Casey Anthony Trial

So she was found not guilty on all charges except lying to police. This is like another OJ Simpson trial verdict.

It blows my mind how a person can be found not guilty for murder when it took 30 days to report a missing two year old child.

Just for people who don't know about it heres the lowdown...

-bish murdered her kid
-then went out and partied for 31 days before reporting child missing
-made up false story about the nanny running of with her, turns out there wasn't a nanny
-made up tons of other lies
-goes to trial
-child found in a swamp with duct tape over her mouth
-searches found on casey's home pv for chloroform and other incrminating terms
-traces of chloroform found in trunk of car along with dead body smell reported by witnesses
-duct tape of the same brand/style found in the anthony home
-defense argues that it could have been a drowning which is lulz worthy
-found not guilty
-everyone rages

Heres the little girl...

Basically everyone thinks she's guilty apart from the jury.

Well, some people are fucking idiot sheep crying for her blood, asking for her to be put in the chair... wow... what a fucking society we live in.

She did kill a little kid.

SBSP wrote:She did kill a little kid.

First, that is assumed, second it is disgusting for us to wish death upon a murderer, it makes us no better than them, it isn't righteous justice.

An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind, I don't think people realize this yet.

Everyone in the world might know that she's guilty but if the prosecution screws up their side of the argument, it is the duty of the jury to judge the trial based on what is presented.

The justice system doesn't always work.

If everyone's blind, it'd be much harder to commit crime.

SBSP wrote:If everyone's blind, it'd be much harder to commit crime.

What is your honest opinion, should she be murdered... ehm... executed?

Roloman4 wrote:Well, some people are fucking idiot sheep crying for her blood, asking for her to be put in the chair... wow... what a fucking society we live in.

You'd be an idiot if you think she is not guilty for murder or association of murder.

As for the death penalty, she deserves it. She murdered an innocent 2 year old. What did that kid do to deserve it? She basically got a few weeks in jail for murdering a 2 year old. How is that fucking justice? Even if she was found guilty, the most she would have gotten is life sentence in prison. Why should we pay taxes to keep a murderer in a cell for her life? Society suffers too. Plus, if a death sentence was in place, other people would think several times before committing murder. But what message are we sending out now? That you can murder someone and possibly get off for free?

ahlycotc wrote:

Roloman4 wrote:Well, some people are fucking idiot sheep crying for her blood, asking for her to be put in the chair... wow... what a fucking society we live in.

You'd be an idiot if you think she is not guilty for murder or association of murder.

As for the death penalty, she deserves it. She murdered an innocent 2 year old. What did that kid do to deserve it? She basically got a few weeks in jail for murdering a 2 year old. How is that fucking justice? Even if she was found guilty, the most she would have gotten is life sentence in prison. Why should we pay taxes to keep a murderer in a cell for her life? Society suffers too. Plus, if a death sentence was in place, other people would think several times before committing murder. But what message are we sending out now? That you can murder someone and possibly get off for free?

The death sentence is a horrid abuse of power, it's official murder.

I don't deny that she was guilty, but I prefer life in jail to murder.

Roloman4 wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:

Roloman4 wrote:Well, some people are fucking idiot sheep crying for her blood, asking for her to be put in the chair... wow... what a fucking society we live in.

You'd be an idiot if you think she is not guilty for murder or association of murder.

As for the death penalty, she deserves it. She murdered an innocent 2 year old. What did that kid do to deserve it? She basically got a few weeks in jail for murdering a 2 year old. How is that fucking justice? Even if she was found guilty, the most she would have gotten is life sentence in prison. Why should we pay taxes to keep a murderer in a cell for her life? Society suffers too. Plus, if a death sentence was in place, other people would think several times before committing murder. But what message are we sending out now? That you can murder someone and possibly get off for free?

The death sentence is a horrid abuse of power, it's official murder.

I don't deny that she was guilty, but I prefer life in jail to murder.

Why?

ahlycotc wrote:

Roloman4 wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:

Roloman4 wrote:Well, some people are fucking idiot sheep crying for her blood, asking for her to be put in the chair... wow... what a fucking society we live in.

You'd be an idiot if you think she is not guilty for murder or association of murder.

