Suarez banned for eight games.

Big_Lad_Taylor wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:

Like?

Hair color, any aesthetic condition really. I am asking not stating it must be said..

ResurrectionRooney wrote:The way that Dalglish and Liverpool have conducted themselves has been absolutely shameful.

xPeterLFC95 wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:

Like?

Bellamy telling the ref to "f off."

ResurrectionRooney wrote:The way that Dalglish and Liverpool have conducted themselves has been absolutely shameful.

ahlycotc wrote:

xPeterLFC95 wrote:Bellamy telling the ref to "f off."

Because telling someone to fuck off isn't tied to the color of their skin, their race, or their religion. In that case, it was mostly likely because the referee made a decision that he didn't agree with.

Forest wrote:Suarez out of my Dream Team. Van Persie in.


Evra is the boy who cried nigga.

Snoopy wrote:The boy who cried ice cream what a disgrace, he called a black man a black man!?!? Srs, It's fucking shit.

Dean wrote:The boy who cried nigga.

French twat. Hope Suarez did abuse him now. Grass.

Big_Lad_Taylor wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:

Like?

Hair color, any aesthetic condition really. I am asking not stating it must be said..

ricky//habana wrote:

Big_Lad_Taylor wrote:
Hair color, any aesthetic condition really. I am asking not stating it must be said..

Google it. this stupid argument has been made countless times.

Dean wrote:What a great statement from the club. Made up over it. It's quite clear the FA were gunna' charge Suarez, regardless. It's to make an example. And as Liverpool said, were the fuck is the evidence? Evra's word? The whole thing stinks, the lot of it.

moscowmadeit3 wrote:

ResurrectionRooney wrote:The way that Dalglish and Liverpool have conducted themselves has been absolutely shameful.

So true. They've ran their mouths of to the media about it and their staff have on twitter. Does it really surprise you though, RR?

At least we respected the FA and remained silent on the matter and let them deal with it. Liverpool have ran stories about Evra having a track record of this, which is truly disgusting. Was there an apology? No.

xPeterLFC95 wrote:My statement would have been:

We are disappointed with the outcome, will read the reasoning and evidence behind the ruling, and reserve our right to appeal if we deem appropriate.


No petty jibes, irrelevant accusations, and we save face in front of the FA.

ahlycotc wrote:

Big_Lad_Taylor wrote:
Hair color, any aesthetic condition really. I am asking not stating it must be said..

I think abusing someone for their hair color or aesthetic condition is just as bad. The reason it's not as bad is because abusing people for their skin color has a much worse history.

Dean wrote:What a great statement from the club. Made up over it. It's quite clear the FA were gunna' charge Suarez, regardless. It's to make an example. And as Liverpool said, were the fuck is the evidence? Evra's word? The whole thing stinks, the lot of it.

moscowmadeit3 wrote:

ResurrectionRooney wrote:The way that Dalglish and Liverpool have conducted themselves has been absolutely shameful.

So true. They've ran their mouths of to the media about it and their staff have on twitter. Does it really surprise you though, RR?

At least we respected the FA and remained silent on the matter and let them deal with it. Liverpool have ran stories about Evra having a track record of this, which is truly disgusting. Was there an apology? No.

Dean wrote:What a great statement from the club. Made up over it. It's quite clear the FA were gunna' charge Suarez, regardless. It's to make an example. And as Liverpool said, were the fuck is the evidence? Evra's word? The whole thing stinks, the lot of it.

Liverpool FC Statement:

Liverpool Football Club is very surprised and disappointed with the decision of the Football Association Commission to find Luis Suarez guilty of the charges against him.

We look forward to the publication of the Commission's Judgment. We will study the detailed reasons of the Commission once they become available, but reserve our right to appeal or take any other course of action we feel appropriate with regards to this situation.

We find it extraordinary that Luis can be found guilty on the word of Patrice Evra alone when no-one else on the field of play - including Evra's own Manchester United teammates and all the match officials - heard the alleged conversation between the two players in a crowded Kop goalmouth while a corner kick was about to be taken.

The Club takes extremely seriously the fight against all forms of discrimination and has a long and successful track record in work relating to anti-racist activity and social inclusion. We remain committed to this ideal and equality for all, irrespective of a person's background.

LFC considers racism in any form to be unacceptable - without compromise. It is our strong held belief, having gone over the facts of the case, that Luis Suarez did not commit any racist act. It is also our opinion that the accusation by this particular player was not credible - certainly no more credible than his prior unfounded accusations.

It is key to note that Patrice Evra himself in his written statement in this case said 'I don't think that Luis Suarez is racist'. The FA in their opening remarks accepted that Luis Suarez was not racist.

Luis himself is of a mixed race family background as his grandfather was black. He has been personally involved since the 2010 World Cup in a charitable project which uses sport to encourage solidarity amongst people of different backgrounds with the central theme that the colour of a person's skin does not matter; they can all play together as a team.

He has played with black players and mixed with their families whilst with the Uruguay national side and was Captain at Ajax Amsterdam of a team with a proud multi-cultural profile, many of whom became good friends.

It seems incredible to us that a player of mixed heritage should be accused and found guilty in the way he has based on the evidence presented. We do not recognise the way in which Luis Suarez has been characterised.

It appears to us that the FA were determined to bring charges against Luis Suarez, even before interviewing him at the beginning of November. Nothing we have heard in the course of the hearing has changed our view that Luis Suarez is innocent of the charges brought against him and we will provide Luis with whatever support he now needs to clear his name.

