Dan wrote:kyro7 wrote:Why man, there's so many holes in their report, your friend lawyer said he'd love that report.
How the fuck should I know? Dickhead.
Calm down Daniel. +10
LiamB_14
Lux
dena
moscowmadeit3
Mouse
ResurrectionRooney
samiz
Kuled
Cadbury
VivaRonaldoLAD
14 posters
Liverpool wont appeal Suarez ban.
Guest- Guest
Calm down Daniel. 
Lux-
- Posts : 9892
Age : 32
Location : North West London
Supports : Watford FC
ResurrectionRooney wrote:If it is obvious that he is innocent, why wouldn't the second commission overturn the first one's verdict? Why wouldn't CoAfS or the Civil Courts if it got that far?
It doesn't have to be obvious that he's innocent, it has to be obvious that he's guilty.
Very different things.
Dion_Asprilla-
- Posts : 6
Cam wrote:Dion_Asprilla wrote:Funny how all the Liverpool fans were saying "it will get appealed and the ban reduced".
Neither happened.
Guest- Guest
kyro7 wrote:Dan wrote:
How the fuck should I know? Dickhead.
Don't be a cunt then.
Guest- Guest
Sorry.Dan wrote:kyro7 wrote:
Don't be a cunt then.
Guest- Guest
kyro7 wrote:Dan wrote:
How the fuck should I know? Dickhead.
Fuck off Kyro. Do one.
Guest- Guest
I like Kyro.
Guest- Guest
Jordo wrote:I like Kyro.
I don't.
ResurrectionRooney-
- Posts : 17681
Supports : United
Lux wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:It would obviously be a different body you thick shit.
Lol, nothing is obvious with the FA.
No evidence can be added, and I can't see a new body having the balls to change the verdict even if they did think Suarez is not guilty/there is not enough evidence.
They are publicly named are they not? They would all be branded racists.
It is completely obvious.
There doesn't need to be any extra evidence if there are procedural errors in the trial, which is what Liverpool and its fans have been arguing.
Why would they be branded as racists? All they would have to do would be to explain why there is not enough evidence for Suarez to be punished. It is an absolute nonsense.
Liverpool FC know Suarez is bang to rights, and this 'We are doing it for the good of English football' is just a desperate attempt to save face. The best way to fight racism would be so sack Dalglish and sack Suarez for gross misconduct before suing him for his transfer fee. They won't do that though, because that's not in their interest.
Guest- Guest
Kyro just craves attention, hence why he copied Chris' misc talk.
not serious
Guest- Guest
Fuck off AND do one, I'm impressed.Eternal Witcher wrote:kyro7 wrote:
Fuck off Kyro. Do one.
Cam wrote:Jordo wrote:I like Kyro.
I don't.
Agreed.Eternal Witcher wrote:Kyro just craves attention, hence why he copied Chris' misc talk.not serious
Kuled-
- Posts : 55235
Age : 28
Liverpool fans are so sensitive.
El Jefe-
- Formerly known as : Jay
Posts : 10657
Location : In the hall, already, on the wall, already
Supports : Pixie Lott's Legs
FUCK OFF YOU CUNT!!Kuled wrote:Liverpool fans are so sensitive.
Lux-
- Posts : 9892
Age : 32
Location : North West London
Supports : Watford FC
ResurrectionRooney wrote:It is completely obvious.
There doesn't need to be any extra evidence if there are procedural errors in the trial, which is what Liverpool and its fans have been arguing.
Why would they be branded as racists? All they would have to do would be to explain why there is not enough evidence for Suarez to be punished. It is an absolute nonsense.
Liverpool are being accused of allowing and supporting racism. So an independent body who believes that Suarez should not be charged is probably going to receive the same treatment, albeit not as publicly but it could ruin their careers and lives.
There weren't particularly any procedural errors.....it's more that the FA's rules and the wording almost forced the Independent Commission to rule against Suarez. They are ruling based on the rules of the FA, and the civil case rules which mean that someone can be found guilty based on "probability" rather than proof.
The only way an appeal would work, is if the whole structure of the system was changed to be fair, just and common sensual.
ResurrectionRooney wrote:
Liverpool FC know Suarez is bang to rights, and this 'We are doing it for the good of English football' is just a desperate attempt to save face. The best way to fight racism would be so sack Dalglish and sack Suarez for gross misconduct before suing him for his transfer fee. They won't do that though, because that's not in their interest.
You would actually need evidence to have Suarez sacked.
Mutu is still fighting his case isn't he?...and he was actually proven guilty years ago. Good luck there....