As for the death penalty, she deserves it. She murdered an innocent 2 year old. What did that kid do to deserve it? She basically got a few weeks in jail for murdering a 2 year old. How is that fucking justice? Even if she was found guilty, the most she would have gotten is life sentence in prison. Why should we pay taxes to keep a murderer in a cell for her life? Society suffers too. Plus, if a death sentence was in place, other people would think several times before committing murder. But what message are we sending out now? That you can murder someone and possibly get off for free?

The death sentence is a horrid abuse of power, it's official murder.

I don't deny that she was guilty, but I prefer life in jail to murder.

Why?

What did I just tell you, killing the killer makes us no better than the killer.

Roloman4 wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:

Roloman4 wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:

Roloman4 wrote:Well, some people are fucking idiot sheep crying for her blood, asking for her to be put in the chair... wow... what a fucking society we live in.

You'd be an idiot if you think she is not guilty for murder or association of murder.

As for the death penalty, she deserves it. She murdered an innocent 2 year old. What did that kid do to deserve it? She basically got a few weeks in jail for murdering a 2 year old. How is that fucking justice? Even if she was found guilty, the most she would have gotten is life sentence in prison. Why should we pay taxes to keep a murderer in a cell for her life? Society suffers too. Plus, if a death sentence was in place, other people would think several times before committing murder. But what message are we sending out now? That you can murder someone and possibly get off for free?

The death sentence is a horrid abuse of power, it's official murder.

I don't deny that she was guilty, but I prefer life in jail to murder.

Why?

What did I just tell you, killing the killer makes us no better than the killer.

That would be true if you murdered my relative and I went to murder you or your respective relative. But the person executing the murderer here would be a government, not some personally effected person. There is a big difference.

Do you honestly think a life sentence is an equal punishment for taking someone's life?

Roloman4 wrote:

SBSP wrote:She did kill a little kid.

First, that is assumed, second it is disgusting for us to wish death upon a murderer, it makes us no better than them, it isn't righteous justice.

An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind, I don't think people realize this yet.

An eye for an eye doesn't make the whole world blind.

If a guy pokes another guys eye out, then he goes to court and gets his poked out... it ends there. Justice.

By the way, Rolo. If a person is found guilty, I think the relatives of the murdered should be allowed to receive financial compensation instead or totally forgive the murderer. But they still have the right to allow capital punishment if found guilty.

Roloman4 wrote:

SBSP wrote:She did kill a little kid.

First, that is assumed, second it is disgusting for us to wish death upon a murderer, it makes us no better than them, it isn't righteous justice.

An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind, I don't think people realize this yet.

To build further on this saying, if a life sentence is the correct punishment, you will just have a world of dead people or people in jail. It's not any better, is it? At least with capital punishment, other people will think twice about committing murder.

ahlycotc wrote:

Roloman4 wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:

Roloman4 wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:

You'd be an idiot if you think she is not guilty for murder or association of murder.

As for the death penalty, she deserves it. She murdered an innocent 2 year old. What did that kid do to deserve it? She basically got a few weeks in jail for murdering a 2 year old. How is that fucking justice? Even if she was found guilty, the most she would have gotten is life sentence in prison. Why should we pay taxes to keep a murderer in a cell for her life? Society suffers too. Plus, if a death sentence was in place, other people would think several times before committing murder. But what message are we sending out now? That you can murder someone and possibly get off for free?

The death sentence is a horrid abuse of power, it's official murder.

I don't deny that she was guilty, but I prefer life in jail to murder.

Why?

What did I just tell you, killing the killer makes us no better than the killer.

That would be true if you murdered my relative and I went to murder you or your respective relative. But the person executing the murderer here would be a government, not some personally effected person. There is a big difference.

Do you honestly think a life sentence is an equal punishment for taking someone's life?

The government consists of people, people equal to you and me, they have no more rights and you or I.

Roloman4 wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:

Roloman4 wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:

Roloman4 wrote:

The death sentence is a horrid abuse of power, it's official murder.

I don't deny that she was guilty, but I prefer life in jail to murder.

Why?

What did I just tell you, killing the killer makes us no better than the killer.

That would be true if you murdered my relative and I went to murder you or your respective relative. But the person executing the murderer here would be a government, not some personally effected person. There is a big difference.

