drivescore wrote:crump wrote:A player who's name starts with R has signed a new contract.
Rosicky!
Great News!
How is that great news? He gets a pay increase for playing well in 5 games ffs
drivescore wrote:crump wrote:A player who's name starts with R has signed a new contract.
Rosicky!
Great News!
Rick Rosstrich wrote:Manchester City need to be sued. It's actually disgusting what they're doing. Sheik Mansour owns the Abu Dhabi newspaper The National and they have now released two stories about RVP in two days. One titled "Manchester City strike agreement for Arsenal's Robin van Persiee" another titled "Arsenal should cash in or risk losing out on Robin van Persie". What a horrendous way to tap someone up.
ResurrectionRooney wrote:Rick Rosstrich wrote:Manchester City need to be sued. It's actually disgusting what they're doing. Sheik Mansour owns the Abu Dhabi newspaper The National and they have now released two stories about RVP in two days. One titled "Manchester City strike agreement for Arsenal's Robin van Persiee" another titled "Arsenal should cash in or risk losing out on Robin van Persie". What a horrendous way to tap someone up.
Looks like good journalism to me.
If the owner mentions to the editor or a journalist that he has an agreement with van Persie's agent over a contract for him, what is the journalist supposed to do with that information? Shut his mouth and not print it?Rick Rosstrich wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:
Looks like good journalism to me.
Yep, it's great journalism. A bit weird that it's the only paper to report this Van Persie and Man City agreement. Also a bit weird that the paper is owned by the Manchester City owner and is now publishing story after story about him. Expect another in the next few days....
ResurrectionRooney wrote:If the owner mentions to the editor or a journalist that he has an agreement with van Persie's agent over a contract for him, what is the journalist supposed to do with that information? Shut his mouth and not print it?Rick Rosstrich wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:
Looks like good journalism to me.
Yep, it's great journalism. A bit weird that it's the only paper to report this Van Persie and Man City agreement. Also a bit weird that the paper is owned by the Manchester City owner and is now publishing story after story about him. Expect another in the next few days....
Laurencio wrote:Apparently Arsene Wenger has a man-crush on Younes Belhanda, and fully expect to bring him to Arsenal in the summer.
Rick Rosstrich wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:
If the owner mentions to the editor or a journalist that he has an agreement with van Persie's agent over a contract for him, what is the journalist supposed to do with that information? Shut his mouth and not print it?
You're not getting the point. There is no agreement. Other news sources around the world would be picking up on it if there was one little hint of the truth. They are publishing fabricated stories to try unsettle Van Persie.
ResurrectionRooney wrote:Rick Rosstrich wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:
If the owner mentions to the editor or a journalist that he has an agreement with van Persie's agent over a contract for him, what is the journalist supposed to do with that information? Shut his mouth and not print it?
You're not getting the point. There is no agreement. Other news sources around the world would be picking up on it if there was one little hint of the truth. They are publishing fabricated stories to try unsettle Van Persie.
I've seen multiple sources talking about van Persie to Arsenal, there could well be an agreement.
ResurrectionRooney wrote:Please refrain from editing my posts to try and make me look a fool. It is transparent.
If there is no agreement between Manchester City and van Persie then I await van Persie coming out and telling everyone there's no agreement, so he can embarrass that newspaper that has printed lies about him. He is also entitled to sue that newspaper as well, I look forward to seeing this go to court.
If he's not even aware of it then what's the problem?Rick Rosstrich wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:Please refrain from editing my posts to try and make me look a fool. It is transparent.
If there is no agreement between Manchester City and van Persie then I await van Persie coming out and telling everyone there's no agreement, so he can embarrass that newspaper that has printed lies about him. He is also entitled to sue that newspaper as well, I look forward to seeing this go to court.
If you pay attention to the media, that story has had barely any coverage in this country apart from on Twitter. I doubt he goes through Twitter searching for stories about himself.
Taking a leap out of my books
But
we'll beat Spurs, draw at Anfield although somethings telling me we'll
beat em 3-1. Someone wanna quote me again and get fooled? We'll beat
Sunderland and Newcastle with a draw at Everton mark my words, please
someone quote me
Rick Rosstrich wrote:The problem is a newspaper owned by Sheikh Mansour is publishing made up stories about our player agreeing terms with Manchester City.
BladeGunner wrote:Look at Gervinho just standing there instead of attacking the ball like Vermaelen. No attacking instinct whatsoever.
Mustangt125 wrote:Looks like you guys got some nice ManU extra time there....5 mins? fuck me.
Vermaelen seems to pop up with goals quite often. Always seems to do well when I have seen him
Mustangt125 wrote:Looks like you guys got some nice ManU extra time there....5 mins? fuck me.
Vermaelen seems to pop up with goals quite often. Always seems to do well when I have seen him
ResurrectionRooney wrote:Smalling is better, Vermaelen's goal shouldn't have even been allowed.