[65%] [35%] 
Danny wrote:We do yeah, look at our thread, RR can't stop going on about Carrick, Sneidjer and Nasri, but saying shit like Carrick can't pass...El_indian wrote:so you don't feel the need to improve that midfield?
Bet you anything Carrick's pass percentage is better than Adam's. It wouldn't be hard to beat.
Neither do I. I just think saying stuff like Carrick can't pass the ball is just stupid.El_indian wrote:Danny wrote:We do yeah, look at our thread, RR can't stop going on about Carrick, Sneidjer and Nasri, but saying shit like Carrick can't pass...El_indian wrote:so you don't feel the need to improve that midfield?
Bet you anything Carrick's pass percentage is better than Adam's. It wouldn't be hard to beat.
I'll leave you to find the stats as I don't give a shit either way..
Don't think I expected anything else though. 
Danny wrote:Neither do I. I just think saying stuff like Carrick can't pass the ball is just stupid.El_indian wrote:Danny wrote:We do yeah, look at our thread, RR can't stop going on about Carrick, Sneidjer and Nasri, but saying shit like Carrick can't pass...El_indian wrote:so you don't feel the need to improve that midfield?
Bet you anything Carrick's pass percentage is better than Adam's. It wouldn't be hard to beat.
I'll leave you to find the stats as I don't give a shit either way..
Yes, but my improvements allow a position for Carrick. He was extremely efficient 2006-09 for us.El_indian wrote:so you don't feel the need to improve that midfield?
Midfield is the weakest area of our team, for sure, but to say Carrick is the worst midfielder that you've ever seen, or to imagine you could get away with playing such a shit player and still win nearly everything over a 5 year period is preposterous.Scouser_Dave wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:Scouser_Dave wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:Scouser_Dave wrote:Carrick winning the poll
It's a mystery to you because you're pretty thick and don't really understand football. Nearly all midfielders in the Premier League are worse than Carrick, and he would walk into your team. Ferguson keeps picking him, I think he knows a bit more about football than you do.
Would he fuck
Ferguson keeps picking him because your midfield is a fucking shambles. Probably think's he will spring into this world class midfielder under his guidance. You would have thought the penny would have dropped for the old fart by now.
That explains why we've been so unsuccessful over the past 5 years, we've been carrying a passenger in Carrick. God, I hope the penny drops soon.
Every great team has some flaw and your's is the midfielder.
Kuled wrote:So if Carrick is the worst midfielder you've ever seen...that means that you think Poulsen is better?
El_indian wrote:Kuled wrote:So if Carrick is the worst midfielder you've ever seen...that means that you think Poulsen is better?
his statement is not intended in that way, you're misinterpreting it.
He has to be the worst midfielder I've seen playing football.
LiamB_14 wrote:Quite clearly the answer is Michael Carrick for ovious reasons
It is like Paul Scholes was saying the other day. Certain individuals are greedy. They go for the hollywood passes all the time to make themseleves look good in front of the nation. This certainly applies to players such as Adam and Gerrard. the media raves over a 1/10 successful hollywood pass that they make, and then they get publicised as the next best thing, when, in reality they are just another run of the mill midfielder who can't dictate a game.
Carrick on the other hand is a superb team player. Never in the limelight and just does his job that he is set to do. A player with excellent workrate and understanding of football.
It is a shame that England idiotically chose hollywood players such as Gerrard and Lampard over natural born winners and team players such as Scholes and Carrick.
The reason England are so poor is because Gerrard and Lampard have never dictated a midfield
TheRangersFan wrote:Charlie Adam is worse version of Chris Brunt, but with alot more hype. I can see him being found out next season.
Carrick?Blackpool Rule wrote:i think its obvious who i voted for
Mutant123 wrote:Carrick?Blackpool Rule wrote:i think its obvious who i voted for
Blackpool Rule wrote:Mutant123 wrote:Carrick?Blackpool Rule wrote:i think its obvious who i voted for
spot on
TheRangersFan wrote:Charlie Adam is worse version of Chris Brunt, but with alot more hype. I can see him being found out next season.
chiboygeorge wrote:You are exaggerating it. Carrick is a decent player, I don't see what Adam has done to be better than Carrick.Scouser_Dave wrote:Carrick winning the poll
Off topic. ObsessedLiamB_14 wrote:Quite clearly the answer is Michael Carrick for ovious reasons
It is like Paul Scholes was saying the other day. Certain individuals are greedy. They go for the hollywood passes all the time to make themseleves look good in front of the nation. This certainly applies to players such as Adam and Gerrard. the media raves over a 1/10 successful hollywood pass that they make, and then they get publicised as the next best thing, when, in reality they are just another run of the mill midfielder who can't dictate a game.
Carrick on the other hand is a superb team player. Never in the limelight and just does his job that he is set to do. A player with excellent workrate and understanding of football.
It is a shame that England idiotically chose hollywood players such as Gerrard and Lampard over natural born winners and team players such as Scholes and Carrick.
The reason England are so poor is because Gerrard and Lampard have never dictated a midfield
