Actual ratings vs What you think they should be

I'll redo them later based on overall's.

Lux wrote:

An average of around 73-75, why's that funny?

+ If I added the youths, it'd be an average of like 68-70.

Jelavić7|EFC wrote:

Lux wrote:

An average of around 73-75, why's that funny?

Because it's not realistic?

Lux wrote:

Jelavić7|EFC wrote:

An average of around 73-75, why's that funny?

Because it's not realistic?

+ If I added the youths, it'd be an average of like 68-70.

Quite a number of players could play in the PL.

You can't boost ratings if you haven't seen enough of them.

Celik 68 (72) Not seen enough of him
McKay 68 (71) Not enough first team football
Bedoya 68 (70) Not enough first team football

Jordi wrote:You can't boost ratings if you haven't seen enough of them.

3 games for us, but I've watched him playing for GAIS/Sweden.

Now that Jelavic is gone, probably one or two if they're lucky, though they wouldn't be first team players even at the lowest teams.

kyro7 wrote:Celik 68 (72) Not seen enough of him
McKay 68 (71) Not enough first team football
Bedoya 68 (70) Not enough first team football

They're not that bad though.

McKay - Australian POTY
Bedoya - Keeping Landon Donavon out of the USA team
Celik - As mentioned watched him before he joined us.

Jelavić7|EFC wrote:

Jordi wrote:You can't boost ratings if you haven't seen enough of them.

3 games for us, but I've watched him playing for GAIS/Sweden.

That would be like me saying, "I haven't seen much of TADANARI, so he should be 72.

Haven't seen much of Naismith, should be 45.

Lux wrote:Now that Jelavic is gone, probably one or two if they're lucky, though they wouldn't be first team players even at the lowest teams.

McGregor
Naismith
Davis
Bocanegra
Aluko
Papac
Wallace
Edu
Whittaker
Lafferty (possibly)

kyro7 wrote:Haven't seen much of Naismith, should be 45.

Evidently mad admin is evidently mad?

Anyway, this is for opinion. Why don't you all post your about your own team, you can't talk about overrating players, Rooney at 90?

Ness 68 (72) Brightest young CM in the SPL (hampered by injuries)




That makes him better than Cork, Schneiderlin, Hammond and Chaplow.

Rangers would be lucky to finish in the top 6 of the Championship

Jordi wrote:Ness 68 (72) Brightest young CM in the SPL (hampered by injuries)




That makes him better than Cork, Schneiderlin, Hammond and Chaplow.

No, they should go up as well.

Lux wrote:Rangers would be lucky to finish in the top 6 of the Championship

After being £90million/£100million richer a season?

Jordi wrote:

Jelavić7|EFC wrote:

3 games for us, but I've watched him playing for GAIS/Sweden.

That would be like me saying, "I haven't seen much of TADANARI, so he should be 72.

So you've never watched him play for Japan?

Championship clubs don't get £90m a season.

And no, our players shouldn't have to be boosted to accomodate other ratings, like FM, it should be the other way round, ours are fairly accurate.

Jelavić7|EFC wrote:

Jordi wrote:That would be like me saying, "I haven't seen much of TADANARI, so he should be 72.

So you've never watched him play for Japan?

No. I hadn't heard of him until January.

Our average rating would be 68-69, I am trying to base them on averaging out. How is that biased?

Jelavić7|EFC wrote:

Lux wrote:Rangers would be lucky to finish in the top 6 of the Championship

After being £90million/£100million richer a season?

Where the hell did that come from?

Watford get a lot less money than Rangers.

Jordi wrote:Championship clubs don't get £90m a season.

And no, our players shouldn't have to be boosted to accomodate other ratings, like FM, it should be the other way round, ours are fairly accurate.

Jelavić7|EFC wrote:

So you've never watched him play for Japan?

No. I hadn't heard of him until January.

No, PL teams do. We get less than £1million for winning the SPL. You get like £90million for winning the Championship

i.e. money from sponsorship, TV rights in the PL.

No you don't

That figure includes next season's TV Rights, sponsorship and Premier League prize money..

Lux wrote:

Jelavić7|EFC wrote:

After being £90million/£100million richer a season?

Where the hell did that come from?

Watford get a lot less money than Rangers.

I'm talking about getting promoted, so how much money do Watford earn in a season? We earn £1-2million from the league.

Jordi wrote:No you don't

That figure includes next season's TV Rights, sponsorship and Premier League prize money..

That's what I'm talking about.

Sponsorship when you get into the PL.

Ratings aren't final.

Thomas Broich - is 72 should be 99.

Jelavić7|EFC wrote:I'm talking about getting promoted, so how much money do Watford earn in a season? We earn £1-2million from the league.

You get money from being on Sky or ESPN however many times a season.

I don't know what we make, but not a lot. We constantly have to sell our best players and we're still not making much progress towards getting rid of our debt.

2008 FL prize money:



Prize Money
Ch Winners £50,000
Ch Runners Up £25,000

L1 Winners £25,000
L1 Runners Up £10,000

L2 Winners £25,000
L2 Runners Up £10,000
L2 Third Place £5,000

You get £40m over the course of the next season and something like £7m minimum prize money the next season.