tim cahill: good player or just a oz kevin nolan?

statistci in everton

04-05 38 game, 12 goal, 9 assist
05-06, 39 game, 8 goal, 5 assist
06-07, 21 game, 7 goal, 2 assist
07-08, 28 game, 10 goal, 5 assist
08-09, 40 game, 9 goal, 7 assist
09-10, 43 game, 10 goal, 6 assist
10-11, 17 game, 9 goal, 3 assist

what is opinions?

Good ninja.

Can header a ball. No more.

Can header assists though as well.

Comes under the category of headering a ball.

he can also elbow player to

not a player that i like at all but he know how to score goal and win header but very limited technique for sure

Better than Nolan by some distance imo.

Hardly. If anything I would say Nolan was better because he scores you more (important) goals as well as having more of a dominant presence on the field than Cahill.

I'm going to be biased here and say Cahill is a god

coolmarvin wrote:Hardly. If anything I would say Nolan was better because he scores you more (important) goals as well as having more of a dominant presence on the field than Cahill.

i think cahill hold record for most goal score in mersyside derby in history

also rememeber him score some good goals against chelsea and arsenal and inworld cup

without cahill everton would surely being in relegation zone right now he score half of their goal

I both rate and don't rate Cahill at the same time, if you get what I mean.

Cahill's just as physically imposing tbh

mauro wrote:

coolmarvin wrote:Hardly. If anything I would say Nolan was better because he scores you more (important) goals as well as having more of a dominant presence on the field than Cahill.

i think cahill hold record for most goal score in mersyside derby in history

also rememeber him score some good goals against chelsea and arsenal and inworld cup

without cahill everton would surely being in relegation zone right now he score half of their goal

Goes to show how bad Everton are these days.

Danny wrote:Cahill's just as physically imposing tbh

Didn't say Nolan was physically imposing, that's quite different to dominant presence. I meant Nolan is always makes runs, getting back to defend, he just everywhere tbh. Not to mention he's a far better finisher than most people give him credit for.

Tim-A-Roo ...

coolmarvin wrote: I meant Nolan is always makes runs, getting back to defend, he just everywhere tbh. Not to mention he's a far better finisher than most people give him credit for.

but that is same thing cahill does

coolmarvin wrote:Goes to show how bad Everton are these days.

Best squad we've had this decade, just for some reason we haven't been getting the results. We'll still finish above Bolton

I think he's quality.

everton is great team

We heard you the first time. :troll:

I fucking hate double posts.

Hitchy wrote:

coolmarvin wrote:Goes to show how bad Everton are these days.

Best squad we've had this decade, just for some reason we haven't been getting the results. We'll still finish above Bolton

This decade? It's 2010 mate, it's the only squad you've had this decade..

Danny wrote:

Hitchy wrote:

coolmarvin wrote:Goes to show how bad Everton are these days.

Best squad we've had this decade, just for some reason we haven't been getting the results. We'll still finish above Bolton

This decade? It's 2010 mate, it's the only squad you've had this decade..

You know what I meant

Jelavic18|RFC wrote:

I fucking hate double posts.

was accident

Hitchy wrote:

Danny wrote:

Hitchy wrote:

coolmarvin wrote:Goes to show how bad Everton are these days.

Best squad we've had this decade, just for some reason we haven't been getting the results. We'll still finish above Bolton

This decade? It's 2010 mate, it's the only squad you've had this decade..

You know what I meant

Indeed I did. Still wrong though

Tbh, Everton are better than Bolton, and anyone with a brain knows you always kick on in the second half if the season- much like United do.

Danny wrote:

Hitchy wrote:

coolmarvin wrote:Goes to show how bad Everton are these days.

Best squad we've had this decade, just for some reason we haven't been getting the results. We'll still finish above Bolton

This decade? It's 2010 mate, it's the only squad you've had this decade..

Technically the new decade doesn't start until 2011.

[/pedant]

I think Cahil is underrated, people just say about his heading of the ball, I think he links up play well, and when he gets it he doesn't lose the ball much, he makes nice simple passing, has good positioning and is a great player for Everton.

ayvee1 wrote:

Danny wrote:

Hitchy wrote:

coolmarvin wrote:Goes to show how bad Everton are these days.

Best squad we've had this decade, just for some reason we haven't been getting the results. We'll still finish above Bolton

This decade? It's 2010 mate, it's the only squad you've had this decade..

Technically the new decade doesn't start until 2011.

[/pedant]

Oh, so last decade started in 2001?

No. He's just a thug, like Fellaini.

Danny wrote:

ayvee1 wrote:

Danny wrote:

Hitchy wrote:

coolmarvin wrote:Goes to show how bad Everton are these days.

Best squad we've had this decade, just for some reason we haven't been getting the results. We'll still finish above Bolton

This decade? It's 2010 mate, it's the only squad you've had this decade..

Technically the new decade doesn't start until 2011.

[/pedant]

Oh, so last decade started in 2001?

Yes.

Although obviously no-one takes notice understandably.

Think of it this way, the very first year of the modern calendar would have been year 1, not 0. The a decade after that, year 11 and so on.

That's silly, the new decade starts as the other one ends, when it hit 2010, that was 10 years since it hit 2000, now we're going through the first year of the decade and coming out of it into the second year of the decade which is 2011.