similar efffect to chelsea. whenever anelka not playing chelsea just makes longballs....his presence demands ball to feet

mauro=beast wrote:i do not think anelka is bad when he slow play down. he has composure with ball unlike those other players who shit their pants when they get the ball. sometimes slowing play down is good, i read a nice article last season about real madrid, when ronaldo didnt play, real madrid played much much faster pace but their incisiveness in final third was not as clinical in terms of connecting each pass. but when ronaldo does play, the team plays better as result but the tempo is fairly slower

i know anelka is not ronaldo at all but he has similar efffect to chelsea. whenever anelka not playing chelsea just makes longballs....his presence demands ball to feet

mauro=beast wrote:i do not think anelka is bad when he slow play down. he has composure with ball unlike those other players who shit their pants when they get the ball. sometimes slowing play down is good, i read a nice article last season about real madrid, when ronaldo didnt play, real madrid played much much faster pace but their incisiveness in final third was not as clinical in terms of connecting each pass. but when ronaldo does play, the team plays better as result but the tempo is fairly slower

i know anelka is not ronaldo at all but he has similar efffect to chelsea. whenever anelka not playing chelsea just makes longballs....his presence demands ball to feet

RobbieSavageIsA... wrote:

mauro=beast wrote:i do not think anelka is bad when he slow play down. he has composure with ball unlike those other players who shit their pants when they get the ball. sometimes slowing play down is good, i read a nice article last season about real madrid, when ronaldo didnt play, real madrid played much much faster pace but their incisiveness in final third was not as clinical in terms of connecting each pass. but when ronaldo does play, the team plays better as result but the tempo is fairly slower

i know anelka is not ronaldo at all but he has similar efffect to chelsea. whenever anelka not playing chelsea just makes longballs....his presence demands ball to feet

Has anyone ever taught you how to form a sentence?

mauro=beast wrote:

RobbieSavageIsA... wrote:

mauro=beast wrote:i do not think anelka is bad when he slow play down. he has composure with ball unlike those other players who shit their pants when they get the ball. sometimes slowing play down is good, i read a nice article last season about real madrid, when ronaldo didnt play, real madrid played much much faster pace but their incisiveness in final third was not as clinical in terms of connecting each pass. but when ronaldo does play, the team plays better as result but the tempo is fairly slower

i know anelka is not ronaldo at all but he has similar efffect to chelsea. whenever anelka not playing chelsea just makes longballs....his presence demands ball to feet

Has anyone ever taught you how to form a sentence?

for sure, but its an ongoing process

you have other priorities than worrying about that though, like making me dinner woman. get back in that kitchen

mauro=beast wrote:

RobbieSavageIsA... wrote:

mauro=beast wrote:i do not think anelka is bad when he slow play down. he has composure with ball unlike those other players who shit their pants when they get the ball. sometimes slowing play down is good, i read a nice article last season about real madrid, when ronaldo didnt play, real madrid played much much faster pace but their incisiveness in final third was not as clinical in terms of connecting each pass. but when ronaldo does play, the team plays better as result but the tempo is fairly slower

i know anelka is not ronaldo at all but he has similar efffect to chelsea. whenever anelka not playing chelsea just makes longballs....his presence demands ball to feet

Has anyone ever taught you how to form a sentence?

for sure, but its an ongoing process

you have other priorities than worrying about that though, like making me dinner woman. get back in that kitchen