Come on England!
Probably 4-3-3, but Cleverley could start behind Rooney in a 4-2-3-1.
Forest wrote:Should be a straightforward win. Brazil are shite now and are 18th in the rankings, worse than the likes of Greece and Denmark these days. I'm going for England 4-2 Brazil
Murder Alves...or at least break his legs.Danny wrote:@StanCollymore: Brazil Team v England
Cesar/Alves Luiz Dante Adriano/Paulinho Ramires/Neymar Oscar Ronaldiho/Fabiano
@talkSPORT LIVE 7:30pm KO
Couple of questions; do they not have a better keeper than Julio Cesar, how are Ronaldinho and Fabiano doing, and what has Rafael got to do to even get into the squad?
Diego Alves, Ronaldinho has been doing good apparently and be better than Daniel Alves.Danny wrote:@StanCollymore: Brazil Team v England
Cesar/Alves Luiz Dante Adriano/Paulinho Ramires/Neymar Oscar Ronaldiho/Fabiano
@talkSPORT LIVE 7:30pm KO
Couple of questions; do they not have a better keeper than Julio Cesar, how are Ronaldinho and Fabiano doing, and what has Rafael got to do to even get into the squad?
Carlos Jenkinson wrote:Cleverley
Good choice of team apart from Cleverley though
Please do explain.Carlos Jenkinson wrote:Cleverley
Good choice of team apart from Cleverley though
Fucking hell you're stupid.Carlos Jenkinson wrote:Because he's a well drilled shithouse Danny, or in other words a naturally shit footballer. I wouldn't expect someone like you'd to understand
Danny wrote:Fucking hell you're stupid.Carlos Jenkinson wrote:Because he's a well drilled shithouse Danny, or in other words a naturally shit footballer. I wouldn't expect someone like you'd to understand
Barry.Yrael wrote:Danny wrote:Fucking hell you're stupid.
No he isn't. It'd be better to play Wilshere in Cleverley's place and have someone like Carrick or Barry sitting deeper next to Gerrard.
I know it's for money you monumental moron.Carlos Jenkinson wrote:No you thick fuck, it's the fact that you asked what the purpose of fixing a match was. Which is obviously for money, they don't do it for the "lols" do they?
Danny wrote:
My point was it's hardly a match I'd think would be one to be targeted by match fixers
Danny wrote:Well seen as you'd have to follow the person I tweeted for it to do that...