What?19Jones19v wrote:SBSP_FIFA wrote:Typical Arsenal.
Dominating the game with no end product. That's typical Arsenal if ever I've seen it.
Don't get me wrong, Arsenal are my favourite English team.
What?19Jones19v wrote:SBSP_FIFA wrote:Typical Arsenal.
Funny how you had to counter attack against a team who had lost their whole spine. fp to the win though, couldn't really stop the 2nd goal but the 1st shouldn't have counted due to the foul given for Chelsea. Both Redknapp and Souness said it on SSN it was a foul on Song, it's only Chelsea fans that say otherwise lolluke. wrote:Arsenal had Chelsea scared.
That has to be one of the stupidest things said here. If we were scared our defence would have crumbled under the pressure, clearly the tactic was to counter attack, and we did, and we won.
Quote? You lot was launching the ball out for a good amount of the 2nd half, either way your team defended well. Just one questionluke. wrote:Arsenal had Chelsea scared.
That has to be one of the stupidest things said here. If we were scared our defence would have crumbled under the pressure, clearly the tactic was to counter attack, and we did, and we won.
Walcott wrote:Funny how you had to counter attack against a team who had lost their whole spine. fp to the win though, couldn't really stop the 2nd goal but the 1st shouldn't have counted due to the foul given for Chelsea. Both Redknapp and Souness said it on SSN it was a foul on Song, it's only Chelsea fans that say otherwise lolluke. wrote:Arsenal had Chelsea scared.
That has to be one of the stupidest things said here. If we were scared our defence would have crumbled under the pressure, clearly the tactic was to counter attack, and we did, and we won.
19Jones19v wrote:Quote? You lot was launching the ball out for a good amount of the 2nd half, either way your team defended well. Just one questionluke. wrote:Arsenal had Chelsea scared.
That has to be one of the stupidest things said here. If we were scared our defence would have crumbled under the pressure, clearly the tactic was to counter attack, and we did, and we won.
Where were you when you were shit?
The whole game would have been different if your first didn't count. The game wouldn't have gone exactly the same if your first wasn't given. It was an open game in the first half, second half the majority of it was Arsenal.luke. wrote:Walcott wrote:Funny how you had to counter attack against a team who had lost their whole spine. fp to the win though, couldn't really stop the 2nd goal but the 1st shouldn't have counted due to the foul given for Chelsea. Both Redknapp and Souness said it on SSN it was a foul on Song, it's only Chelsea fans that say otherwise lolluke. wrote:Arsenal had Chelsea scared.
That has to be one of the stupidest things said here. If we were scared our defence would have crumbled under the pressure, clearly the tactic was to counter attack, and we did, and we won.
Even if the 1st didn't count, still would have been 1-0. And we didn't have to Counter attack, that was the tactic, we done it last year and won 2-0, we done it this year and won 2-0.
luke. wrote:Walcott wrote:Funny how you had to counter attack against a team who had lost their whole spine. fp to the win though, couldn't really stop the 2nd goal but the 1st shouldn't have counted due to the foul given for Chelsea. Both Redknapp and Souness said it on SSN it was a foul on Song, it's only Chelsea fans that say otherwise lolluke. wrote:Arsenal had Chelsea scared.
That has to be one of the stupidest things said here. If we were scared our defence would have crumbled under the pressure, clearly the tactic was to counter attack, and we did, and we won.
Even if the 1st didn't count, still would have been 1-0. And we didn't have to Counter attack, that was the tactic, we done it last year and won 2-0, we done it this year and won 2-0.
Not being bitter was just asking a questionluke. wrote:19Jones19v wrote:Quote? You lot was launching the ball out for a good amount of the 2nd half, either way your team defended well. Just one questionluke. wrote:Arsenal had Chelsea scared.
That has to be one of the stupidest things said here. If we were scared our defence would have crumbled under the pressure, clearly the tactic was to counter attack, and we did, and we won.
Where were you when you were shit?
Wow, you really are bitter. As i've said before, I was born a stonesthrow away from SB.
And where were you when Arsenal were shit?
Walcott wrote:The whole game would have been different if your first didn't count. The game wouldn't have gone exactly the same if your first wasn't given. It was an open game in the first half, second half the majority of it was Arsenal.luke. wrote:Walcott wrote:Funny how you had to counter attack against a team who had lost their whole spine. fp to the win though, couldn't really stop the 2nd goal but the 1st shouldn't have counted due to the foul given for Chelsea. Both Redknapp and Souness said it on SSN it was a foul on Song, it's only Chelsea fans that say otherwise lolluke. wrote:Arsenal had Chelsea scared.
That has to be one of the stupidest things said here. If we were scared our defence would have crumbled under the pressure, clearly the tactic was to counter attack, and we did, and we won.
Even if the 1st didn't count, still would have been 1-0. And we didn't have to Counter attack, that was the tactic, we done it last year and won 2-0, we done it this year and won 2-0.
