What?19Jones19v wrote:SBSP_FIFA wrote:Typical Arsenal.
Dominating the game with no end product. That's typical Arsenal if ever I've seen it.
Don't get me wrong, Arsenal are my favourite English team.
+17
mac
jeb4eva
blackskar
Royal
Ben
coolhead33
Tony Adams 6
Walcott
SBSP
luke.
Barton
chemicalrubber
moscowmadeit3
Kuled
Cameron.
GK01
crump
21 posters
Chelsea vs Arsenal | 4:00pm | Sky Sports 2
SBSP-
- Posts : 50010
Dominating the game with no end product. That's typical Arsenal if ever I've seen it.
Don't get me wrong, Arsenal are my favourite English team.
Walcott-
- Posts : 14547
Location : at the stewards with Lewis Hamilton.
Supports : Arsenal & Lewis Hamilton.
Funny how you had to counter attack against a team who had lost their whole spine.luke. wrote:Arsenal had Chelsea scared.
That has to be one of the stupidest things said here. If we were scared our defence would have crumbled under the pressure, clearly the tactic was to counter attack, and we did, and we won.
fp to the win though, couldn't really stop the 2nd goal but the 1st shouldn't have counted due to the foul given for Chelsea. 
Both Redknapp and Souness said it on SSN it was a foul on Song, it's only Chelsea fans that say otherwise lol
Guest- Guest
1. Alex's goal had a sense of url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TIcw8EFbNZM]deja vu[/url]. Great strike. Ex-Santista 
.
2. Drogba playing CB.
.2. Drogba playing CB.
Last edited by Rei on Mon Oct 04, 2010 4:09 am; edited 1 time in total
Guest- Guest
Quote? You lot was launching the ball out for a good amount of the 2nd half, either way your team defended well. Just one questionluke. wrote:Arsenal had Chelsea scared.
That has to be one of the stupidest things said here. If we were scared our defence would have crumbled under the pressure, clearly the tactic was to counter attack, and we did, and we won.
Where were you when you were shit?
luke.-
- Posts : 32310
Age : 29
Location : Belfast
Walcott wrote:Funny how you had to counter attack against a team who had lost their whole spine.luke. wrote:Arsenal had Chelsea scared.
That has to be one of the stupidest things said here. If we were scared our defence would have crumbled under the pressure, clearly the tactic was to counter attack, and we did, and we won.
Even if the 1st didn't count, still would have been 1-0. And we didn't have to Counter attack, that was the tactic, we done it last year and won 2-0, we done it this year and won 2-0.
luke.-
- Posts : 32310
Age : 29
Location : Belfast
19Jones19v wrote:Quote? You lot was launching the ball out for a good amount of the 2nd half, either way your team defended well. Just one questionluke. wrote:Arsenal had Chelsea scared.
That has to be one of the stupidest things said here. If we were scared our defence would have crumbled under the pressure, clearly the tactic was to counter attack, and we did, and we won.
Where were you when you were shit?
Wow, you really are bitter. As i've said before, I was born a stonesthrow away from SB.
And where were you when Arsenal were shit?
Walcott-
- Posts : 14547
Location : at the stewards with Lewis Hamilton.
Supports : Arsenal & Lewis Hamilton.
The whole game would have been different if your first didn't count. The game wouldn't have gone exactly the same if your first wasn't given. It was an open game in the first half, second half the majority of it was Arsenal.luke. wrote:Walcott wrote:Funny how you had to counter attack against a team who had lost their whole spine.luke. wrote:Arsenal had Chelsea scared.
That has to be one of the stupidest things said here. If we were scared our defence would have crumbled under the pressure, clearly the tactic was to counter attack, and we did, and we won.
Even if the 1st didn't count, still would have been 1-0. And we didn't have to Counter attack, that was the tactic, we done it last year and won 2-0, we done it this year and won 2-0.
moscowmadeit3-
- Posts : 11283
Supports : Emm-You-Eff-See
luke. wrote:Walcott wrote:Funny how you had to counter attack against a team who had lost their whole spine.luke. wrote:Arsenal had Chelsea scared.
That has to be one of the stupidest things said here. If we were scared our defence would have crumbled under the pressure, clearly the tactic was to counter attack, and we did, and we won.
Even if the 1st didn't count, still would have been 1-0. And we didn't have to Counter attack, that was the tactic, we done it last year and won 2-0, we done it this year and won 2-0.
Oh, god, I hate people who say if the first didn't count we still would have won.
