Think Andy Gray was biased...

This guy's a legend.

Italian commentators aren't neutrals though. They are fans.

I'd like to see Andy Gray having a mental break down like this guy.

this is what we want to see in commentators,

Eternal Witcher wrote:this is what we want to see in commentators,

you dont see the commentators though...

James ♠ wrote:

Eternal Witcher wrote:this is what we want to see in commentators,

you dont see the commentators though...

Grow up.

Fanatic wrote:

James ♠ wrote:

Eternal Witcher wrote:this is what we want to see in commentators,

you dont see the commentators though...

Grow up.

maybe im missing something if you lot are watching commentators.

Zzonked wrote:

I remember that

Still don't have a fecking clue what he says

James wrote:

Fanatic wrote:

James wrote:

Eternal Witcher wrote:this is what we want to see in commentators,

you dont see the commentators though...

Grow up.

maybe im missing something if you lot are watching commentators.

You misinterpreted what he actually meant. Actually, on second thought you're just an idiot.

no, if he said this is what we want to hear in commentating then i would understand it.


but see in commentators makes no sense.


do you want a box in the bottom corner while watching the game so you can see the commentator

James ♠ wrote:no, if he said this is what we want to hear in commentating then i would understand it.


but see in commentators makes no sense.


do you want a box in the bottom corner while watching the game so you can see the commentator

What we want to see....ie : passion, enthusiasm ect in the commentary.

but you dont see it, you hear it

James ♠ wrote:but you dont see it, you hear it

It's not meant to be literal.

James ♠ wrote:no, if he said this is what we want to hear in commentating then i would understand it.


but see in commentators makes no sense.


do you want a box in the bottom corner while watching the game so you can see the commentator

Eternal Witcher wrote:

James ♠ wrote:no, if he said this is what we want to hear in commentating then i would understand it.


but see in commentators makes no sense.


do you want a box in the bottom corner while watching the game so you can see the commentator

Don't worry. He tried to act smart and comical but he failed.

Fanatic wrote:

James ♠ wrote:but you dont see it, you hear it

It's not meant to be literal.

i want to hear you be silent

Superfan, him.

James wrote:

Fanatic wrote:

James wrote:but you dont see it, you hear it

It's not meant to be literal.

i want to hear you be silent

You failed.

Now i'm going to go out. Have fun being wrong on here again.

i didnt fail. you cant see a commentator if he isnt on the screen

James ♠ wrote:i didnt fail. you cant see a commentator if he isnt on the screen

James is right in what he's saying technically, however, had he interpretated the comment in the way the poster intended, none of this scenario would have been played out. Therefore, I announce said poster as in the wrong. Make it clearer what you are trying to put across next time.


That is all

forest spoke, i am right, you are wrong

Rastamouse wrote:James is right in what he's saying technically, however, had he interpretated the comment in the way the poster intended, none of this scenario would have been played out. Therefore, I announce said poster as in the wrong. Make it clearer what you are trying to put across next time.


That is all

I think he took the term 'see' a bit to literal, he obviously didn't mean you can see the commentators so theirs no need to act like a smart ass.

Rastamouse wrote:James is right in what he's saying technically, however, had he interpretated the comment in the way the poster intended, none of this scenario would have been played out. Therefore, I announce said poster as in the wrong. Make it clearer what you are trying to put across next time.


That is all

are you serious? Its pretty clear to anyone who has more than one brain-cell. And they are generally a minority, so why bother explaining?

Lol, Eternal Witcher is right. James is also right, but it's pathetic and pedantic.

'See' can be used in the way Eternal Witcher used it. For example, imagine you were listening to a game on the radio, and one person said to the other, "I bet Liverpool will win"

The other person could then say, "Wait and see" ... right? He's not going to say "Wait and hear" is he? That's just stupid lol.

Anyway, just proving that IMO I think Eternal Witcher was correct with his wording, but James was being overly literal and pedantic.

It's basically just poor wummery.

Trololololololololololol.

luke. wrote:Trololololololololololol.