We would also like to know when the FA intend to charge Patrice Evra with making abusive remarks to an opponent after he admitted himself in his evidence to insulting Luis Suarez in Spanish in the most objectionable of terms. Luis, to his credit, actually told the FA he had not heard the insult.

Chris wrote:

Liverpool FC Statement:

Liverpool Football Club is very surprised and disappointed with the decision of the Football Association Commission to find Luis Suarez guilty of the charges against him.

We look forward to the publication of the Commission's Judgment. We will study the detailed reasons of the Commission once they become available, but reserve our right to appeal or take any other course of action we feel appropriate with regards to this situation.

We find it extraordinary that Luis can be found guilty on the word of Patrice Evra alone when no-one else on the field of play - including Evra's own Manchester United teammates and all the match officials - heard the alleged conversation between the two players in a crowded Kop goalmouth while a corner kick was about to be taken.

The Club takes extremely seriously the fight against all forms of discrimination and has a long and successful track record in work relating to anti-racist activity and social inclusion. We remain committed to this ideal and equality for all, irrespective of a person's background.

LFC considers racism in any form to be unacceptable - without compromise. It is our strong held belief, having gone over the facts of the case, that Luis Suarez did not commit any racist act. It is also our opinion that the accusation by this particular player was not credible - certainly no more credible than his prior unfounded accusations.

It is key to note that Patrice Evra himself in his written statement in this case said 'I don't think that Luis Suarez is racist'. The FA in their opening remarks accepted that Luis Suarez was not racist.

Luis himself is of a mixed race family background as his grandfather was black. He has been personally involved since the 2010 World Cup in a charitable project which uses sport to encourage solidarity amongst people of different backgrounds with the central theme that the colour of a person's skin does not matter; they can all play together as a team.

He has played with black players and mixed with their families whilst with the Uruguay national side and was Captain at Ajax Amsterdam of a team with a proud multi-cultural profile, many of whom became good friends.

It seems incredible to us that a player of mixed heritage should be accused and found guilty in the way he has based on the evidence presented. We do not recognise the way in which Luis Suarez has been characterised.

It appears to us that the FA were determined to bring charges against Luis Suarez, even before interviewing him at the beginning of November. Nothing we have heard in the course of the hearing has changed our view that Luis Suarez is innocent of the charges brought against him and we will provide Luis with whatever support he now needs to clear his name.

We would also like to know when the FA intend to charge Patrice Evra with making abusive remarks to an opponent after he admitted himself in his evidence to insulting Luis Suarez in Spanish in the most objectionable of terms. Luis, to his credit, actually told the FA he had not heard the insult.

Sean wrote:

Dean wrote:What a great statement from the club. Made up over it. It's quite clear the FA were gunna' charge Suarez, regardless. It's to make an example. And as Liverpool said, were the fuck is the evidence? Evra's word? The whole thing stinks, the lot of it.

Right, so the FA just decided to charge him with no evidence to make a point. Dont be thick Dean, you get so biased some times.

Eternal Witcher wrote:

moscowmadeit3 wrote:

So true. They've ran their mouths of to the media about it and their staff have on twitter. Does it really surprise you though, RR?

At least we respected the FA and remained silent on the matter and let them deal with it. Liverpool have ran stories about Evra having a track record of this, which is truly disgusting. Was there an apology? No.

You are quite pathetic, getting emotional over something that is not really your concern.

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

moscowmadeit3 wrote:

So true. They've ran their mouths of to the media about it and their staff have on twitter. Does it really surprise you though, RR?

At least we respected the FA and remained silent on the matter and let them deal with it. Liverpool have ran stories about Evra having a track record of this, which is truly disgusting. Was there an apology? No.

No it doesn't, if you're a good player and you play for Liverpool you're like a God as far as their concerned, and anyone who doesn't agree with you is worse than Hitler.

Big_Lad_Taylor wrote:

ricky//habana wrote:

Google it. this stupid argument has been made countless times.

I dont think it is stupid. The rules of the past no longer apply.. no one should abuse anyone mind.

moscowmadeit3 wrote:

ResurrectionRooney wrote:The way that Dalglish and Liverpool have conducted themselves has been absolutely shameful.

So true. They've ran their mouths of to the media about it and their staff have on twitter. Does it really surprise you though, RR?

At least we respected the FA and remained silent on the matter and let them deal with it. Liverpool have ran stories about Evra having a track record of this, which is truly disgusting. Was there an apology? No.

moscowmadeit3 wrote:

Eternal Witcher wrote:

You are quite pathetic, getting emotional over something that is not really your concern.

Emotional? Just saying ever since the start of this whole racism event Liverpool have tried pinning all the blame on Evra.

Dan wrote:

moscowmadeit3 wrote:

So true. They've ran their mouths of to the media about it and their staff have on twitter. Does it really surprise you though, RR?

At least we respected the FA and remained silent on the matter and let them deal with it. Liverpool have ran stories about Evra having a track record of this, which is truly disgusting. Was there an apology? No.

We defended our player. Shame on fucking us.

ricky//habana wrote:

Big_Lad_Taylor wrote:
I dont think it is stupid. The rules of the past no longer apply.. no one should abuse anyone mind.

The "rules of the past"? Racism is a big and current issue, It doesn't just stop after a set time. It stops when people become tolerant and educated.