Swansea vs Liverpool | Match Thread | 1:30pm | Sunday.

S. wrote:

menalawyerguy wrote:

Do ya now?

Don't worry sweetie pie, he'll be home later tonight.

Ah, the good ol' gay jokes.

It was a hetero joke. You said middle so I figured that was a reference to your pussy.

Shit game.

Shit 2nd half.

Good game, especially for a 0 - 0.

Was sure Swansea would have it in the last 10 but Liverpool got away with it.

Decent game for 0-0 unfortunate there weren't any goals really.

We got away with it?

Draw was a fair result, disappointed at lack of ambition

There was plenty of ambition. Most guys ran their asses off. It was a lack of ability that was Liverpool's problem today.

Theo Filippo wrote:Good game, especially for a 0 - 0.

Agreed, the quality of the first touches and the passing was sublime.

menalawyerguy wrote:

S. wrote:

Ah, the good ol' gay jokes.

It was a hetero joke. You said middle so I figured that was a reference to your pussy.

And the jokes just keep coming! You're on a roll!

Knee slapping stuff right there.

Largely i think Swansea were the better team, what i mean with getting away with it is that in the last part of the 2nd half i thought Swansea were clearly better. Although they have a striker problem, Graham wasn't scoring and Itay wasn't or isn't the solution. Pablo seems like a real steal for just £5.55m

Swansea has great attacking support but lack striking capabilities, while Liverpool is certainly lacking in the department of supporting Suarez, probably more of a form issue than the what the players have been or are capable of, gerrard was dreadful today and Downing was the Downing we've gotten used to since he was picked up by Liverpool, which Leaves Suarez and Sterling as the direct attacking threat.

In many ways Swansea reminds me of Ajax, with strikers not being avaliable/hitting anything so the midfielders need to score the goals, which they weren't able to do today.

Should have had a penalty on Agger and Enrique's goal was onside. Other than that it was an equal game, but that goal could have really changed things.

Alan wrote:Should have had a penalty on Agger and Enrique's goal was onside. Other than that it was an equal game, but that goal could have really changed things.

No. The tackle was fair and Agger had lost the ball before the other guy made any contact. Enrique's goal wasn't onside.

Pretty sure that was a troll post though Jimmy.

AndItsKoren! wrote:

Alan wrote:Should have had a penalty on Agger and Enrique's goal was onside. Other than that it was an equal game, but that goal could have really changed things.

No. The tackle was fair and Agger had lost the ball before the other guy made any contact. Enrique's goal wasn't onside.

Pretty sure that was a troll post though Jimmy.

Are you fucking blind or did you just not see it as it showed it on Sky and he was onside, but a very hard one to notice. And i will fix it for you, to have your fucking head knocked the fuck off, and i will give you a badge before its done.

You James, or are you still talking pish and telling lies.

Enrique was offside.

Enrique looked just off to me, but so marginal.

Yeah, Alan, Enrique was offside.

Jeff wrote:Enrique was offside.

kyro7 wrote:Enrique looked just off to me, but so marginal.

Glen Damon wrote:Yeah, Alan, Enrique was offside.

Are you all blind?

ENRIQUE WAS OFFSIDE

Glen Damon wrote:Yeah, Alan, Enrique was offside.

It showed it on Sky and im telling you, the Swansea defender's foot was keeping him onside. I thought it was offside until it showed it again, but it was a really hard one to notice until it showed it from this angle.




The white line is where Chico torres foot was, and as ive said it was hard to notice but it was onside.

That picture is wrong lmfao. Look at the line compared to the 6 yard line. You idiot.

Just saw it again on MoTD and Chico's foot was actually playing him onside. Either way, it was very tight and we never seem to get the benefit of the doubt when it comes to important decisions.

AndItsKoren! wrote:That picture is wrong lmfao. Look at the line compared to the 6 yard line. You idiot.

It showed it again on Sky after the Chelsea v City game, and it showed he was onside and they all agreed it was. Although as i said it was so hard to notice as it was only his foot that kept him on, and it just showed it on MOTD 2 you fucking clown.

He was off. Looking at the picture above and ignoring the wonky line, Enrique's arm would at least be offside.

S. wrote:Just saw it again on MoTD and Chico's foot was actually playing him onside. Either way, it was very tight and we never seem to get the benefit of the doubt when it comes to important decisions.

Thats all i was saying Scott, and it was a really hard one to notice.

Definitely onside, they just showed a very revealing angle.

Seen it on MOTD. His hand was offside.

Lol at you trying to use the arm. He can't score with his arm. The main thing are the feet when it comes to offside decisions.

AndItsKoren! wrote:He was off. Looking at the picture above and ignoring the wonky line, Enrique's arm would at least be offside.

I thought the rule was that you can only be deemed offside if the body part in an offside position is one you can legally use to score.

I still think it was off, though.

AndItsKoren! wrote:He was off. Looking at the picture above and ignoring the wonky line, Enrique's arm would at least be offside.

You dont know the rules then, its only a part of the body you are allowed to score with. And well you are not allowed to score with your arm or hand.

Just rewound it and had another look. Even his arm/hand is in line with Chico's foot.