What's the fucking point in a having a debate if one side is not allowed?
You're a fucking joke.
CollieBuddz wrote:What if one of those unborn children were to grow up and invent a cure for cancer or make cars run on water. The meaning of life is to be born, reproduce, and die.
Zzonked wrote:As RR said, people could make the same arguments for interracial couples. If they did, they would probably be infracted for racism so why is homophobia any different? In the real world people treat it in the same way as racism, so why is here different?
There are points to debate regarding marriage, but whether or not sexuality should be oppressed, kept behind closed doors, shunned and cured is not one of them, because in the 2011 world the answer is emphatically no.
[/quote]CollieBuddz wrote:Can we close this fucking thread?
Pretty pointless it staying open if you're only allowed to be for homosexuality.
I'm against it. If that makes me homophobic, then so be it. I wouldn't go that far, because there are some entertainers I like who are gay, I'll admit to being disappointed when I found out they were gay, but I still enjoy their work.
blackskar wrote:
Watching gay people kiss on TV may turn you gay. Jesus christ
JMB_94 wrote:Why did you infract him? We're just having a discussion?
Zzonked wrote:As RR said, people could make the same arguments for interracial couples. If they did, they would probably be infracted for racism so why is homophobia any different? In the real world people treat it in the same way as racism, so why is here different?
There are points to debate regarding marriage, but whether or not sexuality should be oppressed, kept behind closed doors, shunned and cured is not one of them, because in the 2011 world the answer is emphatically no.
Zzonked wrote:CollieBuddz wrote:Can we close this fucking thread?
Pretty pointless it staying open if you're only allowed to be for homosexuality.
I'm against it. If that makes me homophobic, then so be it. I wouldn't go that far, because there are some entertainers I like who are gay, I'll admit to being disappointed when I found out they were gay, but I still enjoy their work.
CollieBuddz wrote:Zzonked wrote:As RR said, people could make the same arguments for interracial couples. If they did, they would probably be infracted for racism so why is homophobia any different? In the real world people treat it in the same way as racism, so why is here different?
There are points to debate regarding marriage, but whether or not sexuality should be oppressed, kept behind closed doors, shunned and cured is not one of them, because in the 2011 world the answer is emphatically no.
It's nowhere near the fucking same. People of different races are still people. Gay people are still men shagging men, or women.
How in the fuck could you make that connection.
You're fucking bang out of order. Just because the world accepts it now doesn't mean I can't disagree with it.
I think capital punishment should be brought to the UK for CERTAIN cases. Should I be infracted for supporting murder?
I don't give a fuck if my views on homosexuality are not "right". They're equally valid and shouldn't be punished.
Mr Leiva wrote:Homophobia is just as bad as Racism.
menalawyerguy wrote:Gotta agree with colliebudz on this. I don't agree with his position on the topic of gay marriage, but I do agree with what he's saying about the infraction. You're heading down a slippery slope with this.
Sean wrote:So gay people aren't humans?