Took the words out my mouth.moscowmadeit3 wrote:luke. wrote:Walcott wrote:Funny how you had to counter attack against a team who had lost their whole spine. fp to the win though, couldn't really stop the 2nd goal but the 1st shouldn't have counted due to the foul given for Chelsea. Both Redknapp and Souness said it on SSN it was a foul on Song, it's only Chelsea fans that say otherwise lolluke. wrote:Arsenal had Chelsea scared.
That has to be one of the stupidest things said here. If we were scared our defence would have crumbled under the pressure, clearly the tactic was to counter attack, and we did, and we won.
Even if the 1st didn't count, still would have been 1-0. And we didn't have to Counter attack, that was the tactic, we done it last year and won 2-0, we done it this year and won 2-0.
Oh, god, I hate people who say if the first didn't count we still would have won.
Arsenal wouldn't be throwing more players forward late on for Chelsea to counter and be able to win the FK which Alex scored from.
19Jones19v wrote:Took the words out my mouth.moscowmadeit3 wrote:luke. wrote:Walcott wrote:Funny how you had to counter attack against a team who had lost their whole spine. fp to the win though, couldn't really stop the 2nd goal but the 1st shouldn't have counted due to the foul given for Chelsea. Both Redknapp and Souness said it on SSN it was a foul on Song, it's only Chelsea fans that say otherwise lolluke. wrote:Arsenal had Chelsea scared.
That has to be one of the stupidest things said here. If we were scared our defence would have crumbled under the pressure, clearly the tactic was to counter attack, and we did, and we won.
Even if the 1st didn't count, still would have been 1-0. And we didn't have to Counter attack, that was the tactic, we done it last year and won 2-0, we done it this year and won 2-0.
Oh, god, I hate people who say if the first didn't count we still would have won.
Arsenal wouldn't be throwing more players forward late on for Chelsea to counter and be able to win the FK which Alex scored from.
I hate SkySports, they were there showing the stupid replay then the next thing I heard was the crowd amping up and then I see Anelka scuff an open goal.SBSP_FIFA wrote:Anelka's miss.
We created more chances than you, lol 13 to be precise. Indeed we had the ball, and we did have you pinned back in the final 3rd for most of the second half and we easily deserved a point..luke. wrote:Walcott wrote:The whole game would have been different if your first didn't count. The game wouldn't have gone exactly the same if your first wasn't given. It was an open game in the first half, second half the majority of it was Arsenal.luke. wrote:Walcott wrote:Funny how you had to counter attack against a team who had lost their whole spine. fp to the win though, couldn't really stop the 2nd goal but the 1st shouldn't have counted due to the foul given for Chelsea. Both Redknapp and Souness said it on SSN it was a foul on Song, it's only Chelsea fans that say otherwise lolluke. wrote:Arsenal had Chelsea scared.
That has to be one of the stupidest things said here. If we were scared our defence would have crumbled under the pressure, clearly the tactic was to counter attack, and we did, and we won.
Even if the 1st didn't count, still would have been 1-0. And we didn't have to Counter attack, that was the tactic, we done it last year and won 2-0, we done it this year and won 2-0.
And how many chances did you create? Yes you had the ball, but it's useless having the ball if you didn't create anything, you had about 4 chances the whole game, Chelsea had at least 3, probably a bit more but 3 is still more then 2. Possession =/= Chances.
Walcott wrote:We created more chances than you, lol 13 to be precise. Indeed we had the ball, and we did have you pinned back in the final 3rd for most of the second half and we easily deserved a point..luke. wrote:Walcott wrote:The whole game would have been different if your first didn't count. The game wouldn't have gone exactly the same if your first wasn't given. It was an open game in the first half, second half the majority of it was Arsenal.luke. wrote:Walcott wrote:Funny how you had to counter attack against a team who had lost their whole spine. fp to the win though, couldn't really stop the 2nd goal but the 1st shouldn't have counted due to the foul given for Chelsea. Both Redknapp and Souness said it on SSN it was a foul on Song, it's only Chelsea fans that say otherwise lolluke. wrote:Arsenal had Chelsea scared.
That has to be one of the stupidest things said here. If we were scared our defence would have crumbled under the pressure, clearly the tactic was to counter attack, and we did, and we won.
Even if the 1st didn't count, still would have been 1-0. And we didn't have to Counter attack, that was the tactic, we done it last year and won 2-0, we done it this year and won 2-0.
And how many chances did you create? Yes you had the ball, but it's useless having the ball if you didn't create anything, you had about 4 chances the whole game, Chelsea had at least 3, probably a bit more but 3 is still more then 2. Possession =/= Chances.
