Charlie Adam vs Chris Brunt

Both are shite, Brunt is only useful for his set pieces, both are renown for their left foot ability, both came up from the championship and have adapted to the premier league, both play for midtable premier league teams. Discuss...

Chris Brunt - £3 million
Charlie Adam - £8 million

Ed wrote:Both are shite, Both are only useful for their set pieces, both are renown for their set pieces, both came up from the championship and have adapted to the premier league, both play for midtable premier league teams. Discuss...

Chris Brunt - £3 million
Charlie Adam - £8 million

LOL

Jordo wrote:

Ed wrote:Both are shite, Both are only useful for their set pieces, both are renown for their set pieces, both came up from the championship and have adapted to the premier league, both play for midtable premier league teams. Discuss...

Chris Brunt - £3 million
Charlie Adam - £8 million

LOL

he does do some good ones

EDIT - just relised, he is pretty shite at set pieces

I like Brunt.

Brunt is actually okay. He contributes a lot to the team.

Most obvious 'Liverpool are a midtable team' thread ever.

Is Brunt a starter for West Brom these days?

Gatsby wrote:I like Brunt.

he does some good things

George wrote:Brunt is actually okay. He contributes a lot to the team.

no he isnt, you dont watch him play every week, he is West Brom's worst player in the Starting XI atm. All people see is the 1 or 2 good things he does in the game, they dont show all the wasted balls and failed dribbles/tackles throughout the game on MOTD.

Gegilworld93 wrote:Is Brunt a starter for West Brom these days?

Yes, hes our captain, no idea why though.

Think his left foot's a lot more solid than Adam's and for 5 million cheaper I'd take Brunt.