If the FA made Suarez or Dalglish lose their jobs they would probably lose millions in court (the FA)
Last edited by Lux on Wed Jan 04, 2012 6:41 am; edited 2 times in total
Guest- Guest
I think Kyro's still feeling the effects of the Blackburn game. Poor soul.
Guest- Guest
Not at all, the Sunderland game made up for it and I feel completely fine.Scott MacDougall wrote:I think Kyro's still feeling the effects of the Blackburn game. Poor soul.
Kuled-
- Posts : 55235
Age : 28
..The reception Suarez will get at Old Trafford 
Guest- Guest
Kuled wrote:..The reception Suarez will get at Old Trafford
The reaction if he scores
Guest- Guest
He'll probably rip us to shreds.Kuled wrote:..The reception Suarez will get at Old Trafford
Kuled-
- Posts : 55235
Age : 28
And we'll still win.kyro7 wrote:He'll probably rip us to shreds.Kuled wrote:..The reception Suarez will get at Old Trafford
ResurrectionRooney-
- Posts : 17681
Supports : United
Lux wrote:Liverpool are being accused of allowing and supporting racism. So an independent body who believes that Suarez should not be charged is probably going to receive the same treatment, albeit not as publicly but it could ruin their careers and lives.
There weren't particularly any procedural errors.....it's more that the FA's rules and the wording almost forced the Independent Commission to rule against Suarez. They are ruling based on the rules of the FA, and the civil case rules which mean that someone can be found guilty based on "probability" rather than proof.
The only way an appeal would work, is if the whole structure of the system was changed to be fair, just and common sensual.
Liverpool are being accused of that because they're supporting a guy who has been proven guilty. A second panel would have the authority to rule on such a case, unlikely Liverpool, and would not be biased, unlike Liverpool. It wouldn't ruin their careers at all.
It's perfectly normal to use civil case rules, why on earth would you use any other rules? The system is perfectly fair, just and common sensual. Two people come with two stories about what happened, and the Commission decides which one is true, it chooses based on which one is most likely to be true. It's much more fair than innocent until proven guilty, which weights the system severely in favour of the suspect.
ResurrectionRooney wrote:
Liverpool FC know Suarez is bang to rights, and this 'We are doing it for the good of English football' is just a desperate attempt to save face. The best way to fight racism would be so sack Dalglish and sack Suarez for gross misconduct before suing him for his transfer fee. They won't do that though, because that's not in their interest.
You would actually need evidence to have Suarez sacked.
Mutu is still fighting his case isn't he?...and he was actually proven guilty years ago. Good luck there....
If the FA made Suarez or Dalglish lose their jobs they would probably lose millions in court (the FA)
There is plenty of evidence, they would only have to prove it in a civil case.
I can see that you're a legal expert, so I'll take your word for that last bit.
Ben-
- Posts : 11538
Age : 30
Location : Leeds
Supports : United
kyro7 wrote:Why man, there's so many holes in their report, your friend lawyer said he'd love that report.Dan wrote:
Why? The likeliest outcome is an increased ban.
Make of that what you will.
Guest- Guest
You can fuck off as well.
Guest- Guest
kyro7 wrote:Not at all, the Sunderland game made up for it and I feel completely fine.Scott MacDougall wrote:I think Kyro's still feeling the effects of the Blackburn game. Poor soul.
How is having just one eye feel completely fine?
Guest- Guest
fuck off do one and get lostEternal Witcher wrote:kyro7 wrote:Not at all, the Sunderland game made up for it and I feel completely fine.
How is having just one eye feel completely fine?
Guest- Guest
kyro7 wrote:fuck off do one and get lostEternal Witcher wrote:
How is having just one eye feel completely fine?
Laurencio-
- Posts : 8730
Age : 36
Location : La Paz, Bolivia
Supports : Rosenborg, ManUtd
I like how they claim they have chosen not to appeal 
As if they had much of a choice, that case was more or less appeal proof.
As if they had much of a choice, that case was more or less appeal proof.
Guest- Guest
Laurencio wrote:I like how they claim they have chosen not to appeal
Laurencio-
- Posts : 8730
Age : 36
Location : La Paz, Bolivia
Supports : Rosenborg, ManUtd
Dan wrote:Laurencio wrote:I like how they claim they have chosen not to appeal
Dan, several legal experts have noted that there are very limited options for an appeal, and the majority of which would probably not result in a beneficial verdict for Suarez or Liverpool. They had no choice but to drop it, I understand that they spin it like this though, that's pretty much the smartest thing to do at this point.
