Playmaker's Best Premier League Team - RM - Voting

Ronaldo easily, should be in the poll on his own.

I would say Adam's inclusion is far more controversial than Vidic's, Vidic has been consistently the best central defender in England for 3 straight seasons. In Adam's time, there was a dude by the name of Marcel Desailly who was a far superior individual, pity that his club team wasn't as flash even though Chelsea were decent, but not in Arsenals tier though.

See how much more exciting this is? So, shall I do a 4-1-2-1-2 formation dudes?

Why would we do a diamond?

It should be 4-4-2 or 4-3-3.

Just do a 4-4-2.

GCU wrote:I would say Adam's inclusion is far more controversial than Vidic's, Vidic has been consistently the best central defender in England for 3 straight seasons. In Adam's time, there was a dude by the name of Marcel Desailly who was a far superior individual, pity that his club team wasn't as flash even though Chelsea were decent, but not in Arsenals tier though.

He spent 22 years at one club, try showing that loyalty these days.

Doesn't matter because I know people are just voting for the worst options anyway. I think you pissed too many people off in the previous polls.

Right so do I do a defensive minded player and vice versa for centre-mids? Or jsut do a centremids vote like the centrebacks one? I reckon defensive and attacking is easier.

luke. wrote:Robben would have been there, but he didn't make 100 appearances

Did he ever play RM for you? He was a pure LM at Chelsea no?

Fine Shagger wrote:If you want to avoid a stupid vote in Striker don't include Bergkamp.

Shh.

GCU wrote:I would say Adam's inclusion is far more controversial than Vidic's, Vidic has been consistently the best central defender in England for 3 straight seasons. In Adam's time, there was a dude by the name of Marcel Desailly who was a far superior individual, pity that his club team wasn't as flash even though Chelsea were decent, but not in Arsenals tier though.

Fuck off

I'd say do a 4-4-1-1 formation. With a supporting striker. That way we can piss Jamie off.

crump wrote:

GCU wrote:I would say Adam's inclusion is far more controversial than Vidic's, Vidic has been consistently the best central defender in England for 3 straight seasons. In Adam's time, there was a dude by the name of Marcel Desailly who was a far superior individual, pity that his club team wasn't as flash even though Chelsea were decent, but not in Arsenals tier though.

He spent 22 years at one club, try showing that loyalty these days.

Giggs.

GCU wrote:I would say Adam's inclusion is far more controversial than Vidic's, Vidic has been consistently the best central defender in England for 3 straight seasons. In Adam's time, there was a dude by the name of Marcel Desailly who was a far superior individual, pity that his club team wasn't as flash even though Chelsea were decent, but not in Arsenals tier though.

stick to aussie rules.

crump wrote:

GCU wrote:I would say Adam's inclusion is far more controversial than Vidic's, Vidic has been consistently the best central defender in England for 3 straight seasons. In Adam's time, there was a dude by the name of Marcel Desailly who was a far superior individual, pity that his club team wasn't as flash even though Chelsea were decent, but not in Arsenals tier though.

He spent 22 years at one club, try showing that loyalty these days.

Steve Harper should have won goalkeeper

arsenalap11 wrote:

luke. wrote:Robben would have been there, but he didn't make 100 appearances

Did he ever play RM for you? He was a pure LM at Chelsea no?

Fine Shagger wrote:If you want to avoid a stupid vote in Striker don't include Bergkamp.

Shh.

GCU wrote:I would say Adam's inclusion is far more controversial than Vidic's, Vidic has been consistently the best central defender in England for 3 straight seasons. In Adam's time, there was a dude by the name of Marcel Desailly who was a far superior individual, pity that his club team wasn't as flash even though Chelsea were decent, but not in Arsenals tier though.

Fuck off

I'd say do a 4-4-1-1 formation. With a supporting striker. That way we can piss Jamie off.

I'm not going to get pissed off, this is a joke of a poll

crump wrote:

GCU wrote:I would say Adam's inclusion is far more controversial than Vidic's, Vidic has been consistently the best central defender in England for 3 straight seasons. In Adam's time, there was a dude by the name of Marcel Desailly who was a far superior individual, pity that his club team wasn't as flash even though Chelsea were decent, but not in Arsenals tier though.

He spent 22 years at one club, try showing that loyalty these days.

Oh, I didn't know that this was the "Playmaker premier league loyalty XI"

My mistake.

The Miz wrote:Doesn't matter because I know people are just voting for the worst options anyway. I think you pissed too many people off in the previous polls.

I pissed off no-one, if it wasn't for me been stern we would have Bramble, Kirkland, Konchesky all up there. It's hardly bad having Ljunberg in it tbh.

I find it wacky how the Team of the Deacde was carried out so maturely and this wasn't.

Doesn't matter if Robben played right or left, Ronaldo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robben.

You obviously have pissed off people if they are trying to make the worst one win...

Yeah, I really don't see why Ronaldo shouldn't win this poll.

SpiritOfShankly wrote:

GCU wrote:I would say Adam's inclusion is far more controversial than Vidic's, Vidic has been consistently the best central defender in England for 3 straight seasons. In Adam's time, there was a dude by the name of Marcel Desailly who was a far superior individual, pity that his club team wasn't as flash even though Chelsea were decent, but not in Arsenals tier though.

stick to aussie rules.

That's disappointing, I was expecting better

arsenalap11 wrote:

luke. wrote:Robben would have been there, but he didn't make 100 appearances

Did he ever play RM for you? He was a pure LM at Chelsea no?

Fine Shagger wrote:If you want to avoid a stupid vote in Striker don't include Bergkamp.

Shh.

GCU wrote:I would say Adam's inclusion is far more controversial than Vidic's, Vidic has been consistently the best central defender in England for 3 straight seasons. In Adam's time, there was a dude by the name of Marcel Desailly who was a far superior individual, pity that his club team wasn't as flash even though Chelsea were decent, but not in Arsenals tier though.

Fuck off

I'd say do a 4-4-1-1 formation. With a supporting striker. That way we can piss Jamie off.

It's hard to determine whether he was one or the other, because he was always swapping sides with Duff or Cole

The Miz wrote:You obviously have pissed off people if they are trying to make the worst one win...

Who did I piss off? I thought I was your main pisser offer.

Cristiano.

OP is sexist.

I voted other.

Fucking hell, what a shit choice. Where is McManaman? Easily better than Beckham and fucking Ljunberg, comedy gold. And it goes back to what I said in one of the other threads, it's a fucking shit competition this.

WHERE THE FUCK IS JOHN BARNES.

AND DON'T TELL ME HE WAS A LEFT WINGER BECAUSE HE WASN'T.

Dean wrote:Fucking hell, what a shit choice. Where is McManaman? Easily better than Beckham and fucking Ljunberg, comedy gold. And it goes back to what I said in one of the other threads, it's a fucking shit competition this.

No-one nominated him.


Ronaldo was better anyway.

Rafa, pipe down.

/

luke. wrote:

Dean wrote:Fucking hell, what a shit choice. Where is McManaman? Easily better than Beckham and fucking Ljunberg, comedy gold. And it goes back to what I said in one of the other threads, it's a fucking shit competition this.

No-one nominated him.


Ronaldo was better anyway.

Probably was. Still easily one of the top 3 wingers the Premier League's had to this day.

Asprilla should be the striker.

Don't care if he hasn't got 100 apps.

Ronaldo and Henry are the best players in EPL history.

They should be automatically put in the team at RM and Striker without polls.

No Fernandes?