Liverpool FC Official Thread

I prefer it like that tbh, a new kit to represent a different season to look back on, I don't buy them anyway so the money is not an issue.

CollieBuddz wrote:This is apparantly the new home kit that the money grabbing bastards are releasing after one season.

Hm, I don't think that I'll be buying that one, literally looks like they got rid of the collar, added a bit on the sleeves and at the neck and that's it

Also, that is definitely photoshopped

I doubt kit makers make physical copies of all ideas they have for potential new shirts.

Sturridge will also help the squad on FIFA, though no doubt he'll be docked a few rating points for moving to Liverpool.

Mustangt125 wrote:Sturridge will also help the squad on FIFA, though no doubt he'll be docked a few rating points for moving to Liverpool.

Or due to the fact that he hasn't really played this season

Glen Johnson HAS to be upgraded on FIFA in January

arsenalap11 wrote:

Mustangt125 wrote:Sturridge will also help the squad on FIFA, though no doubt he'll be docked a few rating points for moving to Liverpool.

Or due to the fact that he hasn't really played this season

He's played 12 times.

Glen has never got any respect on FIFA.

Templeton7|RFC wrote:

arsenalap11 wrote:

Or due to the fact that he hasn't really played this season

He's played 12 times.

Of which he's started 2..

Mustangt125 wrote:Glen has never got any respect on FIFA.

The fact that he still has cornrows speaks volumes.

It's always FIFA with Mustang, isn't it?

We're discussing the ratings of Liverpool players in the LFC thread.....but yes you're right.

It will help massively on FIFA.

And even though he has never gotten any love, Glen is still fun to get forward with and he can beat people.

Another positive will be Sterling. He's sure to get a few improvements, meaning he'll be quicker.

Sturridge if he comes will be a nice addition too... Because he's fast.

If they're gonna basically make Chamberlain a 99 after he debuted for Arsenal and England then Sterling should get a boost. What is he like a 69?

Mustangt125 wrote:If they're gonna basically make Chamberlain a 99 after he debuted for Arsenal and England then Sterling should get a boost. What is he like a 69?

Yeah, by basically 99 you mean 79 or whatever he is.

Chamberlain should be about 15 ratings higher than him.

kyro7 wrote:Chamberlain should be about 15 ratings higher than him.

They should be the same in my opinion. Bias may be kicking in but they're both good young players and I don't see much between them. Sterling has proven so far that he's just as good as Chamberlain was in his first season with Arsenal.

Jord wrote:

kyro7 wrote:Chamberlain should be about 15 ratings higher than him.

They should be the same in my opinion. Bias may be kicking in but they're both good young players and I don't see much between them. Sterling has proven so far that he's just as good as Chamberlain was in his first season with Arsenal.

Chamberlains played 43 games for Arsenal and 9 for England with 11 goals/assists including good games against teams like Milan. Starting 30 games. Not to mention a full season playing in the Championship with 17 goals/assists.

Sterlings played 30 games for Liverpool, 1 for England with 4 goals/assists, don't think he's stood out against any big teams? Started 18 of those games.

They're not miles apart, but Sterling shouldn't be the same as Chamberlain, they should be 5-10 points apart.

Here we go..

Nothing to go about, just don't think Sterling has enough experience to warrant having the game rating as Chamberlain, not that it matters really

Chamberlain is comfortably a better footballer than Sterling Jord, both will have bright futures but trust me Chamberlain warrants being a lot higher rated.

I think Chamberlain should be rated higher based on his return and more experience, agreed.

I was juts pointing out the similarities fo the two coming onto the scene I suppose. In fact I didnt say he should match AOC's rating, juts that Sterling should get a boost.

arsenalap11 wrote:

Jord wrote:They should be the same in my opinion. Bias may be kicking in but they're both good young players and I don't see much between them. Sterling has proven so far that he's just as good as Chamberlain was in his first season with Arsenal.

Chamberlains played 43 games for Arsenal and 9 for England with 11 goals/assists including good games against teams like Milan. Starting 30 games. Not to mention a full season playing in the Championship with 17 goals/assists.

Sterlings played 30 games for Liverpool, 1 for England with 4 goals/assists, don't think he's stood out against any big teams? Started 18 of those games.

They're not miles apart, but Sterling shouldn't be the same as Chamberlain, they should be 5-10 points apart.

League One...

Harrold wrote:

arsenalap11 wrote:

Chamberlains played 43 games for Arsenal and 9 for England with 11 goals/assists including good games against teams like Milan. Starting 30 games. Not to mention a full season playing in the Championship with 17 goals/assists.

Sterlings played 30 games for Liverpool, 1 for England with 4 goals/assists, don't think he's stood out against any big teams? Started 18 of those games.

They're not miles apart, but Sterling shouldn't be the same as Chamberlain, they should be 5-10 points apart.

League One...

Ah my bad, yea League one.

I think Chamberlain is only slightly better than Sterling. He hasn't been that good this season (Chamberlain).

Sterling has clearly got talent but has been overrated because of how shit Liverpool are, Chamberlain has looked so classy on a big stage.

I think Chamberlin is better technically than Sterling.

Considering very few of our performances have been shit I wouldn't say that's the reason people over rate him, if we were doing well people would still think he was just as good.

Sterling is better YNWA