Arsenal wouldn't be throwing more players forward late on for Chelsea to counter and be able to win the FK which Alex scored from.
Guest- Guest
luke. wrote:19Jones19v wrote:Quote? You lot was launching the ball out for a good amount of the 2nd half, either way your team defended well. Just one questionluke. wrote:Arsenal had Chelsea scared.
That has to be one of the stupidest things said here. If we were scared our defence would have crumbled under the pressure, clearly the tactic was to counter attack, and we did, and we won.
Where were you when you were shit?
Wow, you really are bitter. As i've said before, I was born a stonesthrow away from SB.
And where were you when Arsenal were shit?
Not being bitter was just asking a question 
I've been supporting Arsenal all my life and that won't change at all
luke.-
- Posts : 32310
Age : 29
Location : Belfast
Walcott wrote:The whole game would have been different if your first didn't count. The game wouldn't have gone exactly the same if your first wasn't given. It was an open game in the first half, second half the majority of it was Arsenal.luke. wrote:Walcott wrote:Funny how you had to counter attack against a team who had lost their whole spine.luke. wrote:Arsenal had Chelsea scared.
That has to be one of the stupidest things said here. If we were scared our defence would have crumbled under the pressure, clearly the tactic was to counter attack, and we did, and we won.
Even if the 1st didn't count, still would have been 1-0. And we didn't have to Counter attack, that was the tactic, we done it last year and won 2-0, we done it this year and won 2-0.
And how many chances did you create? Yes you had the ball, but it's useless having the ball if you didn't create anything, you had about 4 chances the whole game, Chelsea had at least 3, probably a bit more but 3 is still more then 2. Possession =/= Chances.
moscowmadeit3-
- Posts : 11283
Supports : Emm-You-Eff-See
Where were you, Where were you, Where were you when you were shit...
Basically sang at Chelsea fans, and now City.
Basically sang at Chelsea fans, and now City.
SBSP-
- Posts : 50010
Anelka's miss.
Guest- Guest
Took the words out my mouth.moscowmadeit3 wrote:luke. wrote:Walcott wrote:Funny how you had to counter attack against a team who had lost their whole spine.luke. wrote:Arsenal had Chelsea scared.
That has to be one of the stupidest things said here. If we were scared our defence would have crumbled under the pressure, clearly the tactic was to counter attack, and we did, and we won.
Even if the 1st didn't count, still would have been 1-0. And we didn't have to Counter attack, that was the tactic, we done it last year and won 2-0, we done it this year and won 2-0.
Oh, god, I hate people who say if the first didn't count we still would have won.
Arsenal wouldn't be throwing more players forward late on for Chelsea to counter and be able to win the FK which Alex scored from.
Ben-
- Posts : 11538
Age : 30
Location : Leeds
Supports : United
19Jones19v wrote:Took the words out my mouth.moscowmadeit3 wrote:luke. wrote:Walcott wrote:Funny how you had to counter attack against a team who had lost their whole spine.luke. wrote:Arsenal had Chelsea scared.
That has to be one of the stupidest things said here. If we were scared our defence would have crumbled under the pressure, clearly the tactic was to counter attack, and we did, and we won.
Even if the 1st didn't count, still would have been 1-0. And we didn't have to Counter attack, that was the tactic, we done it last year and won 2-0, we done it this year and won 2-0.
Oh, god, I hate people who say if the first didn't count we still would have won.
Arsenal wouldn't be throwing more players forward late on for Chelsea to counter and be able to win the FK which Alex scored from.
Mine too
moscowmadeit3-
- Posts : 11283
Supports : Emm-You-Eff-See
Guest- Guest
I hate SkySports, they were there showing the stupid replay then the next thing I heard was the crowd amping up and then I see Anelka scuff an open goal.SBSP_FIFA wrote:Anelka's miss.
Walcott-
- Posts : 14547
Location : at the stewards with Lewis Hamilton.
Supports : Arsenal & Lewis Hamilton.
We created more chances than you, lol 13 to be precise. Indeed we had the ball, and we did have you pinned back in the final 3rd for most of the second half and we easily deserved a point..luke. wrote:Walcott wrote:The whole game would have been different if your first didn't count. The game wouldn't have gone exactly the same if your first wasn't given. It was an open game in the first half, second half the majority of it was Arsenal.luke. wrote:Walcott wrote:Funny how you had to counter attack against a team who had lost their whole spine.luke. wrote:Arsenal had Chelsea scared.
That has to be one of the stupidest things said here. If we were scared our defence would have crumbled under the pressure, clearly the tactic was to counter attack, and we did, and we won.
