Official Arsenal FC Thread

The Bat-Man wrote:

Mustangt125 wrote:Your sinking ship is supported by a dirty, lazy Russian, ours is supported by one of the best attacking players in the world Luis Suarez.




Edit: Surely those stats are from last years game, not this years. We were the better team this year.

Arshavin was nominated for the Ballon D'Or, has Suarez been?

Arshavin scored 4 goals at Anfield in one game, has Suarez even scored 4 goals for Liverpool?

I rest my case.

Scott wrote:

arsenalap11 wrote:

Scott wrote:I don't see what that stat thing is supposed to be proving? Obviously Arsenal would have the better stats ... we were without Agger, Johnson, Gerrard, Kelly to begin with, then throughout the match we lost Carragher, Aurelio and Carroll. You had RvP, Fabregas and Nasri all on the pitch. If Arsenal didn't have the better stats, I would be fucking shocked.

You said we didn't come close to scoring and made out like you were the better team, when we clearly did and we were.

I never fucking said we were the better team, wtf. Just said you didn't really come close to scoring, and that's true. Apart from a RvP shot which Reina saved pretty comfortably, and the header that came off the post in the first half, which counts as off target anyway.

The Bat-Man wrote:Anyway why the fuck are we talking about Liverpool in the Arsenal thread?

Let's move on people.

The Bat-Man wrote:Anyway why the fuck are we talking about Liverpool in the Arsenal thread?

Let's move on people.

ResurrectionRooney wrote:Arshavin is a fantastic player, just as good as Suarez, if not better, he's just been played out of position for 2 and half years to accommodate better players.

Cadbury wrote:

The Bat-Man wrote:

Mustangt125 wrote:Your sinking ship is supported by a dirty, lazy Russian, ours is supported by one of the best attacking players in the world Luis Suarez.




Edit: Surely those stats are from last years game, not this years. We were the better team this year.

Arshavin was nominated for the Ballon D'Or, has Suarez been?

Arshavin scored 4 goals at Anfield in one game, has Suarez even scored 4 goals for Liverpool?

I rest my case.

He's only had a few months in the Premiership. Give him a chance. And yes, he's scored 6.

Next.

arsenalap11 wrote:

Scott wrote:

arsenalap11 wrote:

Scott wrote:I don't see what that stat thing is supposed to be proving? Obviously Arsenal would have the better stats ... we were without Agger, Johnson, Gerrard, Kelly to begin with, then throughout the match we lost Carragher, Aurelio and Carroll. You had RvP, Fabregas and Nasri all on the pitch. If Arsenal didn't have the better stats, I would be fucking shocked.

You said we didn't come close to scoring and made out like you were the better team, when we clearly did and we were.

I never fucking said we were the better team, wtf. Just said you didn't really come close to scoring, and that's true. Apart from a RvP shot which Reina saved pretty comfortably, and the header that came off the post in the first half, which counts as off target anyway.

It's not true, because we did come close to scoring. Hitting the post is as close to scoring as it gets..

arsenalap11 wrote:

Mustangt125 wrote:

The Bat-Man wrote:

Mustangt125 wrote:Your sinking ship is supported by a dirty, lazy Russian, ours is supported by one of the best attacking players in the world Luis Suarez.




Edit: Surely those stats are from last years game, not this years. We were the better team this year.

Arshavin was nominated for the Ballon D'Or, has Suarez been?

Arshavin scored 4 goals at Anfield in one game, has Suarez even scored 4 goals for Liverpool?

I rest my case.

Fantastic, that's one game.

If you had to pick a player to start your team and it was between Suarez and Arshavin, you are saying you would pick Arshavin?

You would have to be the biggest idiot on the planet to do that.

/Schooling

Why are you comparing Arshavin and Suarez in the first place?

Arshavin is on the bench for us, and Suarez is your best player

Cadbury wrote:

ResurrectionRooney wrote:Arshavin is a fantastic player, just as good as Suarez, if not better, he's just been played out of position for 2 and half years to accommodate better players.

He's no Ashley Young.

NoviNovak wrote:Senderos

kyro7 wrote:Arshavin now is not on Suarez's level, don't even try that.

ResurrectionRooney wrote:Arshavin is a fantastic player, just as good as Suarez, if not better, he's just been played out of position for 2 and half years to accommodate better players.

The Bat-Man wrote:Anyway why the fuck are we talking about Liverpool in the Arsenal thread?

Let's move on people.

The Bat-Man wrote:

I2eds_AVA wrote:You're fucked

Least we didn't spend £35 million on Carroll

Mustangt125 wrote:

arsenalap11 wrote:

Mustangt125 wrote:

The Bat-Man wrote:

Mustangt125 wrote:Your sinking ship is supported by a dirty, lazy Russian, ours is supported by one of the best attacking players in the world Luis Suarez.




Edit: Surely those stats are from last years game, not this years. We were the better team this year.

Arshavin was nominated for the Ballon D'Or, has Suarez been?

Arshavin scored 4 goals at Anfield in one game, has Suarez even scored 4 goals for Liverpool?

I rest my case.

Fantastic, that's one game.

If you had to pick a player to start your team and it was between Suarez and Arshavin, you are saying you would pick Arshavin?

You would have to be the biggest idiot on the planet to do that.

/Schooling

Why are you comparing Arshavin and Suarez in the first place?

