Emma wrote:ricky//habana wrote:beat City without him, clearly they are a two man team then
What will happen when Gerrard gets injured like we all know he will.
Since when is Gerrard Suarez? You said we are a one man team.
Emma wrote:ricky//habana wrote:beat City without him, clearly they are a two man team then
What will happen when Gerrard gets injured like we all know he will.
Emma wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:5 goals this season from the most shots in the League this season, he's a vastly overrated player.
Agreed, Liverpool can not function without him having to play him in cup games when most "big" clubs play there lesser players and still manage to win.
Splashy wrote:What a pointless thread, most teams have a player they rely on.
Obvious troll is obvious.
Scott wrote:Emma, you keep mentioning cup games. We beat Chelsea 2-0 without him, then beat Man City 1-0 without him. We also beat Oldham 5-1 without him, in the FA Cup.
So, you're basically wrong.
Emma wrote:Splashy wrote:What a pointless thread, most teams have a player they rely on.
Obvious troll is obvious.
Liverpool rely mainly on just one player they cannot function the same without Suarez.
Emma wrote:Scott wrote:Emma, you keep mentioning cup games. We beat Chelsea 2-0 without him, then beat Man City 1-0 without him. We also beat Oldham 5-1 without him, in the FA Cup.
So, you're basically wrong.
Hardly, you will not beat City in the second leg, Oldham's hardly a big club is it?
Emma wrote:Scott wrote:Emma, you keep mentioning cup games. We beat Chelsea 2-0 without him, then beat Man City 1-0 without him. We also beat Oldham 5-1 without him, in the FA Cup.
So, you're basically wrong.
Hardly, you will not beat City in the second leg, Oldham's hardly a big club is it?
Emma wrote:Splashy wrote:What a pointless thread, most teams have a player they rely on.
Obvious troll is obvious.
Liverpool rely mainly on just one player they cannot function the same without Suarez.
Emma wrote:Scott wrote:Emma, you keep mentioning cup games. We beat Chelsea 2-0 without him, then beat Man City 1-0 without him. We also beat Oldham 5-1 without him, in the FA Cup.
So, you're basically wrong.
Hardly, you will not beat City in the second leg, Oldham's hardly a big club is it?
Emma wrote:Scott wrote:
What the fuck?
Liverpool is not a big club anymore. No one sees them as a real threat anymore, Tottenham hasn't spent half the money Liverpool has and teams fear them much more and let's face it there a better side.
Toulalan wrote:Emma wrote:
Liverpool is not a big club anymore. No one sees them as a real threat anymore, Tottenham hasn't spent half the money Liverpool has and teams fear them much more and let's face it there a better side.
Coming from the Chelsea fan
Toulalan wrote:Emma wrote:
Liverpool is not a big club anymore. No one sees them as a real threat anymore, Tottenham hasn't spent half the money Liverpool has and teams fear them much more and let's face it there a better side.
Coming from the Chelsea fan
Mason_Inzaghi wrote:Who is that girl in your signature Leo?
Mason_Inzaghi wrote:Who is that girl in your signature Leo?
Emma wrote:Like every key player for them they cannot function without them.
Fernando Torres was mentally and physically drained under the Benitez era and Kenny Dalglish had no idea how to play him.
This is what has happened with Suarez, you have relied to much on him even in cup games against lower league teams, the team is paying the penalty for relying on just one player.
Think he's past it, about as much as the man on your sig.Chris wrote:Liverpool need this man.
Alan wrote:Think he's past it, about as much as the man on your sig.Chris wrote:Liverpool need this man.
|
|