Even if the 1st didn't count, still would have been 1-0. And we didn't have to Counter attack, that was the tactic, we done it last year and won 2-0, we done it this year and won 2-0.
And how many chances did you create? Yes you had the ball, but it's useless having the ball if you didn't create anything, you had about 4 chances the whole game, Chelsea had at least 3, probably a bit more but 3 is still more then 2. Possession =/= Chances.
luke.-
- Posts : 32310
Age : 29
Location : Belfast
Of course the game would be different, Chelsea would have kept attacking because we'd have needed too, but we didn't need to in the second, as our defence was capable of seeing Arsenal off. The tactic in the second half was clearly to sit back then Counter, and it worked.
So, if we didn't score the first, Chelsea wouldn't have sat back all game, and Arsenal still mightn't have scored, or Chelsea. But it's pointless arguing over as at the end of the day you were beaten and that's the end of it.
So, if we didn't score the first, Chelsea wouldn't have sat back all game, and Arsenal still mightn't have scored, or Chelsea. But it's pointless arguing over as at the end of the day you were beaten and that's the end of it.
moscowmadeit3-
- Posts : 11283
Supports : Emm-You-Eff-See
Walcott wrote:We created more chances than you, lol 13 to be precise. Indeed we had the ball, and we did have you pinned back in the final 3rd for most of the second half and we easily deserved a point..luke. wrote:Walcott wrote:The whole game would have been different if your first didn't count. The game wouldn't have gone exactly the same if your first wasn't given. It was an open game in the first half, second half the majority of it was Arsenal.luke. wrote:Walcott wrote:Funny how you had to counter attack against a team who had lost their whole spine.luke. wrote:Arsenal had Chelsea scared.
That has to be one of the stupidest things said here. If we were scared our defence would have crumbled under the pressure, clearly the tactic was to counter attack, and we did, and we won.
Even if the 1st didn't count, still would have been 1-0. And we didn't have to Counter attack, that was the tactic, we done it last year and won 2-0, we done it this year and won 2-0.
And how many chances did you create? Yes you had the ball, but it's useless having the ball if you didn't create anything, you had about 4 chances the whole game, Chelsea had at least 3, probably a bit more but 3 is still more then 2. Possession =/= Chances.
A draw would have be fair. Arsenal created more and had more possession just lacked the final ball.
Guest- Guest
We deserved a point, there's no point in trying to convince Luke he's a deluded Chelsea fan which probably wasn't the case just 5 years ago.
luke.-
- Posts : 32310
Age : 29
Location : Belfast
Walcott wrote:We created more chances than you, lol 13 to be precise. Indeed we had the ball, and we did have you pinned back in the final 3rd for most of the second half and we easily deserved a point..luke. wrote:Walcott wrote:The whole game would have been different if your first didn't count. The game wouldn't have gone exactly the same if your first wasn't given. It was an open game in the first half, second half the majority of it was Arsenal.luke. wrote:Walcott wrote:Funny how you had to counter attack against a team who had lost their whole spine.luke. wrote:Arsenal had Chelsea scared.
That has to be one of the stupidest things said here. If we were scared our defence would have crumbled under the pressure, clearly the tactic was to counter attack, and we did, and we won.
Even if the 1st didn't count, still would have been 1-0. And we didn't have to Counter attack, that was the tactic, we done it last year and won 2-0, we done it this year and won 2-0.
And how many chances did you create? Yes you had the ball, but it's useless having the ball if you didn't create anything, you had about 4 chances the whole game, Chelsea had at least 3, probably a bit more but 3 is still more then 2. Possession =/= Chances.
13 Chances? LOL. What were you watching?
Deserved a point? If you deserved a point you would have had to have broken through our defence.
luke.-
- Posts : 32310
Age : 29
Location : Belfast
19Jones19v wrote:We deserved a point, there's no point in trying to convince Luke he's a deluded Chelsea fan which probably wasn't the case just 5 years ago.
Wow.
So you don't believe I was born practically beside SB, Why do I have to believe you've supported Arsenal your whole life. Swings both ways mate.
blackskar-
- Posts : 12479
Oh fuck off Luke. Christ almighty you're annoying.
Can we get an ignore feature on here please?
Can we get an ignore feature on here please?
Sam-
- Posts : 244
Age : 28
Location : Stalking Nasri
Probably because one is slightly more believable than the other.luke. wrote:19Jones19v wrote:We deserved a point, there's no point in trying to convince Luke he's a deluded Chelsea fan which probably wasn't the case just 5 years ago.
