Richard Keys - Liverpool fans were after revenge at Heysel

How strange that he had to pay £499,999 then.

It is quite strange, but House of Lords reinstates Grobbelaar's libel victory on a technicality.



Not guilty in my eyes that.

Dan wrote:It is quite strange, but House of Lords reinstates Grobbelaar's libel victory on a technicality.



Not guilty in my eyes that.

Should've gone to Specsavers.

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

Dan wrote:It is quite strange, but House of Lords reinstates Grobbelaar's libel victory on a technicality.



Not guilty in my eyes that.

Should've gone to Specsavers.

No evidence, no guilt I'm afraid.


Same with Rio and his drug taking.

Dan wrote:

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

Dan wrote:It is quite strange, but House of Lords reinstates Grobbelaar's libel victory on a technicality.



Not guilty in my eyes that.

Should've gone to Specsavers.

No evidence, no guilt I'm afraid.


Same with Rio and his drug taking.

If a national newspaper accused Rio Ferdinand of taking drugs I'm pretty sure he would win significant damages if he sued them.

Assumption there though.

Grobelaar was found by the highest court in the land to be a liar whose behaviour was undermining the integrity of football, Rio was found guilty of failing to take a drugs test by an FA Committee. It is you who is making the assumption, ie. that Ferdinand took drugs.

Not at all. The House of Lords reinstated Grobbelaars victory. Not guilty.

No evdience of Rio, until there is. Not guilty.


Simples..

You obviously have a very simple understanding of the law, which isn't surprising. The Grobelaar case was a civil case, not a criminal one, there is no 'guilty' or 'not guilty'.

ResurrectionRooney wrote:You obviously have a very simple understanding of the law, which isn't surprising. The Grobelaar case was a civil case, not a criminal one, there is no 'guilty' or 'not guilty'.

Don't study law, so obviously I don't have much knowledge of the law.

However, from the words, 'The House of Lords reinstated Grobbelaars victory' I get the opinion that the court ruled in his favour.


I thought you studied law, surely you'd have spotted this if my 'very simple understanding of the law' did?

Dan wrote:

ResurrectionRooney wrote:You obviously have a very simple understanding of the law, which isn't surprising. The Grobelaar case was a civil case, not a criminal one, there is no 'guilty' or 'not guilty'.

Don't study law, so obviously I don't have much knowledge of the law.

However, from the words, 'The House of Lords reinstated Grobbelaars victory' I get the opinion that the court ruled in his favour.


I thought you studied law, surely you'd have spotted this if my 'very simple understanding of the law' did?

You're quite a simple-minded person generally aren't you? You 'get the opinion' that the court ruled in his favour, but that is only referring to the technical decision of the court. I am fully aware that Grobbelaar won on a technicality, I'm not arguing against that, I'm arguing that Grobbelaar is dishonest, which is what the court found - read the judgement, even you should be able to understand that. No court with any legal authority has ever found Ferdinand to have done anything illegal in relation to drugs, it is not comparable

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

Dan wrote:

ResurrectionRooney wrote:You obviously have a very simple understanding of the law, which isn't surprising. The Grobelaar case was a civil case, not a criminal one, there is no 'guilty' or 'not guilty'.

Don't study law, so obviously I don't have much knowledge of the law.

However, from the words, 'The House of Lords reinstated Grobbelaars victory' I get the opinion that the court ruled in his favour.


I thought you studied law, surely you'd have spotted this if my 'very simple understanding of the law' did?

You're quite a simple-minded person generally aren't you? You 'get the opinion' that the court ruled in his favour, but that is only referring to the technical decision of the court. I am fully aware that Grobbelaar won on a technicality, I'm not arguing against that, I'm arguing that Grobbelaar is dishonest, which is what the court found - read the judgement, even you should be able to understand that. No court with any legal authority has ever found Ferdinand to have done anything illegal in relation to drugs, it is not comparable

Because I don't understand law?.

You're a funny lad in fairness.

Yeah, I'm a man of many fucking talents.

Sadly, detecting sarcasm isn't one of them..

That wasn't sarcasm, here we go again with you talking about things you don't understand. Go and look up the word sarcasm and then get back to me.

ResurrectionRooney wrote:That wasn't sarcasm, here we go again with you talking about things you don't understand. Go and look up the word sarcasm and then get back to me.

•A form of humor that is marked by mocking with irony.

I think you'll find my 'You're a funny lad in fairness.' falls into that bracket there.



Nice try though. Improvement is needed though.

It has to be witty to be sarcasm.

ResurrectionRooney wrote:It has to be witty to be sarcasm.

It's a form of wit regardless of how 'witty' you appear to find it. Usually, the recipient of the sarcastic comment finds it less funny that the 'pitcher' if you will.

But, keep trying, you'll manage to get it one day..

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

Scouser_Dave wrote:



Why don't you fuck off. That'll improve the forum

This forum would die without me. You need people like me so you can point your fucking fingers and say "That's the bad guy".

I just noticed this is off Scarface

It's a great quote.

If it wasn't revenge the killings make them Liverpool fans even more scumbags.. killing people for nothing?

Yeh its such an outrage Keys points out an obvious motive.

Filippo Inzaghi wrote:

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

This forum would die without me. You need people like me so you can point your fucking fingers and say "That's the bad guy".

I just noticed this is off Scarface

I was surprised no-one got that one at the time.

To be fair some of them are still scrambling around for power plugs on their DVD players