Arshavin is on the bench for us, and Suarez is your best player

I posted, in response to the comparability of the two "sinking ships" that our ship was buoyed by Suarez, you guys have who left Arshavin? Who was being discussed as being totally invisible too many times.

Then one of the noobs went on about how he was nominated for Ballon d'Or or whatever. Then my response was if you would pick Arshavin over Suarez youre a dumbass.

The Bat-Man wrote:

kyro7 wrote:Arshavin now is not on Suarez's level, don't even try that.

I just did.

Come at me brah.

Suarez has been better than Arshavin recently, but form is temporary and class is permanent.

NoviNovak wrote:http://www.espn.co.uk/football/sport/video_audio/107393.html?sport=3

Senderos

Jord wrote:

The Bat-Man wrote:Anyway why the fuck are we talking about Liverpool in the Arsenal thread?

Let's move on people.

The Bat-Man wrote:

I2eds_AVA wrote:You're fucked

Least we didn't spend £35 million on Carroll

Thread was fine until this post.

The Bat-Man wrote:

Cadbury wrote:

The Bat-Man wrote:

Mustangt125 wrote:Your sinking ship is supported by a dirty, lazy Russian, ours is supported by one of the best attacking players in the world Luis Suarez.




Edit: Surely those stats are from last years game, not this years. We were the better team this year.

Arshavin was nominated for the Ballon D'Or, has Suarez been?

Arshavin scored 4 goals at Anfield in one game, has Suarez even scored 4 goals for Liverpool?

I rest my case.

He's only had a few months in the Premiership. Give him a chance. And yes, he's scored 6.

Next.

Arshavin had only a few months and he wasn't even fit because the Russian season doesn't start till March, and we all know what he did in his first 6 months.

NoviNovak wrote:

Cadbury wrote:

The Bat-Man wrote:

Cadbury wrote:

The Bat-Man wrote:

Mustangt125 wrote:Your sinking ship is supported by a dirty, lazy Russian, ours is supported by one of the best attacking players in the world Luis Suarez.




Edit: Surely those stats are from last years game, not this years. We were the better team this year.

Arshavin was nominated for the Ballon D'Or, has Suarez been?

Arshavin scored 4 goals at Anfield in one game, has Suarez even scored 4 goals for Liverpool?

I rest my case.

He's only had a few months in the Premiership. Give him a chance. And yes, he's scored 6.

Next.

Arshavin had only a few months and he wasn't even fit because the Russian season doesn't start till March, and we all know what he did in his first 6 months.

After those six months he did nothing. Stroll around a pitch with shit hair.

Suarez won't be fit for six months though will he? I'd say he's been doing well considering.

The Bat-Man wrote:

Jord wrote:

The Bat-Man wrote:Anyway why the fuck are we talking about Liverpool in the Arsenal thread?

Let's move on people.

The Bat-Man wrote:

I2eds_AVA wrote:You're fucked

Least we didn't spend £35 million on Carroll

Thread was fine until this post.

Great to see you have the dedication to look for that post, but I don't know if you've notice, I was replying to a Liverpool fan.

So, unfortunate for you, I am not the source of all evil.

Jamie wrote:

arsenalap11 wrote:

Scott wrote:

arsenalap11 wrote:

Scott wrote:I don't see what that stat thing is supposed to be proving? Obviously Arsenal would have the better stats ... we were without Agger, Johnson, Gerrard, Kelly to begin with, then throughout the match we lost Carragher, Aurelio and Carroll. You had RvP, Fabregas and Nasri all on the pitch. If Arsenal didn't have the better stats, I would be fucking shocked.

You said we didn't come close to scoring and made out like you were the better team, when we clearly did and we were.

I never fucking said we were the better team, wtf. Just said you didn't really come close to scoring, and that's true. Apart from a RvP shot which Reina saved pretty comfortably, and the header that came off the post in the first half, which counts as off target anyway.

It's not true, because we did come close to scoring. Hitting the post is as close to scoring as it gets..

Actually he's right. You didn't come close to scoring apart from the times you almost scored.

Perfectly reasonable post by Scott.

Jord wrote:

The Bat-Man wrote:

Jord wrote:

The Bat-Man wrote:Anyway why the fuck are we talking about Liverpool in the Arsenal thread?

Let's move on people.

The Bat-Man wrote:

I2eds_AVA wrote:You're fucked

Least we didn't spend £35 million on Carroll

Thread was fine until this post.

Great to see you have the dedication to look for that post, but I don't know if you've notice, I was replying to a Liverpool fan.

So, unfortunate for you, I am not the source of all evil.

But you brought up Liverpool first. Now let's do what you said and move on.

arsenalap11 wrote:

Jamie wrote:

arsenalap11 wrote:

Scott wrote:

arsenalap11 wrote:

You said we didn't come close to scoring and made out like you were the better team, when we clearly did and we were.

I never fucking said we were the better team, wtf. Just said you didn't really come close to scoring, and that's true. Apart from a RvP shot which Reina saved pretty comfortably, and the header that came off the post in the first half, which counts as off target anyway.

It's not true, because we did come close to scoring. Hitting the post is as close to scoring as it gets..

Actually he's right. You didn't come close to scoring apart from the times you almost scored.

Perfectly reasonable post by Scott.

You've lost me. Are you being serious or are you mocking him?