Mal wrote:James:
Level 2 / Baiting / 14th May 2011 / Royal
Level 1 / Off topic threads / 14th May 2011 / Royal
Level 1 / Personal insult / 15th May 2011 / Ché Guayaba
Level 1 / Spam thread / 28th May 2011 / Zzonked
________________________________________________________
5 day ban served, infractions cleared (Don't delete)
________________________________________________________
Level 1 / Personal insult / 5th June 2011 / Marvin EXPIRED
Level 1 / Personal insult / 9th July 2011 / ayvee1 EXPIRED
Level 1 / Baiting thread / 12th July 2011 / Zzonked EXPIRED
Level 1 / Troll thread / 12th July 2011 / Zzonked EXPIRED
Level 1 / Troll thread / 12th July 2011 / Zzonked EXPIRED
Level 3 / Personal Insults / 27th July 2011 / Marvin EXPIRED
Again, a huge Arsenal bias.
See 4 of them are for baiting/trolling. Something you openely said you don't mind. That is 5 infraction points knocked off which leaves me on 8. Then there are 2 more infraction points for an off topic and spam thread, things which happen alot by different people. I don't see why a spam thread is different so spam posts. So that's down to 6 infractions which I believe are for calling Al a paedo. Now you may not agree, but you cannot deny my opinion on people who sleep with underage girls. Really, I shouldn't have any infractions.
But also your stupidity comes into play here, the fact Arsenal fans get away with shit like this all the time (especially the excessive trolling of Liverpool fans) this is why there is clear Arsenal bias. Along with one of the top dogs being an Arsenal fan i'm sure the mods don't wanna lose their modship for punishing your friends.
Mal wrote:http://www.the-playmaker.com/t9172-football-fans
http://www.the-playmaker.com/t9171-3-years-ago-today
http://www.the-playmaker.com/t9157-best-welsh-player-at-the-moment
http://www.the-playmaker.com/t8930-woo-woo-woo
http://www.the-playmaker.com/t8666-boohoo
http://www.the-playmaker.com/t8602-man-u-fans
http://www.the-playmaker.com/t8494-arsenal-sign
http://www.the-playmaker.com/t8341-how-many-times-will-barcelona-players-surround-the-ref
http://www.the-playmaker.com/t8248-super-matty-fryatt-da-da-da
http://www.the-playmaker.com/t8175-what-nationality-is-luke
http://www.the-playmaker.com/t7528-pip
http://www.the-playmaker.com/t7363-which-of-these-clubs-is-the-biggest-of-the-smaller-clubs
http://www.the-playmaker.com/t7355-when-will-arsenal-sign-a-keeper-as-good-as-their-rivals
http://www.the-playmaker.com/t6003-seriously-though
http://www.the-playmaker.com/t5845-dear-crump
Five star threads from James.
1) I can't view
2) People where making 'x amount of years ago threads and they stayed open. Nothing wrong with it.
3) Was a fun poll about Welsh players, comparison threads happen alot.
4) Fair enough.
5) Fair enough I guess.
6) A thread with my opinion with hope that other people would voice their own.
7) Fair enough.
Legitmate thread about an obvious problem in football.
9) Everyone else praises players, why can't I?
10) Fair enough, should have been moved to general discussion.
11) Fair enough.
12) Don't see the problem with this thread, Wenger said it.
13) Same as 12.
14) I have no idea.
15) Can't see it.
Okay, so let's say I made 7 spam threads (5 + 2 I couldn't see). People make more than that, and as I said, why's a spam thread worse than spam posts?
7 spam threads + 0 deserved infractions... I don't see the point.
