Nani or Nasri

Chris wrote:

Cadbury wrote:Van Persie.

bitdriver wrote:Nani because my team already has Nasri


On a serious note, Nani gets my vote because he is more consistent than Nasri, when Nasri is at his best he is some player but he likes to come inside from a wide position while Nani's game is all about width, different players but Nani wins simply because he produces great performances on a regular basis, if Nasri was as consistent and could produce his amazing form he had at Arsenal for a few months last season I would choose him for Manchester City as he has better short passing and plays inside rather than on the wing often which fits into our system of possession football.

kyro7 wrote:

Chris wrote:

That gif is so annoying, I kept looking at it wanting to see what happened next.

cheesy wrote:I would rather have Nani in my team, without any shadow of a doubt. He's the better crosser, dribbler, has better ball control and has proven himself over a longer period of time, as opposed to Nasri who built up his reputation over half a season alone. Nasri is a very good player, however he's yet to show me that he can consistently deliver, like Nani has been doing.

Fonseca wrote:

bitdriver wrote:Nani because my team already has Nasri


On a serious note, Nani gets my vote because he is more consistent than Nasri, when Nasri is at his best he is some player but he likes to come inside from a wide position while Nani's game is all about width, different players but Nani wins simply because he produces great performances on a regular basis, if Nasri was as consistent and could produce his amazing form he had at Arsenal for a few months last season I would choose him for Manchester City as he has better short passing and plays inside rather than on the wing often which fits into our system of possession football.

That's because he's an attacking mid not a winger

Fonseca wrote:

cheesy wrote:I would rather have Nani in my team, without any shadow of a doubt. He's the better crosser, dribbler, has better ball control and has proven himself over a longer period of time, as opposed to Nasri who built up his reputation over half a season alone. Nasri is a very good player, however he's yet to show me that he can consistently deliver, like Nani has been doing.

No

Fonseca wrote:

cheesy wrote:I would rather have Nani in my team, without any shadow of a doubt. He's the better crosser, dribbler, has better ball control and has proven himself over a longer period of time, as opposed to Nasri who built up his reputation over half a season alone. Nasri is a very good player, however he's yet to show me that he can consistently deliver, like Nani has been doing.

No