Luis Suarez made RACIST comments towards Patrice Evra

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

Dean wrote:
3.) Evra HAS accused before and pulled the racism card. Remember the cool down bust up at Stanford Bridge involving Evra and the Chelsea staff? Didn't he accuse one of the members of staff of using racist language towards him? And guess what... it wasn't proved and as a result, Evra was fined and was banned for 4 games. So should the same happened if it can't be proved? Consistency...

This DID NOT happen, Evra didn't hear the alleged racist comment from the Groundsman, it was Michael Phelan who heard it and reported it. It is a disgrace how you Liverpool fans propagate this myth, although I'm not sure if it's because you're deliberately lying or because of how gullible and stupid you are.

Sean wrote:I will say though, Im pretty sure I saw Liverpool fans calling Terry a racist yesterday when he hasnt been found guilty either. Double standards.

Dean wrote:Exactly Sean, I wasn't quite with what happened with Evra/Chelsea staff, I had a basic rough idea of what happened, hence my question marks.

Anyway, question for RR- What happens if Suárez is proven innocent? What happens to Evra?

Scott wrote:

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

This DID NOT happen, Evra didn't hear the alleged racist comment from the Groundsman, it was Michael Phelan who heard it and reported it. It is a disgrace how you Liverpool fans propagate this myth, although I'm not sure if it's because you're deliberately lying or because of how gullible and stupid you are.

Why did Evra get fined and banned then if he wasn't involved?

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

Scott wrote:

Why did Evra get fined and banned then if he wasn't involved?

He was involved in a fight.

Scott wrote:

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

He was involved in a fight.

Got a link to back this claim up?

54. There is an important point to stress: The allegation of the racist remark is completely irrelevant to the charges against Mr Evra. He has never claimed to have heard any such remark. It follows that he claims no provocation by any racist remark or any justification for his actions as a result of any such remark.

He said that some of the ground staff seemed to try deliberately to get in the Manchester United players’ way and that this particular groundsman had suddenly accelerated towards Mr Evra, i.e. with his lawnmower.

20. Mr Strudwick’s account is that Mr Griffin “was carrying a pitchfork and his body language supported an angry demeanour. He was instantly aggressive and the tone of his voice was hostile and confrontational.”

At the same time, another Chelsea groundsman continued to drive machinery into the path of the players, which Mr Strudwick thought was extremely dangerous.

Mr Evra then ran over and pushed his chest into Mr Griffin to separate Mr Griffin and Mr Strudwick. Mr Evra told Mr Griffin to put his fork down and Mr Griffin replied, “I’ll shove the ******* fork up your arse.”

We find
Mr Evra’s account exaggerated and unreliable. It is an attempt to justify a physical intervention by him which cannot reasonably be justified.

ResurrectionRooney wrote:Have you never had a fight in your life?

Alan wrote:

ResurrectionRooney wrote:Have you never had a fight in your life?

Now you change your fucking tune, what would you do if you were getting spat on bottles of pish thrown at you and parts of concrete from a crumbling stadium throw at you and the players of you football team. Would you just stand and take it?

But its ok for Evra to get involved in a fight but if it was a Liverpool player or fan you would post something against them.

Alan wrote:

Now you change your fucking tune, what would you do if you were getting spat on bottles of pish thrown at you and parts of concrete from a crumbling stadium throw at you and the players of you football team. Would you just stand and take it?

ResurrectionRooney wrote:What the fuck have you done to the quoting system you mong?

Liverpool fans causing carnage against Roma and getting a kicking is neither here nor there, it doesn't justify what you guys did to Juventus fans in any way, shape or form, nor does is justify the outrageously irresponsible and criminal behaviour of Liverpool fans who seemed to be trying to bring Hillsborough to Athens. Even if 100 Liverpool fans had been killed in Rome in 84, it does not justify your behaviour at Heysel

Alan wrote:

ResurrectionRooney wrote:What the fuck have you done to the quoting system you mong?

Liverpool fans causing carnage against Roma and getting a kicking is neither here nor there, it doesn't justify what you guys did to Juventus fans in any way, shape or form, nor does is justify the outrageously irresponsible and criminal behaviour of Liverpool fans who seemed to be trying to bring Hillsborough to Athens. Even if 100 Liverpool fans had been killed in Rome in 84, it does not justify your behaviour at Heysel

Maybe it does not justify what happened but there were more than Liverpool fans there and the italian fans were not exactly what i would call friendly throwing things like concrete from the crumbling stadium at the Liverpool players and their fans before anything happened at Hysel. But if someone tried to badly hurt me in life i would defend myself , and you can stick your fucking law up your arse if someone was attacking me and trying to kill me i would do anything to stop them if i could.

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

Alan wrote:

Maybe it does not justify what happened but there were more than Liverpool fans there and the italian fans were not exactly what i would call friendly throwing things like concrete from the crumbling stadium at the Liverpool players and their fans before anything happened at Hysel. But if someone tried to badly hurt me in life i would defend myself , and you can stick your fucking law up your arse if someone was attacking me and trying to kill me i would do anything to stop them if i could.

The law gives you the right to defend yourself by any means necessary if you're genuinely in fear for your life, and what do you mean 'maybe it doesn't justify what happened'? It absolutely doesn't. It'd be like if Liverpool fans were murdered by Juve fans because they'd had a dispute with Millwall in the past.

You are the only person I know who consistently supports and tries to justify Liverpool fans bloodthirsty hooliganism.

ResurrectionRooney wrote:I wonder if people have realised yet that you pull that icon out when you can't formulate a response.

ResurrectionRooney wrote:I wonder if people have realised yet that you pull that icon out when you can't formulate a response.

ahlycotc wrote:

Mc Babel wrote:

ahlycotc wrote: