Dan wrote:Eternal Witcher wrote:
Strong sense of injustice we can't do anything about. But that's life. Eight games isn't the end of the world, we've had Torres out quite often.
Time for everyone to get behind Carroll. Could be the making of him this.
ResurrectionRooney wrote:Bastards, the real reason they have done this is to try and harm United's title challenge. Why else would they release a statement protesting Suarez's innocence and then not appealing?
Lux wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:Bastards, the real reason they have done this is to try and harm United's title challenge. Why else would they release a statement protesting Suarez's innocence and then not appealing?
Because despite what they believe an appeal will not change anything.
They are taking the higher ground by letting the case slide as people are starting to believe that Liverpool are racist for supporting a player who has not been proven guilty.
Viva Ronaldo 7 wrote:So depsite knowing Suarez isnt racist, they arent gonna appeal. What sort of message does that give to Suarez?
ResurrectionRooney wrote:Honestly, Liverpool have descended so so low, it wouldn't surprise me if they completely rolled over tonight and we saw a few more assists from Gerrard for opposition strikers playing for United's title rivals.
Because the way you were acting you'd think Liverpool had full support and would appeal, it's like they made a big fuss for fucking nothing.Scott MacDougall wrote:We can't win.
We appeal, everyone calls us disgusting.
We accept the ban. Everyone still finds a way of insulting us.
ResurrectionRooney wrote:Ah right, so he's innocent, the report is full of holes, and it's obviously one man's word against another, but rather than completely destroy it on appeal, Liverpool have decided to let their player suffer an 8 game ban even though he's totally innocent, all for the good of the game.
What happened to sticking by your own?
Scott MacDougall wrote:We can't win.
We appeal, everyone calls us disgusting.
We accept the ban. Everyone still finds a way of insulting us.
Dan wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:Ah right, so he's innocent, the report is full of holes, and it's obviously one man's word against another, but rather than completely destroy it on appeal, Liverpool have decided to let their player suffer an 8 game ban even though he's totally innocent, all for the good of the game.
What happened to sticking by your own?
So, what do you think the chances of a successful appeal is?
Considering that the FA are unlikely to change their verdict and further increase the ban, I'd say we've made the correct choice.
You shouldn't have made a statement in the first place then.Scott MacDougall wrote:We can't win.
We appeal, everyone calls us disgusting.
We accept the ban. Everyone still finds a way of insulting us.
ResurrectionRooney wrote:Dan wrote:
So, what do you think the chances of a successful appeal is?
Considering that the FA are unlikely to change their verdict and further increase the ban, I'd say we've made the correct choice.
It WASN'T THE F.A.'S VERDICT. It was the Independent Commission. Assuming that commission was in Ferguson's pocket or whatever, and behaved incorrectly, then the commission that heard the second case would overturn it.
Hello everyone, first of all I would like to thank greatly the support I have received these past few weeks. My family, friends, co-workers of selection and all its technical staff and of course, to the Liverpool (workers, technical and staff, managers, colleagues and anyone who is part of the daily life of this great club), and of course to all the fans who have not left that I feel only a single second. These days I've felt more than ever the significance: You never walk alone.
As many of you know I was born into a humble family in a worker suburb of a small country. But I was born and grew up from the values of respect, education, and sacrifice. From my family, going through the first club where I started to play until my jump to Europe in the Netherlands, have instilled me values that have marked the person I am today. Never, I repeat never, I have had a racial problem with any partner, or person of colour or race different from mine. Ever.
I am very angry at what has been said are weeks on me, all of which are very far from reality. But above all by the helplessness felt by not doing anything and be accused of something that I did, or would never do. In my country, black, is an expression we use commonly and symbolizing no lack of respect for and even less racism. What has been said from this is completely false.
I will comply the sanction with the resignation of someone who hasn't done anything and it feels extremely angered by what has happened. Sorry for the fans and colleagues that I will not be able to help in this next month. It will be very hard.
The only thing I hope now is to go to the stadium and do what I like best again, that is, to play football again.
Thank you very much everyone, YNWA Luis Alberto Suárez.
Kuled wrote:You shouldn't have made a statement in the first place then.Scott MacDougall wrote:We can't win.
We appeal, everyone calls us disgusting.
We accept the ban. Everyone still finds a way of insulting us.
ResurrectionRooney wrote:Ah right, so he's innocent, the report is full of holes, and it's obviously one man's word against another, but rather than completely destroy it on appeal, Liverpool have decided to let their player suffer an 8 game ban even though he's totally innocent, all for the good of the game.
What happened to sticking by your own?
If it is obvious that he is innocent, why wouldn't the second commission overturn the first one's verdict? Why wouldn't CoAfS or the Civil Courts if it got that far?Dan wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:
It WASN'T THE F.A.'S VERDICT. It was the Independent Commission. Assuming that commission was in Ferguson's pocket or whatever, and behaved incorrectly, then the commission that heard the second case would overturn it.
You know exactly what I mean. Don't try and avoid the question like you have done on this topic so many times already.
Lux wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:Ah right, so he's innocent, the report is full of holes, and it's obviously one man's word against another, but rather than completely destroy it on appeal, Liverpool have decided to let their player suffer an 8 game ban even though he's totally innocent, all for the good of the game.
What happened to sticking by your own?
Who will do the appeal? The same Independent Commission who based their judgement on no evidence?
There is no evidence to add, everything has been laid out and they have made their decision. It might not be the right decision, but an appeal isn't going to change anything..unless they are deciding by flipping a coin? With the evidence (or lack of it) at hand that is probably what they did.
Then you should appeal.Dan wrote:Kuled wrote:You shouldn't have made a statement in the first place then.
Fuck off. We believe our player is innocent and no cunt will tell us we can't express that.
Kuled wrote:Then you should appeal.Dan wrote:
Fuck off. We believe our player is innocent and no cunt will tell us we can't express that.
Why man, there's so many holes in their report, your friend lawyer said he'd love that report.Dan wrote:Kuled wrote:Then you should appeal.
Why? The likeliest outcome is an increased ban.
Dion_Asprilla wrote:Funny how all the Liverpool fans were saying "it will get appealed and the ban reduced".
Neither happened.
ResurrectionRooney wrote:It would obviously be a different body you thick shit.
kyro7 wrote:Why man, there's so many holes in their report, your friend lawyer said he'd love that report.Dan wrote:
Why? The likeliest outcome is an increased ban.
kyro7 wrote:Why man, there's so many holes in their report, your friend lawyer said he'd love that report.Dan wrote:
Why? The likeliest outcome is an increased ban.
|
|
|
