Discuss
Last edited by Filippo Inzaghi on Sun Aug 14, 2011 8:11 am; edited 1 time in total
luke. wrote:have*
Thank you i did not notice this errorluke. wrote:have*
I agree but some believe it is a redRoryOB94 wrote:Yellow card was enough
His dive was no worse than Barton's.Jelavic9|RFC wrote:No he shouldn't have, A yellow card was the correct decision. Gervinho deserved to be booked for diving and to be sent off for violent conduct.
SBSP wrote:His dive was no worse than Barton's.Jelavic9|RFC wrote:No he shouldn't have, A yellow card was the correct decision. Gervinho deserved to be booked for diving and to be sent off for violent conduct.
Gervinho was clipped. Everyone seems to be ignoring that.Jelavic9|RFC wrote:SBSP wrote:His dive was no worse than Barton's.Jelavic9|RFC wrote:No he shouldn't have, A yellow card was the correct decision. Gervinho deserved to be booked for diving and to be sent off for violent conduct.
But Barton was actually struck.
SBSP wrote:Gervinho was clipped. Everyone seems to be ignoring that.Jelavic9|RFC wrote:SBSP wrote:His dive was no worse than Barton's.Jelavic9|RFC wrote:No he shouldn't have, A yellow card was the correct decision. Gervinho deserved to be booked for diving and to be sent off for violent conduct.
But Barton was actually struck.
Jelavic9|RFC wrote:SBSP wrote:Gervinho was clipped. Everyone seems to be ignoring that.Jelavic9|RFC wrote:SBSP wrote:His dive was no worse than Barton's.Jelavic9|RFC wrote:No he shouldn't have, A yellow card was the correct decision. Gervinho deserved to be booked for diving and to be sent off for violent conduct.
But Barton was actually struck.
He was?
He left his foot in, kicked it towards Barton to make it look as if he was tripped.