Summer Transfers 2015

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

Scott_LFC wrote:

So? Same applies for the other 3 defenders you numbskull.

If you'd been to a proper university you wouldn't say things like this.

Lazy retort.

I'd probably rephrase it to if you chose a better course than advertising where you actually have to understand research methods and analytical skills.

Theo Filippo wrote:I'd probably rephrase it to if you chose a better course than advertising where you actually have to understand research methods and analytical skills.

Lmao if you think Advertising involves no research or analytical practises

Yeah, companies create million pound adverts with absolutely no research or analysing

Stupid fuck.

Ok, you must've been shit at it then.

RR's statement is 100% correct then, the university is shit.

Scott_LFC wrote:

Keyser Söze wrote:So you agree Sakho has been shit for Liverpool?

Er, no. I'm proving the point that if you put him a team with better defensive organisation, his defensive errors score goes down to "the norm" for the PL's better CBs like Koscielny.

How is that picture proving that?

Keyser Söze wrote:

Scott_LFC wrote:

Er, no. I'm proving the point that if you put him a team with better defensive organisation, his defensive errors score goes down to "the norm" for the PL's better CBs like Koscielny.

How is that picture proving that?

What the fuck?

Theo Filippo wrote:Ok, you must've been shit at it then.

RR's statement is 100% correct then, the university is shit.

If my comment was stupid, yours was fucking retarded No research or analysing in advertising, omfg lmao.

Yeah I was so shit at it. That's why I got a job in Advertising

I literally don't care how good or bad the University I went to is so attempting to use that as a stick to beat me with isn't effective.

Stay on topic, thicko.

Scott_LFC wrote:

Keyser Söze wrote:

How is that picture proving that?

What the fuck?

You used the same seasons to compare Sakho. What you're saying is that if in 2 seasons a player isn't playing as well as he used to then he hasn't regressed he's just playing in a worse team.

Scott_LFC wrote:

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

If you'd been to a proper university you wouldn't say things like this.

Lazy retort.

It really isn't, at Universities with reputations students are taught about the importance of sample sizes. Knowing the value of the data you see is a crucial part of using knowledge to improve your mind.

Keyser Söze wrote:

Scott_LFC wrote:

What the fuck?

You used the same seasons to compare Sakho. What you're saying is that if in 2 seasons a player isn't playing as well as he used to then he hasn't regressed he's just playing in a worse team.

Are you talking about the same Man United you've been calling shit all season? That Atletico team finished 3rd in La Liga, less than 10 points behind Real Madrid.

Are you being retarded on purpose?

Scott_LFC wrote:

Theo Filippo wrote:Ok, you must've been shit at it then.

RR's statement is 100% correct then, the university is shit.

If my comment was stupid, yours was fucking retarded No research or analysing in advertising, omfg lmao.

Yeah I was so shit at it. That's why I got a job in Advertising

I literally don't care how good or bad the University I went to is so attempting to use that as a stick to beat me with isn't effective.

Stay on topic, thicko.

The mistake that someone who hasn't studied research method based modules makes is confusing research and research methods as the same thing. This is why you couldn't understand RR's initial point about the 4 games.  This pencil advertising business of yours is definitely failing.

why are stats being used to compare defenders

vel wrote:why are stats being used to compare defenders

Because Scott's putting to use his analytical skills that he learned at the second worst university in the country.

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

Scott_LFC wrote:

Lazy retort.

It really isn't, at Universities with reputations students are taught about the importance of sample sizes.  Knowing the value of the data you see is a crucial part of using knowledge to improve your mind.

Of course a larger sample size would be a more accurate representation. Although it's only 4-6 games, it offers some insight into the performances of each individual player in the biggest footballing competition in the World.

What is everyone's fucking obsession with bringing up where I studied my degree or post I've made in the past?

Stick to the fucking topic at hand you utter spastics Cheap shots are desperate.

Scott_LFC wrote:

Keyser Söze wrote:

You used the same seasons to compare Sakho. What you're saying is that if in 2 seasons a player isn't playing as well as he used to then he hasn't regressed he's just playing in a worse team.

Are you talking about the same Man United you've been calling shit all season? That Atletico team finished 3rd in La Liga, less than 10 points behind Real Madrid.

Are you being retarded on purpose?

Which was my point you moron

So Falcao hasn't regressed at all. He's just been bad because he's playing for a worse team. It's entirely not his fault, right?

EDIT: Also I love how insecure you are about being a thick shit That's why you don't want people talking about your 2:2 Media degree from The University of Bedfordshire, because it's the ultimate proof you're a moron. Shit grade for a shit course from a shit uni. Doesn't get lower than that.

Keyser Söze wrote:

Scott_LFC wrote:

Are you talking about the same Man United you've been calling shit all season? That Atletico team finished 3rd in La Liga, less than 10 points behind Real Madrid.

Are you being retarded on purpose?