Wow.
So you don't believe I was born practically beside SB, Why do I have to believe you've supported Arsenal your whole life. Swings both ways mate.
luke.-
- Posts : 32310
Age : 29
Location : Belfast
What, you got beat, stop whinging about it, when we get beat and i do it you tell me to get over it, time to get over it yourself. You weren't clinical enough too score goals, goals win games, Chelsea scored 2, Chelsea won. End of.
Guest- Guest
Sam wrote:Probably because one is slightly more believable than the other.luke. wrote:19Jones19v wrote:We deserved a point, there's no point in trying to convince Luke he's a deluded Chelsea fan which probably wasn't the case just 5 years ago.
Wow.
So you don't believe I was born practically beside SB, Why do I have to believe you've supported Arsenal your whole life. Swings both ways mate.
luke.-
- Posts : 32310
Age : 29
Location : Belfast
Sam wrote:Probably because one is slightly more believable than the other.luke. wrote:19Jones19v wrote:We deserved a point, there's no point in trying to convince Luke he's a deluded Chelsea fan which probably wasn't the case just 5 years ago.
Wow.
So you don't believe I was born practically beside SB, Why do I have to believe you've supported Arsenal your whole life. Swings both ways mate.
Love the way you always try to turn it on the fan when your own club crumbles to us though. quite humorous to see you get angry over where im from and then shove it back in my face. you must be really desperate to get at me.
Sam-
- Posts : 244
Age : 28
Location : Stalking Nasri
Yes, because I'm quite clearly angry.luke. wrote:Sam wrote:Probably because one is slightly more believable than the other.luke. wrote:19Jones19v wrote:We deserved a point, there's no point in trying to convince Luke he's a deluded Chelsea fan which probably wasn't the case just 5 years ago.
Wow.
So you don't believe I was born practically beside SB, Why do I have to believe you've supported Arsenal your whole life. Swings both ways mate.
Love the way you always try to turn it on the fan when your own club crumbles to us though. quite humorous to see you get angry over where im from and then shove it back in my face. you must be really desperate to get at me.
Walcott-
- Posts : 14547
Location : at the stewards with Lewis Hamilton.
Supports : Arsenal & Lewis Hamilton.
13 chances, says on BBC Sport?luke. wrote:Walcott wrote:We created more chances than you, lol 13 to be precise. Indeed we had the ball, and we did have you pinned back in the final 3rd for most of the second half and we easily deserved a point..luke. wrote:Walcott wrote:The whole game would have been different if your first didn't count. The game wouldn't have gone exactly the same if your first wasn't given. It was an open game in the first half, second half the majority of it was Arsenal.luke. wrote:Walcott wrote:Funny how you had to counter attack against a team who had lost their whole spine.luke. wrote:Arsenal had Chelsea scared.
That has to be one of the stupidest things said here. If we were scared our defence would have crumbled under the pressure, clearly the tactic was to counter attack, and we did, and we won.
Even if the 1st didn't count, still would have been 1-0. And we didn't have to Counter attack, that was the tactic, we done it last year and won 2-0, we done it this year and won 2-0.
And how many chances did you create? Yes you had the ball, but it's useless having the ball if you didn't create anything, you had about 4 chances the whole game, Chelsea had at least 3, probably a bit more but 3 is still more then 2. Possession =/= Chances.
13 Chances? LOL. What were you watching?
Deserved a point? If you deserved a point you would have had to have broken through our defence.
I can't believe your saying we didn't deserve a point tbh, you hardly beat us convincingly. We were the better team just didn't score, and thats been our problem for some time now.
Im just gonna leave it now, no point muggin you off anymore, because it's pointless when you can't even admit we didn't deserve a point..
Im proud of how we played against the Champions tbh, we could have easily come away with something without our spine. Not many teams, in the world could say that.
blackskar-
- Posts : 12479
Sam wrote:Yes, because I'm quite clearly angry.luke. wrote:Sam wrote:Probably because one is slightly more believable than the other.luke. wrote:19Jones19v wrote:We deserved a point, there's no point in trying to convince Luke he's a deluded Chelsea fan which probably wasn't the case just 5 years ago.
Wow.
So you don't believe I was born practically beside SB, Why do I have to believe you've supported Arsenal your whole life. Swings both ways mate.
Love the way you always try to turn it on the fan when your own club crumbles to us though. quite humorous to see you get angry over where im from and then shove it back in my face. you must be really desperate to get at me.
