Fabregas or Iniesta?

Fine Shagger wrote:

Filippo Inzaghi wrote:*Waits for Arise to post*

I think Iniesta got ITV MOTM in the world cup final

Better than Xavi then. I dont think Xavi has ever won this award
Arise might know

Zzonked wrote:John O'Shea is the better central midfielder.

If we are talking about John O'Shea being better than Steven Gerrard then i would agree, as a moderator you should know off-topic discussions are not permitted.
Make the necessary thread if need be.

polska. wrote:

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

polska. wrote:Depends on the role. I think Iniesta is the better player but I'd rather have Fabregas on the team.

What the fuck does that mean?

Wtf else does it mean?

Iniesta > Fabregas

But I'd rather have Fabregas on a TEAM.

He's clearly asking why you wouldn't want the better player in your team

polska. wrote:

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

polska. wrote:Depends on the role. I think Iniesta is the better player but I'd rather have Fabregas on the team.

What the fuck does that mean?

Wtf else does it mean?

Iniesta > Fabregas

But I'd rather have Fabregas on a TEAM.

Why would you rather have Fabregas if Iniesta is better?

Jesus, you guys are all idiots.

For the same reason I would always rather have Xavi than Iniesta.

polska. wrote:Jesus, you guys are all idiots.

For the same reason I would always rather have Xavi than Iniesta.

Xavi is a better player.

You didn't explain, how are we supposed to know? Explain away...

I'm confused Polska

polska. wrote:Jesus, you guys are all idiots.

For the same reason I would always rather have Xavi than Iniesta.

To be fair, you're really not making much sense.

Are you saying you think Iniesta is greedy?

What the hell are you on about Polska.

Ben wrote:I'm confused Polska

He clearly can't speak the language properly, fucking Polish - job robbas!

Iniesta is more of a luxury player, typical for a player of his role.

Fabregas is a better player if you are having the whole team in mind. When Fabregas plays well, the whole team plays well.

He clearly meant he'd rather have Iniesta on fifa but Fabregas in a real team

polska. wrote:Iniesta is more of a luxury player, typical for a player of his role.

Fabregas is a better player if you are having the whole team in mind. When Fabregas plays well, the whole team plays well.

We're talking about which player is better, as an individual.

polska. wrote:Iniesta is more of a luxury player, typical for a player of his role.

Fabregas is a better player if you are having the whole team in mind. When Fabregas plays well, the whole team plays well.

That's not Iniesta's role because he's not the playmaker, Fabregas and Xavi are... Everytime Iniesta is called to supply he does it every single time. Still don't see what you're getting at tbh

JMB_94 wrote:

polska. wrote:Iniesta is more of a luxury player, typical for a player of his role.

Fabregas is a better player if you are having the whole team in mind. When Fabregas plays well, the whole team plays well.

We're talking about which player is better, as an individual.

Thus why I said Iniesta is the better player as an individual, but if I had to pick one, I would rather have Cesc.

Polska did say that Iniesta was better, JMB, his point about Fabregas was followed by a qualifying statement, he has followed the OP.

I would say Iniesta, but sure as hell not by a long shot.

If I had to pick one in my team, it would be Cesc too, but that's mainly due to his age and the fact that I think he isn't that far behind Iniesta.

But atm, as a player Iniesta is better.

polska. wrote:

JMB_94 wrote:

polska. wrote:Iniesta is more of a luxury player, typical for a player of his role.

Fabregas is a better player if you are having the whole team in mind. When Fabregas plays well, the whole team plays well.

We're talking about which player is better, as an individual.

Thus why I said Iniesta is the better player as an individual, but if I had to pick one, I would rather have Cesc.

So basically you are saying that Iniesta is the better player.

Got it.

Iniestas dribbling and creativity and abiliy to just do something out of nothing is incredible, plus he absolutely bosses the big games, his performances this season have been absolutely exceptional imo fabregas is still some way off being at iniestas level, its a shame iniesta plays for barca in a way, id like to see him be more adventurous and do what he does best more, but at barca he has a responsibility to keep possession, I think if iniesta was at arsenal instead of cesc theyd have won the league this season, dont ask me how I came to this conclusion I just did

XxBradKennedyxX wrote:Iniestas dribbling and creativity and abiliy to just do something out of nothing is incredible, plus he absolutely bosses the big games, his performances this season have been absolutely exceptional imo fabregas is still some way off being at iniestas level, its a shame iniesta plays for barca in a way, id like to see him be more adventurous and do what he does best more, but at barca he has a responsibility to keep possession, I think if iniesta was at arsenal instead of cesc theyd have won the league this season, dont ask me how I came to this conclusion I just did

This is not true

XxBradKennedyxX wrote:Iniestas dribbling and creativity and abiliy to just do something out of nothing is incredible, plus he absolutely bosses the big games, his performances this season have been absolutely exceptional imo fabregas is still some way off being at iniestas level, its a shame iniesta plays for barca in a way, id like to see him be more adventurous and do what he does best more, but at barca he has a responsibility to keep possession, I think if iniesta was at arsenal instead of cesc theyd have won the league this season, dont ask me how I came to this conclusion I just did

You sort of contradicted yourself

"at barca he has a responsibility to keep possession"

What don't Arsenal do

Finish off plays...

Which disagree's with..

"I think if iniesta was at arsenal instead of cesc theyd have won the league this season"

polska. wrote:

JMB_94 wrote:

polska. wrote:Iniesta is more of a luxury player, typical for a player of his role.

Fabregas is a better player if you are having the whole team in mind. When Fabregas plays well, the whole team plays well.

We're talking about which player is better, as an individual.

Thus why I said Iniesta is the better player as an individual, but if I had to pick one, I would rather have Cesc.

Utter shite, you are just talking in riddles. If you would rather have a particular player on your team, that player is better.

Let me rephrase RR...

I feel Fabregas would be more important to a team than Iniesta would be.

polska. wrote:Let me rephrase RR...

I feel Fabregas would be more important to a team than Iniesta would be.

So you think Fabregas is better?

They play different, to be honest Iniesta is probably better now but it's not as much as people think, 09/10 Fabregas is about the same as 10/11 Iniesta but in a different way.

I'll get told this is a shit comment etc, but Fabregas is an all round better player and I would prefer to build a team around him.

Shit comment etc Kyro.

Fine Shagger wrote:Shit comment etc Kyro.

Wonder how I knew you'd do that.

Because you are the master of predictions.

I'd rather have Iniesta than Xavi

Though if I had Messi in my team I'd take Xavi so I had quality around the pitch rather than just attacking.