crump wrote:James wrote:I hear lots of stuff but i'm not stupid enough to believe it all.
The sooner you're banned the better, shouldn't be long tbh.
Amazing.
crump wrote:James wrote:I hear lots of stuff but i'm not stupid enough to believe it all.
The sooner you're banned the better, shouldn't be long tbh.
Im sorry you feel i am a cunt.SBSP wrote:TBF, crump is harmless. James is just a cunt. It's like comparing fluffy to Filippo.Sean wrote:At least James is entertaining, Crump is the forum equivalent of a dry sponge
BMxJoga wrote:Soooooo John Terry: overrated?
Forest wrote:Pique isn't the best. Rio and Vidic are both better.
ResurrectionRooney wrote:Surprised no-one's mentioned Ferdinand yet, he's a better player than Vidic in my view.
Well I think Dawson will soon pass him and be Englands best defender. I always felt Terry relied more on Carvahlo for his success.Sean wrote:BMxJoga wrote:Soooooo John Terry: overrated?
Depends how highly you rate him, he's still England's best CB, he's still one of the best 10-15 CB's in the world for me.
ResurrectionRooney wrote:Surprised no-one's mentioned Ferdinand yet, he's a better player than Vidic in my view.
crump wrote:What about Puyol? This season has been quite injury-ridden one, but on his day, definitely the best?
BMxJoga wrote:Well I think Dawson will soon pass him and be Englands best defender. I always felt Terry relied more on Carvahlo for his success.Sean wrote:BMxJoga wrote:Soooooo John Terry: overrated?
Depends how highly you rate him, he's still England's best CB, he's still one of the best 10-15 CB's in the world for me.
Ah yes, I was looking through the thread for the name Ferdinand, rather than Rio.SBSP wrote:He has been mentioned.Forest wrote:Pique isn't the best. Rio and Vidic are both better.
Sort of.
The injuries have hit him, but it's the same as van Persie, he'll miss a lot of games but when he is fit he is exceptional.Sean wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:Surprised no-one's mentioned Ferdinand yet, he's a better player than Vidic in my view.
Maybe its the injuries and Rio disappearing from view a bit, but I cant agree with that
That's interesting, most MU fans or afficionados always seem to have Vidic higher. Rio I guess is a but more technical, but he's been injured more often then not lately so it is kind of hard to take him into account.ResurrectionRooney wrote:Surprised no-one's mentioned Ferdinand yet, he's a better player than Vidic in my view.
Fine Shagger wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:Surprised no-one's mentioned Ferdinand yet, he's a better player than Vidic in my view.
He is better at his peak for me too, not convinced by his injury problems though.
ResurrectionRooney wrote:Do people here really think Terry is England's best centre back? Honestly, I can't understand that, you might as well be watching a different sport to me.Fine Shagger wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:Surprised no-one's mentioned Ferdinand yet, he's a better player than Vidic in my view.
He is better at his peak for me too, not convinced by his injury problems though.
Yeah, taking the injuries into account, Vidic is obviously more important to the club, fit Ferdinand Vs. fit Vidic though, it's Ferdinand every time for me.
Sean wrote:BMxJoga wrote:Well I think Dawson will soon pass him and be Englands best defender. I always felt Terry relied more on Carvahlo for his success.Sean wrote:BMxJoga wrote:Soooooo John Terry: overrated?
Depends how highly you rate him, he's still England's best CB, he's still one of the best 10-15 CB's in the world for me.
Cant see it, Smalling or Jones will probably replace Terry in a few years
BMxJoga wrote:That's interesting, most MU fans or afficionados always seem to have Vidic higher. Rio I guess is a but more technical, but he's been injured more often then not lately so it is kind of hard to take him into account.ResurrectionRooney wrote:Surprised no-one's mentioned Ferdinand yet, he's a better player than Vidic in my view.
Fine Shagger wrote:Ferdinand back in like...2007/2008(I'm guessing here) was one of the best displays over a season I've seen. Vidic won't ever match it.
Sean wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:Do people here really think Terry is England's best centre back? Honestly, I can't understand that, you might as well be watching a different sport to me.Fine Shagger wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:Surprised no-one's mentioned Ferdinand yet, he's a better player than Vidic in my view.
He is better at his peak for me too, not convinced by his injury problems though.
Yeah, taking the injuries into account, Vidic is obviously more important to the club, fit Ferdinand Vs. fit Vidic though, it's Ferdinand every time for me.
Not ever but at the moment yes
ResurrectionRooney wrote:Sean wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:Do people here really think Terry is England's best centre back? Honestly, I can't understand that, you might as well be watching a different sport to me.Fine Shagger wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:Surprised no-one's mentioned Ferdinand yet, he's a better player than Vidic in my view.
He is better at his peak for me too, not convinced by his injury problems though.
Yeah, taking the injuries into account, Vidic is obviously more important to the club, fit Ferdinand Vs. fit Vidic though, it's Ferdinand every time for me.
Not ever but at the moment yes
In what respect is he better than Ferdinand?
BMxJoga wrote:RR that's what I have been saying this whole thread. That's why I rate Thiago Silva so highly. Tbf though I would go as far to call VIdic's style brutish, his positioning is excellent and he's a threat on any set piece.