Walcott wrote:We created more chances than you, lol 13 to be precise. Indeed we had the ball, and we did have you pinned back in the final 3rd for most of the second half and we easily deserved a point..luke. wrote:Walcott wrote:The whole game would have been different if your first didn't count. The game wouldn't have gone exactly the same if your first wasn't given. It was an open game in the first half, second half the majority of it was Arsenal.luke. wrote:Walcott wrote:Funny how you had to counter attack against a team who had lost their whole spine. fp to the win though, couldn't really stop the 2nd goal but the 1st shouldn't have counted due to the foul given for Chelsea. Both Redknapp and Souness said it on SSN it was a foul on Song, it's only Chelsea fans that say otherwise lolluke. wrote:Arsenal had Chelsea scared.
That has to be one of the stupidest things said here. If we were scared our defence would have crumbled under the pressure, clearly the tactic was to counter attack, and we did, and we won.
Even if the 1st didn't count, still would have been 1-0. And we didn't have to Counter attack, that was the tactic, we done it last year and won 2-0, we done it this year and won 2-0.
And how many chances did you create? Yes you had the ball, but it's useless having the ball if you didn't create anything, you had about 4 chances the whole game, Chelsea had at least 3, probably a bit more but 3 is still more then 2. Possession =/= Chances.
19Jones19v wrote:We deserved a point, there's no point in trying to convince Luke he's a deluded Chelsea fan which probably wasn't the case just 5 years ago.
Probably because one is slightly more believable than the other.luke. wrote:19Jones19v wrote:We deserved a point, there's no point in trying to convince Luke he's a deluded Chelsea fan which probably wasn't the case just 5 years ago.
Wow.
So you don't believe I was born practically beside SB, Why do I have to believe you've supported Arsenal your whole life. Swings both ways mate.
Sam wrote:Probably because one is slightly more believable than the other.luke. wrote:19Jones19v wrote:We deserved a point, there's no point in trying to convince Luke he's a deluded Chelsea fan which probably wasn't the case just 5 years ago.
Wow.
So you don't believe I was born practically beside SB, Why do I have to believe you've supported Arsenal your whole life. Swings both ways mate.
Sam wrote:Probably because one is slightly more believable than the other.luke. wrote:19Jones19v wrote:We deserved a point, there's no point in trying to convince Luke he's a deluded Chelsea fan which probably wasn't the case just 5 years ago.
Wow.
So you don't believe I was born practically beside SB, Why do I have to believe you've supported Arsenal your whole life. Swings both ways mate.
Yes, because I'm quite clearly angry.luke. wrote:Sam wrote:Probably because one is slightly more believable than the other.luke. wrote:19Jones19v wrote:We deserved a point, there's no point in trying to convince Luke he's a deluded Chelsea fan which probably wasn't the case just 5 years ago.
Wow.
So you don't believe I was born practically beside SB, Why do I have to believe you've supported Arsenal your whole life. Swings both ways mate.
Love the way you always try to turn it on the fan when your own club crumbles to us though. quite humorous to see you get angry over where im from and then shove it back in my face. you must be really desperate to get at me.
13 chances, says on BBC Sport?luke. wrote:Walcott wrote:We created more chances than you, lol 13 to be precise. Indeed we had the ball, and we did have you pinned back in the final 3rd for most of the second half and we easily deserved a point..luke. wrote:Walcott wrote:The whole game would have been different if your first didn't count. The game wouldn't have gone exactly the same if your first wasn't given. It was an open game in the first half, second half the majority of it was Arsenal.luke. wrote:Walcott wrote:Funny how you had to counter attack against a team who had lost their whole spine. fp to the win though, couldn't really stop the 2nd goal but the 1st shouldn't have counted due to the foul given for Chelsea. Both Redknapp and Souness said it on SSN it was a foul on Song, it's only Chelsea fans that say otherwise lolluke. wrote:Arsenal had Chelsea scared.
That has to be one of the stupidest things said here. If we were scared our defence would have crumbled under the pressure, clearly the tactic was to counter attack, and we did, and we won.
Even if the 1st didn't count, still would have been 1-0. And we didn't have to Counter attack, that was the tactic, we done it last year and won 2-0, we done it this year and won 2-0.
And how many chances did you create? Yes you had the ball, but it's useless having the ball if you didn't create anything, you had about 4 chances the whole game, Chelsea had at least 3, probably a bit more but 3 is still more then 2. Possession =/= Chances.
13 Chances? LOL. What were you watching?
Deserved a point? If you deserved a point you would have had to have broken through our defence.
Sam wrote:Yes, because I'm quite clearly angry.luke. wrote:Sam wrote:Probably because one is slightly more believable than the other.luke. wrote:19Jones19v wrote:We deserved a point, there's no point in trying to convince Luke he's a deluded Chelsea fan which probably wasn't the case just 5 years ago.
Wow.
So you don't believe I was born practically beside SB, Why do I have to believe you've supported Arsenal your whole life. Swings both ways mate.
Love the way you always try to turn it on the fan when your own club crumbles to us though. quite humorous to see you get angry over where im from and then shove it back in my face. you must be really desperate to get at me.