Man Utd V Spurs

The-Reporter wrote:

kyro7 wrote:

The-Reporter wrote:At the end of the day Spurs were shit and their wingers are overrated cunts. I hope they die as a club.

Arsenal fan much?

Nah i support Tottenham.

You support the death of their club.

The-Reporter wrote:At the end of the day Spurs were shit and their wingers are overrated cunts. I hope they die as a club.

kyro7 wrote:

The-Reporter wrote:

kyro7 wrote:

The-Reporter wrote:At the end of the day Spurs were shit and their wingers are overrated cunts. I hope they die as a club.

Arsenal fan much?

Nah i support Tottenham.

You support the death of their club.

I support Spurs.














On cowboy boots.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPbnkuOVD-8

Bebe_Fun wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPbnkuOVD-8

That bird in your signature :doobie:

Gomes is 110% to blame.

1) There was no whistle from the referee or any indication from the assistant.
2) The ball never went out, so it can't be a goalkick. Also, Gomes didn't put the ball on the goal area line.
3) If it was a handball, what was Gomes doing taking the kick about 10 yards from the incident?

Anyone who blames Manchester United or the referee is pathetic.

EDIT: Horny Devil Post!

it should of either been

1) A Penalty
2) Free Kick for diving
3) Free Kick for Handball

but instead nothing was given so it was a goal... pathetic

He gave advantage

THFC-93 wrote:it should of either been

1) A Penalty
2) Free Kick for diving
3) Free Kick for Handball

but instead nothing was given so it was a goal... pathetic

1.

And that's my final answer.

Love the way MOTD hardly mentioned it should have been a pen

Because Nani went down easily afterwards, but if he doesn't go down it isn't a penalty.

kyro7 wrote:

THFC-93 wrote:it should of either been

1) A Penalty
2) Free Kick for diving
3) Free Kick for Handball

but instead nothing was given so it was a goal... pathetic

1.

And that's my final answer.

Would have been a penalty if he went down earlier, but decided to delay it and therefore should have been a free kick for Spurs as he handled the ball. Either way I couldn't give 2 fucks

Because it shouldnt of. Anyway this is a pointless arguement.... Manchester United fans are going to back there club/players anyway visa versa...

19Jones19v wrote:

kyro7 wrote:

THFC-93 wrote:it should of either been

1) A Penalty
2) Free Kick for diving
3) Free Kick for Handball

but instead nothing was given so it was a goal... pathetic

1.

And that's my final answer.

Would have been a penalty if he went down earlier, but decided to delay it and therefore should have been a free kick for Spurs as he handled the ball. Either way I couldn't give 2 fucks

Are you going to be playing the Fifa 11 league?

19Jones19v wrote:

kyro7 wrote:

THFC-93 wrote:it should of either been

1) A Penalty
2) Free Kick for diving
3) Free Kick for Handball

but instead nothing was given so it was a goal... pathetic

1.

And that's my final answer.

Would have been a penalty if he went down earlier, but decided to delay it and therefore should have been a free kick for Spurs as he handled the ball. Either way I couldn't give 2 fucks

Exactly, but surely the defender pulling Nani back affected him?

That's why I think it's a penalty, and justice was done.

THFC-93 wrote:

19Jones19v wrote:

kyro7 wrote:

THFC-93 wrote:it should of either been

1) A Penalty
2) Free Kick for diving
3) Free Kick for Handball

but instead nothing was given so it was a goal... pathetic

1.

And that's my final answer.

Would have been a penalty if he went down earlier, but decided to delay it and therefore should have been a free kick for Spurs as he handled the ball. Either way I couldn't give 2 fucks

Are you going to be playing the Fifa 11 league?

Yep why?

19Jones19v wrote:

THFC-93 wrote:

19Jones19v wrote:

kyro7 wrote:

THFC-93 wrote:it should of either been

1) A Penalty
2) Free Kick for diving
3) Free Kick for Handball

but instead nothing was given so it was a goal... pathetic

1.

And that's my final answer.

Would have been a penalty if he went down earlier, but decided to delay it and therefore should have been a free kick for Spurs as he handled the ball. Either way I couldn't give 2 fucks

Are you going to be playing the Fifa 11 league?

Yep why?

Just because i see you havnt made any transfers. You still got 30m left :O

kyro7 wrote:

19Jones19v wrote:

kyro7 wrote:

THFC-93 wrote:it should of either been

1) A Penalty
2) Free Kick for diving
3) Free Kick for Handball

but instead nothing was given so it was a goal... pathetic

1.

And that's my final answer.

Would have been a penalty if he went down earlier, but decided to delay it and therefore should have been a free kick for Spurs as he handled the ball. Either way I couldn't give 2 fucks

Exactly, but surely the defender pulling Nani back affected him?

That's why I think it's a penalty, and justice was done.

