Glen Johnson "Evra made it clear he really didn't want to ..

easley91 wrote:I got bored of this subject ages ago. Why bring it up again? it was dead and buried, people moved on. If Johnson wanted to say something he should've said it around the time it was all going on.

‘He’s following Luis with his eyes as if to say: “Right he’s gone, he’s gone (past me) so I’ll pull him back now…” Evra probably stayed up all night thinking about how to do that. The whole thing was ridiculous.’

Scott. wrote:

easley91 wrote:I got bored of this subject ages ago. Why bring it up again? it was dead and buried, people moved on. If Johnson wanted to say something he should've said it around the time it was all going on.

Retard.

The journalist asked him questions, he answered, simple as that.

It would probably reflect badly if he refused to answer them, making it seem like he isn't sure whether Suarez was racist or not, but by answering the questions, he's shown that he fully backs Suarez, and sees Evra as a sly cunt.

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

Scott. wrote:

Retard.

The journalist asked him questions, he answered, simple as that.

It would probably reflect badly if he refused to answer them, making it seem like he isn't sure whether Suarez was racist or not, but by answering the questions, he's shown that he fully backs Suarez, and sees Evra as a sly cunt.

He should have answered with "No comment." Even Suarez doesn't back Suarez on this issue.

Scott. wrote:

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

He should have answered with "No comment." Even Suarez doesn't back Suarez on this issue.

Maybe he felt the need to air his opinion, much like you do.

Scott. wrote:

easley91 wrote:I got bored of this subject ages ago. Why bring it up again? it was dead and buried, people moved on. If Johnson wanted to say something he should've said it around the time it was all going on.

Retard.

The journalist asked him questions, he answered, simple as that.

It would probably reflect badly if he refused to answer them, making it seem like he isn't sure whether Suarez was racist or not, but by answering the questions, he's shown that he fully backs Suarez, and sees Evra as a sly cunt.

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

Scott. wrote:

Maybe he felt the need to air his opinion, much like you do.

Airing his opinion is one thing, making slanderous/libellous comments about Paul McGrath and Patrice Evra is extremely unprofessional.

Alan wrote:

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

Airing his opinion is one thing, making slanderous/libellous comments about Paul McGrath and Patrice Evra is extremely unprofessional.

We will kill any bastard that gets in our way.

Laurencio wrote:

Alan wrote:We will kill any bastard that gets in our way.

Threats and inflamataroy language does not constitute libel or slander.

Laurencio wrote:

Alan wrote:We will kill any bastard that gets in our way.

Threats and inflamataroy language does not constitute libel or slander.

easley91 wrote:

Scott. wrote:

Retard.

The journalist asked him questions, he answered, simple as that.

It would probably reflect badly if he refused to answer them, making it seem like he isn't sure whether Suarez was racist or not, but by answering the questions, he's shown that he fully backs Suarez, and sees Evra as a sly cunt.

I'm a journalist, I know it's the job to ask questions, but even so Johnson could've avoided it and refused to answer them. It still looks bad on Liverpool bringing it up again, whether due to journo or Johnson.

Didn't know having an opinion on the matter made me a retard either.