Actual ratings vs What you think they should be

Lux wrote:

Jelavić7|EFC wrote:I'm talking about getting promoted, so how much money do Watford earn in a season? We earn £1-2million from the league.

You get money from being on Sky or ESPN however many times a season.

I don't know what we make, but not a lot. We constantly have to sell our best players and we're still not making much progress towards getting rid of our debt.

We have a £15million blackhole every season that we need to fund and we still manage to win the league year in year out.

Jelavić7|EFC wrote:

Lux wrote:

You get money from being on Sky or ESPN however many times a season.

I don't know what we make, but not a lot. We constantly have to sell our best players and we're still not making much progress towards getting rid of our debt.

We have a £15million blackhole every season that we need to fund and we still manage to win the league year in year out.

You win the league because of that £15million blackhole.

Overspending when you can't afford it.

+ These rating are obviously based in playing in the SPL i.e. if we moved to the PL (not saying we will, it'll never happen) then they'd obviously go down.

Lux wrote:

Jelavić7|EFC wrote:

We have a £15million blackhole every season that we need to fund and we still manage to win the league year in year out.

You win the league because of that £15million blackhole.

Overspending when you can't afford it.

We can afford it though, they only reason we're in admin is because HMRC expect us to give them over £100million for a legal practice, it wasn't even illegal when we done it, they just decided that it was recently so they're taking us and 15 EPL clubs to court.

A players rating is supposed to be based on their ability, not league they play in.

They wouldn't go down just by moving to the Premier League....that doesn't even make sense

Ratings aren't based on averages either.....it's about every single player as an individual.

Lux wrote:A players rating is supposed to be based on their ability, not league they play in.

They wouldn't go down just by moving to the Premier League....that doesn't even make sense

Ratings aren't based on averages either.....it's about every single player as an individual.

Okay, can anyone actually contribute to the topic question?

I see the Reus love is spreading.

Anyway, Torres 84 - 80
Koscielny 81 - 83
Lewandoski 80 - 83
Hunterlaar 84 - 85

That's all I can think of atm.

Splashy wrote:I see the Reus love is spreading.

Anyway, Torres 84 - 80
Koscielny 81 - 83
Lewandoski 80 - 83
Hunterlaar 84 - 85

That's all I can think of atm.

I only found out that he was re-joining Dortmund yesterday

Next season, Gotze, Reus, Lewandowki etc

Some players from the Danish league, and what their ratings should be:

Bjelland - 75 (best CB in the Danish league)
Mikkelsen - 68-70 (really good RW, getting what's more or less his breakthrough)
Okore - 70 (used '11 to get from unknown to the national team)

Agger, Adam, Gerrard and Carroll 5*s.

Bitch, please.

Don't know what Jonny Hayes is, but should be at least an 85.

ayvee1 wrote:Don't know what Jonny Hayes is, but should be at least an 85.

What the fucks been wrong with you these past few days?

Mason_Inzaghi wrote:

What the fuck is that? You don't even know what's happened or nothing as you weren't here when I posted and I've since edited it because of a misunderstanding which I shall rectify later. Such a faggot.

I have seen Lux's posts you idiot.

Spoiler:

What exactly can you see from that?

Noticed they dropped Torres down to 84 now that's good he use to be 86 i still think he should be alot lower than 84 like late 70's or something.

Enqirue should be about an 83-84.

Kyro's post then. Are you saying that a player should be boosted because you haven't seen enough of them?

Jeff wrote:Noticed they dropped Torres down to 84 now that's good he use to be 86 i still think he should be alot lower than 84 like late 70's or something.

Nah, he's not that bad.

Remember, class is permanent

Mustangt125 wrote:Enqirue should be about an 83-84.

I'd say 83 yeah, he always gets underrated.

Jelavić7|EFC wrote:

Jeff wrote:Noticed they dropped Torres down to 84 now that's good he use to be 86 i still think he should be alot lower than 84 like late 70's or something.

Nah, he's not that bad.

Remember, class is permanent

Carroll is only rated 78 and he's been doing better than torres at the moment tho.

Jeff wrote:

Jelavić7|EFC wrote:

Nah, he's not that bad.

Remember, class is permanent

Carroll is only rated 78 and he's been doing better than torres at the moment tho.

WTF? Carroll went down to 78?

Should be 82, been great recently.

Jelavić7|EFC wrote:

Jeff wrote: Carroll is only rated 78 and he's been doing better than torres at the moment tho.

WTF? Carroll went down to 78?

Should be 82, been great recently.

Ye was playing with a mate of mine yesterday all the ratings have completey changed carroll is only 78 and skrtel is 80 should be like 82-83 imo.

Adebayor is still 82 and Defoe is like 80 I think?

Both >>>> Carroll

Jeff wrote:

Jelavić7|EFC wrote:

WTF? Carroll went down to 78?

Should be 82, been great recently.

Ye was playing with a mate of mine yesterday all the ratings have completey changed carroll is only 78 and skrtel is 80 should be like 82-83 imo.

Funny how the press can affect a players rating in a fucking football game, press say he's shite, lets drop his rating.

for west brom (imo)

Long 75 >> 78
dorrans 76 >> 73
McAuley 68 >> 72
Jones 68 >> 71
Morrison 71 >> 77

Well, in fairness, he has been pretty shit.

Jelavić7|EFC wrote:

Jeff wrote:Ye was playing with a mate of mine yesterday all the ratings have completey changed carroll is only 78 and skrtel is 80 should be like 82-83 imo.

Funny how the press can affect a players rating in a fucking football game, press say he's shite, lets drop his rating.

but he is shite a few half decent games doesnt mean he should be an 82