Scott Parker V Lucas Leiva

Aguerotelli wrote:Im sure if Lucas wasn't at Liverpool he would get a hell of a lot more praise

I'd rather, he stays out of the limelight.

The manager and fellow players appreciate what he does. That whats matters. Not the media.

Aguerotelli wrote:Im sure if Lucas wasn't at Liverpool he would get a hell of a lot more praise

your signature is really gay.

and your post is wrong.

Mr Leiva wrote:

Aguerotelli wrote:Im sure if Lucas wasn't at Liverpool he would get a hell of a lot more praise

I'd rather, he stays out of the limelight.

The manager and fellow players appreciate what he does. That whats matters. Not the media.

Agreed

justaddfinesse wrote:

Aguerotelli wrote:Im sure if Lucas wasn't at Liverpool he would get a hell of a lot more praise

your signature is really gay.

and your post is wrong.

I am sure if Lucas played for Arsenal your fans would claim him to be the best midfielder in the premier league

Sorry, if I derailed the thread a bit.

Mr Leiva wrote:Sorry, if I derailed the thread a bit.

The culprit would be Chris, by creating the thread.

Lucas and Spearing

Mc Babel wrote:Lucas and Spearing

Agreed.

Better than Lucas -- Adam in a 44 fucking 2.

Aguerotelli wrote:

Mr Leiva wrote:

I'd rather, he stays out of the limelight.

The manager and fellow players appreciate what he does. That whats matters. Not the media.

Agreed

justaddfinesse wrote:

your signature is really gay.

and your post is wrong.

I am sure if Lucas played for Arsenal your fans would claim him to be the best midfielder in the premier league

But its your season

Fonseca wrote:

Aguerotelli wrote:
Agreed


I am sure if Lucas played for Arsenal your fans would claim him to be the best midfielder in the premier league

But its your season

That getting old now.

Mr Leiva wrote:

Fonseca wrote:

But its your season

That getting old now.

Arsenal fans seem to use it alot more then us now

Fonseca wrote:

Aguerotelli wrote:
Agreed


I am sure if Lucas played for Arsenal your fans would claim him to be the best midfielder in the premier league

But its your season

HoF for you.

Don't worry Suarez is better than Messi and you have the next Van Basten

Sorry Mr Leiva

Fonseca wrote:Don't worry Suarez is better than Messi and you have the next Van Basten

Sorry Mr Leiva

Agreed, its a shame we dont have ''the next Xavi'' Aaron Ramsay

"The next Xavi"
That's a new one.

He just killed it

TBF, don't think anyone has said Carroll is the next Van Basten.

Inesta for Henderson, was Mauro made up phrase ...

Fonseca, disappointing.

Aguerotelli wrote:

Fonseca wrote:Don't worry Suarez is better than Messi and you have the next Van Basten

Sorry Mr Leiva

Agreed, its a shame we dont have ''the next Xavi'' Aaron Ramsay

ooooooooh

Mr Leiva wrote:TBF, don't think anyone has said Carroll is the next Van Basten.

Inesta for Henderson, was Mauro made up phrase ...

Fonseca, disappointing.

Also a Mauro phrase.

Mr Leiva wrote:TBF, don't think anyone has said Carroll is the next Van Basten.

Inesta for Henderson, was Mauro made up phrase ...

Fonseca, disappointing.

I look forward to your responses Fonseca, recently you have let your self down.

I demand a punishment of watching Santos as left back for season, which I can only say is fair.

Aguerotelli wrote:

Fonseca wrote:Don't worry Suarez is better than Messi and you have the next Van Basten

Sorry Mr Leiva

Agreed, its a shame we dont have ''the next Xavi'' Aaron Ramsay

Aaron Ramsey is much more like the next Lampard. He seriously plays like Lampard used to and its not a bad thing.

It's already in place unfortunately

coolhead33 wrote:

Lux wrote:I think Parker is one of those players where you can't question his workrate.

easley91 wrote:Parker usually gives 100% and has done in every Tottenham game he has played in. He allows the others to go and do their attacking things while he covers the in front of the back four.

I haven't seen him play this season apart from West Ham vs Leeds and he didn't look like he tried that game. I do believe that he has gave 100% for West Ham though. He just strikes me as the kind of player who only raises their game when needed which he didn't need to at West Ham as he knew he was already on his way out.

I think he was just really comfortable.

He practically walked through our team and slotted it into the goal from outside the box against us.

Fonseca wrote:It's already in place unfortunately

Sorry.

Mr Leiva wrote:
Many things he can improve on, is like going forward, which Parker is better than him. Shooting ect ... But after all, he is a DM. He also needs to improve defensivly a lot, to be up there with the best DM's in the world.
Shame he has an inferior center mid partner in Adam.

wasn't Lucas an attacking midfielder in Brazil?

We haven't seen a lot of it at Liverpool, maybe we should play him there and see how he does, would be interesting...

El_indian wrote:

Mr Leiva wrote:
Many things he can improve on, is like going forward, which Parker is better than him. Shooting ect ... But after all, he is a DM. He also needs to improve defensivly a lot, to be up there with the best DM's in the world.
Shame he has an inferior center mid partner in Adam.

wasn't Lucas an attacking midfielder in Brazil?

We haven't seen a lot of it at Liverpool, maybe we should play him there and see how he does, would be interesting...

http://www.redandwhitekop.com/forum/index.php?topic=278619.msg9118024#msg9118024

Read that.

Belter of a post. Explains a lot about Lucas's role in the team, and Brazilian play in general.

Lucas seems to give the ball away far too much, especially in his own half. IMO, he's nowhere near as good as Parker and there's a fair few i'd pick over him in my team. Go on Liverpool fans, get all mad and criticise my opinion...cheers boys.

Aguerotelli wrote:

Fonseca wrote:Don't worry Suarez is better than Messi and you have the next Van Basten

Sorry Mr Leiva

Agreed, its a shame we dont have ''the next Xavi'' Aaron Ramsay

Xavi is nothing compared to Aaron J. Ramsey. How dare you mention Xavi in the same sentence as the Welsh prince!

agree, Xavi is overrated.

Honestly, I don't think Lucas is bad, he just isn't better than Parker in my opinion. Parker is a much better passer and better at joining the attack. Lucas isn't nearly as good as Parker on the ball, but Lucas arguably has a better defensive game. And as said before Lucas still has lots of time to grow as a player, whereas Parker is approaching his prime.

El_indian wrote:agree, Xavi is overrated.