I don't know why people keep saying Nasri can play as a winger... first of all Arsenal don't play with true wingers that keep as much width as Manchester United and their 4-4-2. second of all even in nasri playing as the wide forward in Arsenal's system he isn't near as effective. He was rocking shit up earlier this season because he actually got to play in the Fabregas role which he is much more suited for..not to mention has had a better season there then Fabregas has. As far as I'm concerned Nasri is a CAM/CM and Nani is a winger and neither of them are that versatile, but absolutely incredible at the positions they play
+32
VivaRonaldoLAD
bitdriver
hoggyboy
Cadbury
Steadman
Jeff
Ben 10
MCFCSilva10
dena
El_indian
Childish Logic
AriseForLife
SBSP
El Jefe
luke.
Gegilworld93
fluffy_kittens
wellz
Impeccabubble
samiz
Carlos Jenkinson
Marvin
blackskar
Jordi
The Zlatan
Ricardo
Sean
Kuled
Lux
Zzonked
Jamie
Jord
36 posters
Nani or Nasri
Poll
Who would you rather have in your team?
- [ 28 ]
[55%]
- [ 23 ]
- [45%]
Total Votes: 51
wellz-
- Posts : 1073
Age : 35
Location : Washington D.C.
Supports : The Troops
El Jefe-
- Formerly known as : Jay
Posts : 10657
Location : In the hall, already, on the wall, already
Supports : Pixie Lott's Legs
Liverpool need a winger like Nani, so I went for him.
Sean-
- Posts : 33857
Age : 30
Tbf Walcott plays pretty wide, but I dont think Arsenal play with symmetrical wings, it looks more to me like they tuck Nasri in more central and play Walcott wider on the other side. Wingers arnt really needed that much though for Arsneal, I mean how many times do Arsenal cross the ball.
Carlos Jenkinson-
- Posts : 10964
Marvin wrote:Not that much difference tbh, both can pick out great passes but I think Nani edges it for me. His movement is better, decision making is questionable at times though.
Plus our wingers are shit, so yeah.
There's a lot of difference, if Fabregas had speed you'd probably be saying the same ish
AriseForLife-
- Posts : 2473
Nasri quite easily.
Childish Logic-
- Formerly known as : NZG
Posts : 13745
Age : 32
Supports : Lucas
Different players. If you want a winger you take nani, if you want a playmaker you take nasri
Childish Logic-
- Formerly known as : NZG
Posts : 13745
Age : 32
Supports : Lucas
So i'm voting nasri, Has more talent
El_indian-
- Posts : 8448
Location : New Zealand
Supports : funny
Nasri would be mint in the hole behind 2 strikers
Carlos Jenkinson-
- Posts : 10964
Eternal Witcher wrote:Nani. Better on fifa.
Nasri is 85, Nani's like 83
Jord-
- Formerly known as : SUPAH BURNLEY!
Posts : 33665
Location : Equestria
Supports : Liverpool FC
This still going on? Brilliant 
Guest- Guest
based on stats(goals/assists), nani by a long way
based on ball control and dribbling i think Nasri edges it
based on ball control and dribbling i think Nasri edges it
Guest- Guest
El_indian wrote:Nasri would be mint in the hole behind 2 strikers
El_indian-
- Posts : 8448
Location : New Zealand
Supports : funny
hahah nice gif
dena-
- Posts : 18688
Age : 35
Location : only place to find base heads and hot women
Anyone else think they are too different to compare?
wellz-
- Posts : 1073
Age : 35
Location : Washington D.C.
Supports : The Troops
dena wrote:Anyone else think they are too different to compare?
read my post at the top of the page.
MCFCSilva10-
- Posts : 103
19Jones19v wrote:Nasri as he can play multiple positions, whereas Nani's pretty much restricted to the wing.
Nasri's the better player as well, yeah I said it WHAT?
Zlatan wrote:Nasri.
Zlatan wrote:Nasri has still performed well, he just hasn't got any goals or assists.
blackskar wrote:Nasri.
Better all round player.
Gegilworld93 wrote:Both very exctiting players but Nasri by far for me, Nani is a flair winger with a good shot, beating his opponent with pace and trickery but is lacking vision and is way too selfish at times, not to mention the odd disgraceful dive, whereas Nasri is a great dribbler of the ball as well, but more of a no.10, with great vision and passing, can play on either side of the wing and as a CAM, while Nani is best on the right wing.
SBSP wrote:Nasri by a long way.
AriseForLife wrote:Nasri quite easily.
Arsenal fans
Ben 10-
- Posts : 10205
Age : 28
Location : Preston
Supports : Preston North End F.C.
Stop bumping threads phaggot
Jeff-
- Formerly known as : Jeffharper2011
Posts : 3868
Age : 33
Location : Liverpool,Merseyside
Supports : Liverpool
Nasri
Guest- Guest
Out wide Nani, central Nasri.
Just before Nasri left Arsenal Wenger played him in the middle and he played very well, thats his natural position and if played there consistently he would run a game against anyone. Nani out wide will tear teams to shreds though.
Just before Nasri left Arsenal Wenger played him in the middle and he played very well, thats his natural position and if played there consistently he would run a game against anyone. Nani out wide will tear teams to shreds though.
Jord-
- Formerly known as : SUPAH BURNLEY!
Posts : 33665
Location : Equestria
Supports : Liverpool FC
Hindsight as usual.
But Nani is Sky Sports player of the year so do what you want.
But Nani is Sky Sports player of the year so do what you want.
Steadman-
- Posts : 6134
Age : 32
Location : London
Supports : I have humor, yes.
Both are a little inconsistent.
Depends what type of player you're looking for.
Depends what type of player you're looking for.
Cadbury-
- Posts : 23487
Age : 31
Location : Blackpool
Supports : Not Kenny.
Van Persie.
hoggyboy-
- Posts : 282
Supports : chelsea
nicolas anelka
bitdriver-
- Posts : 76
Supports : Manchester City
Nani because my team already has Nasri 
On a serious note, Nani gets my vote because he is more consistent than Nasri, when Nasri is at his best he is some player but he likes to come inside from a wide position while Nani's game is all about width, different players but Nani wins simply because he produces great performances on a regular basis, if Nasri was as consistent and could produce his amazing form he had at Arsenal for a few months last season I would choose him for Manchester City as he has better short passing and plays inside rather than on the wing often which fits into our system of possession football.
On a serious note, Nani gets my vote because he is more consistent than Nasri, when Nasri is at his best he is some player but he likes to come inside from a wide position while Nani's game is all about width, different players but Nani wins simply because he produces great performances on a regular basis, if Nasri was as consistent and could produce his amazing form he had at Arsenal for a few months last season I would choose him for Manchester City as he has better short passing and plays inside rather than on the wing often which fits into our system of possession football.
VivaRonaldoLAD-
- Posts : 14745
Location : United Road.
Supports : Giggsy 12-0 Gerrard
Ah, I see Leo has returned 
Similar topics