Do you honestly think a life sentence is an equal punishment for taking someone's life?

The government consists of people, people equal to you and me, they have no more rights and you or I.

Yes they do. That's why they're the government.

Roloman4 wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:

Roloman4 wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:

Roloman4 wrote:

The death sentence is a horrid abuse of power, it's official murder.

I don't deny that she was guilty, but I prefer life in jail to murder.

Why?

What did I just tell you, killing the killer makes us no better than the killer.

That would be true if you murdered my relative and I went to murder you or your respective relative. But the person executing the murderer here would be a government, not some personally effected person. There is a big difference.

Do you honestly think a life sentence is an equal punishment for taking someone's life?

The government consists of people, people equal to you and me, they have no more rights and you or I.

So the government doesn't have the right to tax people?

They don't have the right to kill people.

Roloman4 wrote:They don't have the right to kill people.

They do. It's called capital punishment.

SBSP wrote:

Roloman4 wrote:They don't have the right to kill people.

They do. It's called capital punishment.

The constitution protects citizens from cruel and unusual punishment, I would class murder as that, right?

Roloman4 wrote:They don't have the right to kill people.

People don't have the right to murder. A government is not treated like a person although it consists of people.

Roloman4 wrote:

SBSP wrote:

Roloman4 wrote:They don't have the right to kill people.

They do. It's called capital punishment.

The constitution protects citizens from cruel and unusual punishment, I would class murder as that, right?

Not if they killed someone. It's not cruel nor unusual punishment to kill a murderer.

Roloman4 wrote:

SBSP wrote:

Roloman4 wrote:They don't have the right to kill people.

They do. It's called capital punishment.

The constitution protects citizens from cruel and unusual punishment, I would class murder as that, right?

What's cruel about capital punishment? It's a quick and fair punishment.

SBSP wrote:

Roloman4 wrote:

SBSP wrote:

Roloman4 wrote:They don't have the right to kill people.

They do. It's called capital punishment.

The constitution protects citizens from cruel and unusual punishment, I would class murder as that, right?

Not if they killed someone. It's not cruel nor unusual punishment to kill a murderer.

Who are you to define that?

It's cruel and unusual regardless, unless you are a barbarian.

There's a reason why so many civilized nations have abolished the death penalty...


Wait, I thought you hated the US?

Roloman4 wrote:

SBSP wrote:

Roloman4 wrote:

SBSP wrote:

Roloman4 wrote:They don't have the right to kill people.

They do. It's called capital punishment.

The constitution protects citizens from cruel and unusual punishment, I would class murder as that, right?

Not if they killed someone. It's not cruel nor unusual punishment to kill a murderer.

Who are you to define that?

It's cruel and unusual regardless, unless you are a barbarian.

There's a reason why so many civilized nations have abolished the death penalty...


Wait, I thought you hated the US?

The people. Which is why we have certain states allow the death penalty. Who are you to define execution as cruel punishment?

ahlycotc wrote:

Roloman4 wrote:

SBSP wrote:

Roloman4 wrote:

SBSP wrote:They do. It's called capital punishment.

The constitution protects citizens from cruel and unusual punishment, I would class murder as that, right?

Not if they killed someone. It's not cruel nor unusual punishment to kill a murderer.

Who are you to define that?

It's cruel and unusual regardless, unless you are a barbarian.

There's a reason why so many civilized nations have abolished the death penalty...


Wait, I thought you hated the US?

The people. Which is why we have certain states allow the death penalty. Who are you to define execution as cruel punishment?

How can you honestly say depriving someone of their life, considering there is "legally" nothing afterwards, as the state and church are separate?

Roloman4 wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:

Roloman4 wrote:

SBSP wrote:

Roloman4 wrote:

The constitution protects citizens from cruel and unusual punishment, I would class murder as that, right?

Not if they killed someone. It's not cruel nor unusual punishment to kill a murderer.

Who are you to define that?

It's cruel and unusual regardless, unless you are a barbarian.

There's a reason why so many civilized nations have abolished the death penalty...


Wait, I thought you hated the US?

The people. Which is why we have certain states allow the death penalty. Who are you to define execution as cruel punishment?

How can you honestly say depriving someone of their life, considering there is "legally" nothing afterwards, as the state and church are separate?

What does this have to do with religion?