Which was my point you moron

So Falcao hasn't regressed at all. He's just been bad because he's playing for a worse team. It's entirely not his fault, right?

EDIT: Also I love how insecure you are about being a thick shit That's why don't want people talking about your 2:2 Media degree from The University of Bedfordshire, because it's the ultimate proof you're a moron.

Watch Falcao get better stats at Chelsea.

Scott_LFC wrote:

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

It really isn't, at Universities with reputations students are taught about the importance of sample sizes.  Knowing the value of the data you see is a crucial part of using knowledge to improve your mind.

Of course a larger sample size would be a more accurate representation. Although it's only 4-6 games, it offers some insight into the performances of each individual player  in the biggest footballing competition in the World.

What is everyone's fucking obsession with bringing up where I studied my degree or post I've made in the past?

Stick to the fucking topic at hand you utter spastics Cheap shots are desperate.

So we've learnt that Sakho made a few more tackles than a few other defenders in 4 games? Great.

Because where you've "studied" gives us an idea of the kind of person we're dealing with.

Better than his at Atletico, right? Because that's what your logic states.

Lmfao 3 people have literally turned this debate about Sakho as a defender into targeting my degree and the University I went to

Keyser Söze wrote:Better than his at Atletico, right? Because that's what your logic states.

Maybe not quite as good. He's getting old now. Falcao has regressed a bit, Sakho hasn't. Sakho's only 25 His prime is ahead of him.

Because it's relevant.

Theo Filippo wrote:Because it's relevant.

What about the fact I got a job at a huge company's head office or at a decent Advertising agency?

Scott_LFC wrote:

Theo Filippo wrote:Because it's relevant.

What about the fact I got a job at a huge company's head office or at a decent Advertising agency?

Not a measure of your intelligence and cleaning jobs are easy to get.

Scott_LFC wrote:

Keyser Söze wrote:Better than his at Atletico, right? Because that's what your logic states.

Maybe not quite as good. He's getting old now. Falcao has regressed a bit, Sakho hasn't. Sakho's only 25 His prime is ahead of him.

Like De Sciglio? 2 years ago he was the next Maldini and one of Milan's and Italy's best players. Now he's one of Serie A's worst players and off to Ligue 1 for next to nothing



But anyone under 25 can never regress, right?

Theo Filippo wrote:

Scott_LFC wrote:

What about the fact I got a job at a huge company's head office or at a decent Advertising agency?

Not a measure of your intelligence and cleaning jobs are easy to get.

Yet I have £20k+ free cash in my bank account.

Scott_LFC wrote:

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

It really isn't, at Universities with reputations students are taught about the importance of sample sizes.  Knowing the value of the data you see is a crucial part of using knowledge to improve your mind.

Of course a larger sample size would be a more accurate representation. Although it's only 4-6 games, it offers some insight into the performances of each individual player  in the biggest footballing competition in the World.

What is everyone's fucking obsession with bringing up where I studied my degree or post I've made in the past?

Stick to the fucking topic at hand you utter spastics Cheap shots are desperate.

Fair enough, the shots at your lack of education were unwarranted, I thought it might help you see what I was talking about yesterday regarding what you go to University for. Regardless of that, your point was still fucking retarded.

The size of the competition in the sense you're talking about doesn't make any difference to the value of the sample. It offers roughly as much insight as picking 4 random games from last season and comparing them, probably less so given the variances in quality of opponent in the Premier League compared to the World Cup.

Scott_LFC wrote:

Theo Filippo wrote:
Not a measure of your intelligence and cleaning jobs are easy to get.

Yet I have £20k+ free cash in my bank account.

Sugary silver spoon.

Keyser Söze wrote:

Scott_LFC wrote:

Maybe not quite as good. He's getting old now. Falcao has regressed a bit, Sakho hasn't. Sakho's only 25 His prime is ahead of him.

Like De Sciglio? 2 years ago he was the next Maldini and one of Milan's and Italy's best players. Now he's one of Serie A's worst players and off to Ligue 1 for next to nothing



But anyone under 25 can never regress, right?

Because Sakho has a defence score in the minuses too

Scott_LFC wrote:

Theo Filippo wrote:
Not a measure of your intelligence and cleaning jobs are easy to get.

Yet I have £20k+ free cash in my bank account.

That's probably got a bit to do with you leeching off your family for years rather than anything related to having a good job, isn't it?  Nobody on a real graduate job could support themselves and manage to save up £20,000 then go for nearly a year unemployed. A cleaner who has mummy and daddy pay for everything probably could in pretty short order though.

Scott_LFC wrote:

Keyser Söze wrote:

Like De Sciglio? 2 years ago he was the next Maldini and one of Milan's and Italy's best players. Now he's one of Serie A's worst players and off to Ligue 1 for next to nothing



But anyone under 25 can never regress, right?

Because Sakho has a defence score in the minuses too

That's not the point. The point is you are seemingly saying that younger players (under 25?) can't regress, which is incredibly fucking stupid.