Yeah it certainly should have been a penalty, but Nani went down at least 2 seconds late which you won't get a penalty for that. He then handles the ball and the linesman or the referee should have spotted it, but they failed. United scored, Spurs sunk, hearts broken, it's a cruel game

THFC-93 wrote:

19Jones19v wrote:

THFC-93 wrote:

19Jones19v wrote:

kyro7 wrote:

THFC-93 wrote:it should of either been

1) A Penalty
2) Free Kick for diving
3) Free Kick for Handball

but instead nothing was given so it was a goal... pathetic

1.

And that's my final answer.

Would have been a penalty if he went down earlier, but decided to delay it and therefore should have been a free kick for Spurs as he handled the ball. Either way I couldn't give 2 fucks

Are you going to be playing the Fifa 11 league?

Yep why?

Just because i see you havnt made any transfers. You still got 30m left :O

I only had 30 Million to start off with, when can I buy players? and how?

19Jones19v wrote:

THFC-93 wrote:

19Jones19v wrote:

THFC-93 wrote:

19Jones19v wrote:

kyro7 wrote:

THFC-93 wrote:it should of either been

1) A Penalty
2) Free Kick for diving
3) Free Kick for Handball

but instead nothing was given so it was a goal... pathetic

1.

And that's my final answer.

Would have been a penalty if he went down earlier, but decided to delay it and therefore should have been a free kick for Spurs as he handled the ball. Either way I couldn't give 2 fucks

Are you going to be playing the Fifa 11 league?

Yep why?

Just because i see you havnt made any transfers. You still got 30m left :O

I only had 30 Million to start off with, when can I buy players? and how?

go here and read the transfer rules thread. and to make the transfer u just simply edit your team in fifa profiles and move the players to your club if you have enough money etc. oh yeah the deadline is tomorrow sometime.

https://real-football.forumotion.net/ps3-fifa-11-forum-league-f38/

The incident was major bullshit tbh,
obviously, I'm not going to complain about it, but I'd be livid if it was the other way around.

Thanks, already seen the page, but just confused with the money and all. All I really need is a goalkeeper and one more striker

19Jones19v wrote:Thanks, already seen the page, but just confused with the money and all. All I really need is a goalkeeper and one more striker

well if this helps you can buy players from active clubs which is clubs that human players control (i controll Hamburg) so u would have to offer me a sum of money for players etc. or you can buy players from inactive clubs which are clubs that are not in our league and not controlled by anyone for example. Fulham. If you are buying a player from an inactive team then these are the prices.

81+ £20m
76-80 £10m
71-75 £5m
0-70 £2m

THFC-93 wrote:

19Jones19v wrote:Thanks, already seen the page, but just confused with the money and all. All I really need is a goalkeeper and one more striker

well if this helps you can buy players from active clubs which is clubs that human players control (i controll Hamburg) so u would have to offer me a sum of money for players etc. or you can buy players from inactive clubs which are clubs that are not in our league and not controlled by anyone for example. Fulham. If you are buying a player from an inactive team then these are the prices.

81+ £20m
76-80 £10m
71-75 £5m
0-70 £2m

Thank you very much, I understand it now by the way what's Hamburg's first choice goalkeepers rating? over 80?

19Jones19v wrote:

THFC-93 wrote:

19Jones19v wrote:Thanks, already seen the page, but just confused with the money and all. All I really need is a goalkeeper and one more striker

well if this helps you can buy players from active clubs which is clubs that human players control (i controll Hamburg) so u would have to offer me a sum of money for players etc. or you can buy players from inactive clubs which are clubs that are not in our league and not controlled by anyone for example. Fulham. If you are buying a player from an inactive team then these are the prices.

81+ £20m
76-80 £10m
71-75 £5m
0-70 £2m

Thank you very much, I understand it now by the way what's Hamburg's first choice goalkeepers rating? over 80?

I have Rost and Drobny both 80 rated

THFC-93 wrote:it should of either been

1) A Penalty
2) Free Kick for diving
3) Free Kick for Handball

but instead nothing was given so it was a goal... pathetic

Well it wasn't a penalty because the referee didn't call it. So the referee must have thought it was either a dive, handball, or nothing. Just because someone dives or handles a ball, doesn't mean the referee must call it. There is a nice rule called "Advantage". The ball was in Gomes' hands in no time and he could have punted the ball about 15 yards further than the incident rather than give him a freekick 3 yards from the goal. The referee was right to let play go. It's not the referee's fault that Gomes put the ball down and walked back. Keep in mind that Gomes put the ball down about 10 yards from the Nani incident which doesn't make sense if he thought it should have been a foul back there.

I would like to conclude by saying your second point makes no sense whatsoever. Diving isn't punished by a freekick! A player found diving is just given a yellow card.

Are any of you missing the fact the linesman put his flag up (All be it a bit late) for the free-kick?

Mental lapse from Gomes.

Miscommunications like these seems to be happening more often nowadays.

ie. this game + Liverpool v Blackburn

GK01 wrote:Are any of you missing the fact the linesman put his flag up (All be it a bit late) for the free-kick?

From the replays I have seen, I didn't see the linesman raise his flag. But does it really matter? The players are supposed to continue play until the center referee blows his whistle.

Only 2 pts behind Spurs now